Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Pac 12 Conference Financial Problems Are Not

2»

Comments

  • Meek
    Meek Member Posts: 7,031
    Meek said:
    this one is particularly funny to me...you have a shitty product that is literally not sellable and then you fire all the sales staff. never has a thing to do with the guy who created the product.
  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,661
    Meek said:

    Meek said:
    this one is particularly funny to me...you have a shitty product that is literally not sellable and then you fire all the sales staff. never has a thing to do with the guy who created the product.
    It's usually the death knell when a company starts downsizing the sales force
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,913
    The PAC 12 ADs need to demand that the network be packaged and peddled to FSN or NBCSN.
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,913
    dnc said:

    salemcoog said:

    Without USC and UCLA, the PAC 12 is the Mtn West.

    Take the top 2 programs out of any conference and they look pretty damn mediocre.

    Kansas
    Kansas State
    Texas Tech
    Baylor
    TCU
    West Virginia
    Oklahoma State

    NC State
    Wake
    BC
    Louisville
    Syracuse
    Va Tech
    GT
    Pitt
    UVA
    Duke
    UNC
    Miami

    Indiana
    Maryland
    Michigan State
    Rutgers
    Iowa
    Nebraska
    Minnesota
    Northwestern
    Illinois
    Purdue
    Pedo

    Missouri
    Ole Miss
    Mississippi State
    Arkansas
    Vandy
    Auburn
    UT
    Georgia
    Florida
    Kentucky
    SC Cocks
    TAMU

    Yeah, we can quibble about which ACC Florida school to remove and who leaves the SEC with Bama, but every one of those conferences takes a hit without two top schools and only the SEC looks formidable without it's top programs.

    The Pacs real problem isn't how bad it looks without the LA schools, it's how bad it looks without USC. We can argue whether UCLA is the second most important Pac program but it's at least in the discussion, and is far less significant than the number two in any of these other conferences.
    Ummm. UCLA is the 2nd most important program in the PAC 12, and the only other that’s close is Oregon.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,705 Founders Club
    salemcoog said:

    dnc said:

    salemcoog said:

    Without USC and UCLA, the PAC 12 is the Mtn West.

    Take the top 2 programs out of any conference and they look pretty damn mediocre.

    Kansas
    Kansas State
    Texas Tech
    Baylor
    TCU
    West Virginia
    Oklahoma State

    NC State
    Wake
    BC
    Louisville
    Syracuse
    Va Tech
    GT
    Pitt
    UVA
    Duke
    UNC
    Miami

    Indiana
    Maryland
    Michigan State
    Rutgers
    Iowa
    Nebraska
    Minnesota
    Northwestern
    Illinois
    Purdue
    Pedo

    Missouri
    Ole Miss
    Mississippi State
    Arkansas
    Vandy
    Auburn
    UT
    Georgia
    Florida
    Kentucky
    SC Cocks
    TAMU

    Yeah, we can quibble about which ACC Florida school to remove and who leaves the SEC with Bama, but every one of those conferences takes a hit without two top schools and only the SEC looks formidable without it's top programs.

    The Pacs real problem isn't how bad it looks without the LA schools, it's how bad it looks without USC. We can argue whether UCLA is the second most important Pac program but it's at least in the discussion, and is far less significant than the number two in any of these other conferences.
    Ummm. UCLA is the 2nd most important program in the PAC 12, and the only other that’s close is Oregon.
    coogs gonna coog

    Football is the most important sport and UCLA sucks at it. We are back and Oregon can't even beat WSU anymore
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,913
    edited June 2018

    salemcoog said:

    dnc said:

    salemcoog said:

    Without USC and UCLA, the PAC 12 is the Mtn West.

    Take the top 2 programs out of any conference and they look pretty damn mediocre.

    Kansas
    Kansas State
    Texas Tech
    Baylor
    TCU
    West Virginia
    Oklahoma State

    NC State
    Wake
    BC
    Louisville
    Syracuse
    Va Tech
    GT
    Pitt
    UVA
    Duke
    UNC
    Miami

    Indiana
    Maryland
    Michigan State
    Rutgers
    Iowa
    Nebraska
    Minnesota
    Northwestern
    Illinois
    Purdue
    Pedo

    Missouri
    Ole Miss
    Mississippi State
    Arkansas
    Vandy
    Auburn
    UT
    Georgia
    Florida
    Kentucky
    SC Cocks
    TAMU

    Yeah, we can quibble about which ACC Florida school to remove and who leaves the SEC with Bama, but every one of those conferences takes a hit without two top schools and only the SEC looks formidable without it's top programs.

    The Pacs real problem isn't how bad it looks without the LA schools, it's how bad it looks without USC. We can argue whether UCLA is the second most important Pac program but it's at least in the discussion, and is far less significant than the number two in any of these other conferences.
    Ummm. UCLA is the 2nd most important program in the PAC 12, and the only other that’s close is Oregon.
    coogs gonna coog

    Football is the most important sport and UCLA sucks at it. We are back and Oregon can't even beat WSU anymore
    Despite your runner up finishes in Rowboat and Softball, you aren’t really that important nor influential to the PAC 12 athletically. No one gives a fuck about who finished 2nd in the PAC 12 north or a Rose Bowl won 20 years ago against a 4 loss team.
  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 23,662 Founders Club
    edited June 2018
    UW has the coach and has been in big games.

    It's UW and SC.

    Oregon is dead to everyone outside of the nw

    Always a good time when some coog thinks UW doesn't matter to the package 12, being in the heart of Seattle. It's not like espn ignored Petersen's gripes last.

    UCLA could matter more but they're too much of a joke.
  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,661
    haie said:

    UW has the coach and has been in big games.

    It's UW and SC.

    Oregon is dead to everyone outside of the nw

    Always a good time when some coog thinks UW doesn't matter to the package 12, being in the heart of Seattle. It's not like espn ignored Petersen's gripes last.

    UCLA could matter more but they're too much of a joke.

    Disagree
  • Mosster47
    Mosster47 Member Posts: 6,246
    salemcoog said:

    salemcoog said:

    dnc said:

    salemcoog said:

    Without USC and UCLA, the PAC 12 is the Mtn West.

    Take the top 2 programs out of any conference and they look pretty damn mediocre.

    Kansas
    Kansas State
    Texas Tech
    Baylor
    TCU
    West Virginia
    Oklahoma State

    NC State
    Wake
    BC
    Louisville
    Syracuse
    Va Tech
    GT
    Pitt
    UVA
    Duke
    UNC
    Miami

    Indiana
    Maryland
    Michigan State
    Rutgers
    Iowa
    Nebraska
    Minnesota
    Northwestern
    Illinois
    Purdue
    Pedo

    Missouri
    Ole Miss
    Mississippi State
    Arkansas
    Vandy
    Auburn
    UT
    Georgia
    Florida
    Kentucky
    SC Cocks
    TAMU

    Yeah, we can quibble about which ACC Florida school to remove and who leaves the SEC with Bama, but every one of those conferences takes a hit without two top schools and only the SEC looks formidable without it's top programs.

    The Pacs real problem isn't how bad it looks without the LA schools, it's how bad it looks without USC. We can argue whether UCLA is the second most important Pac program but it's at least in the discussion, and is far less significant than the number two in any of these other conferences.
    Ummm. UCLA is the 2nd most important program in the PAC 12, and the only other that’s close is Oregon.
    coogs gonna coog

    Football is the most important sport and UCLA sucks at it. We are back and Oregon can't even beat WSU anymore
    Despite your runner up finishes in Rowboat and Softball, you aren’t really that important nor influential to the PAC 12 athletically. No one gives a fuck about who finished 2nd in the PAC 12 north or a Rose Bowl won 20 years ago against a 4 loss team.
    But the Crusades/Drew Brees!
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,913
    haie said:

    UW has the coach and has been in big games.

    It's UW and SC.

    Oregon is dead to everyone outside of the nw

    Always a good time when some coog thinks UW doesn't matter to the package 12, being in the heart of Seattle. It's not like espn ignored Petersen's gripes last.

    UCLA could matter more but they're too much of a joke.

    So a team that hasn’t won a major bowl in close to 20 years and has never been to a Final Four is important to the PAC 12.

    Look the PAC 12 sucks. But not nearly like that.

    Say what you want about Oregon but they’ve won 4 major bowl games since you have and went to the Final Four in 2017.
  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 23,662 Founders Club
    salemcoog said:

    haie said:

    UW has the coach and has been in big games.

    It's UW and SC.

    Oregon is dead to everyone outside of the nw

    Always a good time when some coog thinks UW doesn't matter to the package 12, being in the heart of Seattle. It's not like espn ignored Petersen's gripes last.

    UCLA could matter more but they're too much of a joke.

    So a team that hasn’t won a major bowl in close to 20 years and has never been to a Final Four is important to the PAC 12.

    Look the PAC 12 sucks. But not nearly like that.

    Say what you want about Oregon but they’ve won 4 major bowl games since you have and went to the Final Four in 2017.
    Going to and winning the playoffs in football is all that matters in college sports.

    If you have to bring any non-football sport into the conversation you've lost. Yay made it into sports betting talk for a weekend after everyone realizes cfb is over for the year and there is nothing else going on!!! May as well talk about Oregons golf Natty or beavlet baseball.

    And yes these realities mean the coogs need to fuck off to the mountain west/big sky forever and you need to be a 12.
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,913
    haie said:

    salemcoog said:

    haie said:

    UW has the coach and has been in big games.

    It's UW and SC.

    Oregon is dead to everyone outside of the nw

    Always a good time when some coog thinks UW doesn't matter to the package 12, being in the heart of Seattle. It's not like espn ignored Petersen's gripes last.

    UCLA could matter more but they're too much of a joke.

    So a team that hasn’t won a major bowl in close to 20 years and has never been to a Final Four is important to the PAC 12.

    Look the PAC 12 sucks. But not nearly like that.

    Say what you want about Oregon but they’ve won 4 major bowl games since you have and went to the Final Four in 2017.
    Going to and winning the playoffs in football is all that matters in college sports.

    If you have to bring any non-football sport into the conversation you've lost. Yay made it into sports betting talk for a weekend after everyone realizes cfb is over for the year and there is nothing else going on!!! May as well talk about Oregons golf Natty or beavlet baseball.

    And yes these realities mean the coogs need to fuck off to the mountain west/big sky forever and you need to be a 12.
    You truly are one dense Blazer fan. Are you sure you didn’t go to PCC?
  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 23,662 Founders Club
    salemcoog said:

    haie said:

    salemcoog said:

    haie said:

    UW has the coach and has been in big games.

    It's UW and SC.

    Oregon is dead to everyone outside of the nw

    Always a good time when some coog thinks UW doesn't matter to the package 12, being in the heart of Seattle. It's not like espn ignored Petersen's gripes last.

    UCLA could matter more but they're too much of a joke.

    So a team that hasn’t won a major bowl in close to 20 years and has never been to a Final Four is important to the PAC 12.

    Look the PAC 12 sucks. But not nearly like that.

    Say what you want about Oregon but they’ve won 4 major bowl games since you have and went to the Final Four in 2017.
    Going to and winning the playoffs in football is all that matters in college sports.

    If you have to bring any non-football sport into the conversation you've lost. Yay made it into sports betting talk for a weekend after everyone realizes cfb is over for the year and there is nothing else going on!!! May as well talk about Oregons golf Natty or beavlet baseball.

    And yes these realities mean the coogs need to fuck off to the mountain west/big sky forever and you need to be a 12.
    You truly are one dense Blazer fan. Are you sure you didn’t go to PCC?
    UW Class of 2010.

    The irony is that UW is ALL that matters in Pac 12 athletics to a coog. Embrace it little brother!
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,705 Founders Club
    Look out fast the world forgot about Oregon
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,913

    Look out fast the world forgot about Oregon

    Engrish? Old man.
  • Meek
    Meek Member Posts: 7,031
    and the good news for the Pac12 under Larry Scott's stewardship just keeps coming!!!