The Standard For UW Football
Comments
-
Bama had one elite season between the early 80s and Saban's arrival for Christ sake. Until a few years ago UW had a way more recent Natty than Clempson. This shit is cyclical for all programs, except Oregon. That was a once in a century type deal. 55,000 seat stadiums don't win NTs. Case closed.oregonblitzkrieg said:I like how USC is allegedly a top tier program that belongs alongside the likes of Bama but they haven't made the playoffs and haven't done jack shit for a decade and a half now. They are just another PAC 12 team that got lucky with a great coach, like Oregon did. If they're so fucking great and SO FUCKING BETTER than everyone else, why aren't they vying for a spot in the playoffs every year, like Bama and other similar teams? Also, comparing UW to Clemson is ludicrous. Clemson was in the playoffs for 3 straight years, beat Bama for a natty and is light years ahead of UW in coaching, recruiting and in every other department.
-
I love our open borders policy here at Hardcore Husky and welcome all our gas pumping southern brethren.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Some us are banned on doogman. And equook. And on most other boreds. HH is the only place we can cum to make excuses as to why UW can't have a dominant team again.Dennis_DeYoung said:
THE WHOLE POONT OF THIS THREAD IS THAT WE CAN HAVE DOMINANT TEAMS. WE HAVE HAD THEM. WE CAN AGAIN.DawgFader said:Does any of this matter with Browning at the helm?
Feel like elite QB talent is a must, to create a scenario that has the Dawgs competing for a National Championship.
IF YOU MAKE EXCUSES AS TO WHY WE CAN'T: YOU ARE THE FUCKING PROBLEM AND FUCK YOU GO TO DAWGMAN. -
Kim Grinolds separates families!YellowSnow said:
I love our open borders policy here at Hardcore Husky and welcome all our gas pumping southern brethren.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Some us are banned on doogman. And equook. And on most other boreds. HH is the only place we can cum to make excuses as to why UW can't have a dominant team again.Dennis_DeYoung said:
THE WHOLE POONT OF THIS THREAD IS THAT WE CAN HAVE DOMINANT TEAMS. WE HAVE HAD THEM. WE CAN AGAIN.DawgFader said:Does any of this matter with Browning at the helm?
Feel like elite QB talent is a must, to create a scenario that has the Dawgs competing for a National Championship.
IF YOU MAKE EXCUSES AS TO WHY WE CAN'T: YOU ARE THE FUCKING PROBLEM AND FUCK YOU GO TO DAWGMAN. -
That's not all. You knew this was coming; here it is: no one gives a shit about USC's voted titles, or buys the horseshit about their alleged 2003 voted natty, except for USC fans and their UW bitches. You guessed it, the only USC title that matters is the one that they won on the field. The BCS title. It's no coincidence that they happened to have an elite head coach at the helm when they won it. You can argue with me about it all you want, but facts are facts. You can't argue with the evidence. Even the 'great' USC needs an elite head coach to go the distance. There is no substitute.dnc said:
Holy shitoregonblitzkrieg said:I like how USC is allegedly a top tier program that belongs alongside the likes of Bama but they haven't made the playoffs and haven't done jack shit for a decade and a half now. They are just another PAC 12 team that got lucky with a great coach, like Oregon did. If they're so fucking great and SO FUCKING BETTER than everyone else, why aren't they vying for a spot in the playoffs every year, like Bama and other similar teams? Also, comparing UW to Clemson is ludicrous. Clemson was in the playoffs for 3 straight years, beat Bama for a natty and is light years ahead of UW in coaching, recruiting and in every other department.
-
oregonblitzkrieg said:
That's not all. You knew this was coming; here it is: no one gives a shit about USC's voted titles, or buys the horseshit about their alleged 2003 voted natty, except for USC fans and their UW bitches. You guessed it, the only USC title that matters is the one that they won on the field. The BCS title. It's no coincidence that they happened to have an elite head coach at the helm when they won it. You can argue with me about it all you want, but facts are facts. You can't argue with the evidence. Even the 'great' USC needs an elite head coach to go the distance. There is no substitute.dnc said:
Holy shitoregonblitzkrieg said:I like how USC is allegedly a top tier program that belongs alongside the likes of Bama but they haven't made the playoffs and haven't done jack shit for a decade and a half now. They are just another PAC 12 team that got lucky with a great coach, like Oregon did. If they're so fucking great and SO FUCKING BETTER than everyone else, why aren't they vying for a spot in the playoffs every year, like Bama and other similar teams? Also, comparing UW to Clemson is ludicrous. Clemson was in the playoffs for 3 straight years, beat Bama for a natty and is light years ahead of UW in coaching, recruiting and in every other department.
-
lol - you've doubled down on being a fucktard. This season is going to hurt you on the inside.oregonblitzkrieg said:
That's not all. You knew this was coming; here it is: no one gives a shit about USC's voted titles, or buys the horseshit about their alleged 2003 voted natty, except for USC fans and their UW bitches. You guessed it, the only USC title that matters is the one that they won on the field. The BCS title. It's no coincidence that they happened to have an elite head coach at the helm when they won it. You can argue with me about it all you want, but facts are facts. You can't argue with the evidence. Even the 'great' USC needs an elite head coach to go the distance. There is no substitute.dnc said:
Holy shitoregonblitzkrieg said:I like how USC is allegedly a top tier program that belongs alongside the likes of Bama but they haven't made the playoffs and haven't done jack shit for a decade and a half now. They are just another PAC 12 team that got lucky with a great coach, like Oregon did. If they're so fucking great and SO FUCKING BETTER than everyone else, why aren't they vying for a spot in the playoffs every year, like Bama and other similar teams? Also, comparing UW to Clemson is ludicrous. Clemson was in the playoffs for 3 straight years, beat Bama for a natty and is light years ahead of UW in coaching, recruiting and in every other department.
-
They have like 11 national titles in the color tv era. That's pretty elite.oregonblitzkrieg said:
That's not all. You knew this was coming; here it is: no one gives a shit about USC's voted titles, or buys the horseshit about their alleged 2003 voted natty, except for USC fans and their UW bitches. You guessed it, the only USC title that matters is the one that they won on the field. The BCS title. It's no coincidence that they happened to have an elite head coach at the helm when they won it. You can argue with me about it all you want, but facts are facts. You can't argue with the evidence. Even the 'great' USC needs an elite head coach to go the distance. There is no substitute.dnc said:
Holy shitoregonblitzkrieg said:I like how USC is allegedly a top tier program that belongs alongside the likes of Bama but they haven't made the playoffs and haven't done jack shit for a decade and a half now. They are just another PAC 12 team that got lucky with a great coach, like Oregon did. If they're so fucking great and SO FUCKING BETTER than everyone else, why aren't they vying for a spot in the playoffs every year, like Bama and other similar teams? Also, comparing UW to Clemson is ludicrous. Clemson was in the playoffs for 3 straight years, beat Bama for a natty and is light years ahead of UW in coaching, recruiting and in every other department.
-
Stumbled upon this and decided to bump it.
First of all, it's a great video clip DDY posted.
Secondly, the thread features standard faggotry from obk & MossterFS. -
With the benefit of another year to think about thisdnc said:
Here's mine:WeakarmCobra said:
UW is top tier 2 program like LSU, but unlike LSU UW pisses away less talentDennis_DeYoung said:
So, LSU is not in any fucking way, shape, or form a Tier I.dnc said:
LSU has to be pretty damn close to tier 1, I know they're in Mandel's "Kings" tier. 3 NC's, 5 unclaimed NC's, a Heisman winner, 25 bowel wins. If they're not tier 1 they're certainly not looking up at anyone in tier 2.Dennis_DeYoung said:
LSU.Gladstone said:What was the last Tier II program to win a national championship without an elite, generational QB?
I’m so fucking sick of this shit.
LSU was shitty or middling for fucking 40 years before Saban.
They got a Natty with Saban and then a run-off Natty under Miles and haven’t done anything since. Before that they won the fucking SEC like twice in 30 years.
THEY ARE NOT TIER I.
Are they at the top of a second tier team? Sure.
Fucking morons out here are saying fucking Clemson and LSU are a tier I because that’s what’s happened recently. There is such a fucking moronic recency bias in people it’s stupid.
FROM 1960 TO 2000 LSU won the SEC 4 times.
A team wins its conference FOUR TIMES in FORTY YEARS and you idiots say they are tier one?!?
Alabama won the SEC 15 times in the same span. Jesus fucking Christ.
It’s fucking embrarrasing.
You know what they have? What Clemson has? What Auburn and UGA have? Good brands.
Don’t confuse a good brand with being Tier I.
Until Saban showed up LSU had one Natty.
In 1958. All their unclaimed Natties are prior to 1965 (and they have an irrelevant one in 2011).
If we’d have hired Saban for fucking 4 years we would have a better history than fucking LSU.
Fuck LSU. They are 13th in winning % all time among P5 programs and we are 17th.
Jesus fucking Christ.
1A (5)
USC, Texas, Oklahoma, Alabama, Ohio State,
1B (6 - 11 total in Tier 1)
Penn State, Florida State, Florida, Miami, Michigan, Notre Dame
2A (5)
LSU, Clemson, Nebraska, Auburn, Georgia
2B (7)
UW, UCLA, Wisconsin, Tennessee, TAMU, Michigan State, Virginia Tech
From there NOC so I'm just going to list Pac12 and SEC schools
3A
Oregon, Stanford
3B
Arkansas, Ole Miss, South Carolina, TOO HIGH, Arizona State, Arizona, Missouri
4
WSU, @Babushka, Vandy, Mississippi State, Kentucky
Texas too high.
1A (5)
USC, Oklahoma, Alabama, Ohio State
1B (5 - 11 total in Tier 1)
Penn State, Florida State, Florida, Miami, Michigan, Notre Dame, Texas
ND is at the top of 1B and really the only one in 1B with a good claim to 1A. The rest are lucky to be there. -
Please, have another chindnc said:
Kim Grinolds separates families!YellowSnow said:
I love our open borders policy here at Hardcore Husky and welcome all our gas pumping southern brethren.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Some us are banned on doogman. And equook. And on most other boreds. HH is the only place we can cum to make excuses as to why UW can't have a dominant team again.Dennis_DeYoung said:
THE WHOLE POONT OF THIS THREAD IS THAT WE CAN HAVE DOMINANT TEAMS. WE HAVE HAD THEM. WE CAN AGAIN.DawgFader said:Does any of this matter with Browning at the helm?
Feel like elite QB talent is a must, to create a scenario that has the Dawgs competing for a National Championship.
IF YOU MAKE EXCUSES AS TO WHY WE CAN'T: YOU ARE THE FUCKING PROBLEM AND FUCK YOU GO TO DAWGMAN.
