WE NEED TO REALIZE THIS IS AN UPHILL BATTLE!

Dennis_DeYoung said:

creepycoug said:

Dennis_DeYoung said:

creepycoug said:

I can remember on fagman bagging on all the Oregon brand people.

I haven't changed my mind. Branding is meaningless without winning.

LSU is a good example. Their brand today stems from having some of the most talented bad ass fucking teams in the las 20 years.

Brand means shit without winning. Winning comes first, then whatever your schtick is, even Peterson's boring no brand brand, becomes cool.

Oregon didn't win because of brand. Their brand became relevant because they won.

Rinse and repeat. Winning fixes everything.

Stanford is different and unique. A school egg heads turn down Harvard and Yale to attend that also offers elite D1 sports. The are in a class of one. Nobody in the PAC can match that. Nobody in the country can.

So your point is that winning and branding matter? Great. This is revolutionary.

And, that wasn't my point you dumb dense dumb fuck.

Reed the post again.

One comes before the other. Hence, one is more important than the other.

You're fucking stupid.

RaceBannon said:

@Dennis_DeYoung and @creepycoug need to take this to the Yellow bored for an old fashioned death match

elord821 said:

RaceBannon said:

@Dennis_DeYoung and @creepycoug need to take this to the Yellow bored for an old fashioned death match

The Fabiculanan bored?