WE NEED TO REALIZE THIS IS AN UPHILL BATTLE!
Comments
-
You new here?elord821 said:
We won't get there if we go on about dick.dnc said:
Only another page and a half to go guys, don't let bnb down!bananasnblondes said:This thread has made my dick so soft that it has changed states from a solid to a liquid. 3 more pages of this shit and it will be a gas
Once his dick changes to a gas we can call him Air BNB
-
dnc said:
Once his dick changes to a gas we can call him Air BNBbananasnblondes said:This thread has made my dick so soft that it has changed states from a solid to a liquid. 3 more pages of this shit and it will be a gas
-
Knew hear*dnc said:
You new here?elord821 said:
We won't get there if we go on about dick.dnc said:
Only another page and a half to go guys, don't let bnb down!bananasnblondes said:This thread has made my dick so soft that it has changed states from a solid to a liquid. 3 more pages of this shit and it will be a gas
Once his dick changes to a gas we can call him Air BNB -
I can remember on fagman bagging on all the Oregon brand people.
I haven't changed my mind. Branding is meaningless without winning.
LSU is a good example. Their brand today stems from having some of the most talented bad ass fucking teams in the las 20 years.
Brand means shit without winning. Winning comes first, then whatever your schtick is, even Peterson's boring no brand brand, becomes cool.
Oregon didn't win because of brand. Their brand became relevant because they won.
Rinse and repeat. Winning fixes everything.
Stanford is different and unique. A school egg heads turn down Harvard and Yale to attend that also offers elite D1 sports. The are in a class of one. Nobody in the PAC can match that. Nobody in the country can. -
When Creep is right, he's right.creepycoug said:I can remember on fagman bagging on all the Oregon brand people.
I haven't changed my mind. Branding is meaningless without winning.
LSU is a good example. Their brand today stems from having some of the most talented bad ass fucking teams in the las 20 years.
Brand means shit without winning. Winning comes first, then whatever your schtick is, even Peterson's boring no brand brand, becomes cool.
Oregon didn't win because of brand. Their brand became relevant because they won.
Rinse and repeat. Winning fixes everything.
Stanford is different and unique. A school egg heads turn down Harvard and Yale to attend that also offers elite D1 sports. The are in a class of one. Nobody in the PAC can match that. Nobody in the country can. -
Thats my point. I was responding to dnc bringing up OU which is in Norman not OKC.elord821 said:
We won't get there if we go on about dick.dnc said:
Only another page and a half to go guys, don't let bnb down!bananasnblondes said:This thread has made my dick so soft that it has changed states from a solid to a liquid. 3 more pages of this shit and it will be a gas
Once his dick changes to a gas we can call him Air BNB
Boulder is 25 miles outside of Denver. That's like saying Everett should count.FremontTroll said:
If we are counting schools that are in suburbs or close to major cities then we need to count Northwestern, Colorado, Rutgers, Maryland, Stanford, ASU...probably others.dnc said:
If we’re counting tOSU and Tejas then OU probably counts too. OKCsucks but it’s not significantly smaller than Columbus or Austin.FremontTroll said:
Georgia Tech and Vandy. Cal should count as Berkeley is right there. Is SLC urban?BleachedAnusDawg said:The Wisconsin comparison is most relevant right now as far as team culture that Petersen seems to expound, but I think we get a lot more elite athletes than they do.
We? should be pushing the "big city" narrative in recruiting. Coaches should post more likes about random gang violence, less about the fucking mountains and kayaking. Make the fast strategy kids from SoCal feel at home. How many major programs are located in the middle of a burgeoning urban environment? USC/UCLA, tOSU, Texas, Minnesota, and who else?
Never been to Raleigh-Durham other than the airport but there are 2 million people there. Not sure if it feels like a city. -
Norman is way more OKC than Boulder is Denver thoughFremontTroll said:
Thats my point. I was responding to dnc bringing up OU which is in Norman not OKC.elord821 said:
We won't get there if we go on about dick.dnc said:
Only another page and a half to go guys, don't let bnb down!bananasnblondes said:This thread has made my dick so soft that it has changed states from a solid to a liquid. 3 more pages of this shit and it will be a gas
Once his dick changes to a gas we can call him Air BNB
Boulder is 25 miles outside of Denver. That's like saying Everett should count.FremontTroll said:
If we are counting schools that are in suburbs or close to major cities then we need to count Northwestern, Colorado, Rutgers, Maryland, Stanford, ASU...probably others.dnc said:
If we’re counting tOSU and Tejas then OU probably counts too. OKCsucks but it’s not significantly smaller than Columbus or Austin.FremontTroll said:
Georgia Tech and Vandy. Cal should count as Berkeley is right there. Is SLC urban?BleachedAnusDawg said:The Wisconsin comparison is most relevant right now as far as team culture that Petersen seems to expound, but I think we get a lot more elite athletes than they do.
We? should be pushing the "big city" narrative in recruiting. Coaches should post more likes about random gang violence, less about the fucking mountains and kayaking. Make the fast strategy kids from SoCal feel at home. How many major programs are located in the middle of a burgeoning urban environment? USC/UCLA, tOSU, Texas, Minnesota, and who else?
Never been to Raleigh-Durham other than the airport but there are 2 million people there. Not sure if it feels like a city. -
So your point is that winning and branding matter? Great. This is revolutionary.creepycoug said:I can remember on fagman bagging on all the Oregon brand people.
I haven't changed my mind. Branding is meaningless without winning.
LSU is a good example. Their brand today stems from having some of the most talented bad ass fucking teams in the las 20 years.
Brand means shit without winning. Winning comes first, then whatever your schtick is, even Peterson's boring no brand brand, becomes cool.
Oregon didn't win because of brand. Their brand became relevant because they won.
Rinse and repeat. Winning fixes everything.
Stanford is different and unique. A school egg heads turn down Harvard and Yale to attend that also offers elite D1 sports. The are in a class of one. Nobody in the PAC can match that. Nobody in the country can. -
I will take your word for it having proudly never stepped foot in Oklahoma. Google maps says 20 miles from OKC so seems equivalent.dnc said:
Norman is way more OKC than Boulder is Denver thoughFremontTroll said:
Thats my point. I was responding to dnc bringing up OU which is in Norman not OKC.elord821 said:
We won't get there if we go on about dick.dnc said:
Only another page and a half to go guys, don't let bnb down!bananasnblondes said:This thread has made my dick so soft that it has changed states from a solid to a liquid. 3 more pages of this shit and it will be a gas
Once his dick changes to a gas we can call him Air BNB
Boulder is 25 miles outside of Denver. That's like saying Everett should count.FremontTroll said:
If we are counting schools that are in suburbs or close to major cities then we need to count Northwestern, Colorado, Rutgers, Maryland, Stanford, ASU...probably others.dnc said:
If we’re counting tOSU and Tejas then OU probably counts too. OKCsucks but it’s not significantly smaller than Columbus or Austin.FremontTroll said:
Georgia Tech and Vandy. Cal should count as Berkeley is right there. Is SLC urban?BleachedAnusDawg said:The Wisconsin comparison is most relevant right now as far as team culture that Petersen seems to expound, but I think we get a lot more elite athletes than they do.
We? should be pushing the "big city" narrative in recruiting. Coaches should post more likes about random gang violence, less about the fucking mountains and kayaking. Make the fast strategy kids from SoCal feel at home. How many major programs are located in the middle of a burgeoning urban environment? USC/UCLA, tOSU, Texas, Minnesota, and who else?
Never been to Raleigh-Durham other than the airport but there are 2 million people there. Not sure if it feels like a city.
Norman is certainly less metropolitan than the other places I listed- Evanston, Palo Alto, Tempe, New Brunswick. -
he is the creepiest coug in the worldSwaye said:
When Creep is right, he's right.creepycoug said:I can remember on fagman bagging on all the Oregon brand people.
I haven't changed my mind. Branding is meaningless without winning.
LSU is a good example. Their brand today stems from having some of the most talented bad ass fucking teams in the las 20 years.
Brand means shit without winning. Winning comes first, then whatever your schtick is, even Peterson's boring no brand brand, becomes cool.
Oregon didn't win because of brand. Their brand became relevant because they won.
Rinse and repeat. Winning fixes everything.
Stanford is different and unique. A school egg heads turn down Harvard and Yale to attend that also offers elite D1 sports. The are in a class of one. Nobody in the PAC can match that. Nobody in the country can.
