Vegas sure likes our? Dwags
Comments
-
So you mean a true freshman QB who isn't ready for D-1 football resulting in the other team's offense getting way more possessions than normal mixed with the said team with young QB not having offensive success could lead to a lopsided game?haie said:All they keep taking about down here is how awesome the roster is. And Herbie (who got bent over by Mountain West).
Like it’s pro sports or something.
Casual fans, especially casual Oregon/Washington fans don’t get how important coaching is until their all world players are down 38-3 and still aren’t getting their reads down.
That is fascinating. I had no idea that could happen. Next you'll tell me a team like Clemson will lose their QB for a week and lose to Syracuse. Maybe something even more outlandish like FSU starting as a top 5 team, lose their QB in the first week and struggle to finish .500. Just a ridiculous premise that never happens, ever. -
Same as Oregon. USC's run was better. By a lotMosster47 said:
Pete had a tremendous seven year run. Outside of that USC has been pedestrian. They only had 1.5, btw.RaceBannon said:
Oregon was the most consistent program in the conference for 25 years, had one bad year, one rebuild year, and appear ready to get back into double digit win territory on a regular basis again. That's not grandeur, that's what serious football programs do.
No natty. USC had 3
Bellotti was pedestrian -
Bama worked the Clemson defense and scored two TDs on UWSledog said:
BullshitMosster47 said:
Good teams have physically dominated UW during the Peterman era. Try again with that. Bama looked like they were playing a junior high.whatshouldicareabout said:
We have a coaching staff that develops players and the best S&C program in the country. You have a Sark.Mosster47 said:
Replace the top 5 QB with a guy that has played a ton and you have UW. Whatever UW fans think they are capable of Duck fans should be as well. A healthy Herbie gets Oregon 9 or 10 wins last year and they are sitting around #13 in the preseason for 2018.DerekJohnson said:
I like some of Mossters points, though he’s spazzing out with delusions of Duck grandeurhaie said:Mosster’s a huge fucking Jack faggot.
HTH
Do you ever have a take that doesn't suck? -
Four 10 win seasons and one and a third conference titles, but still.Mosster47 said:
Mikey B did have like five 10 win seasons with two conference titles, but still.dnc said:
Chip had a tremendous six year run counting the two bonus years under Helfrich. Outside of that Oregon has been pedestrian. They only had 0, btw.Mosster47 said:
Pete had a tremendous seven year run. Outside of that USC has been pedestrian. They only had 1.5, btw.RaceBannon said:
Oregon was the most consistent program in the conference for 25 years, had one bad year, one rebuild year, and appear ready to get back into double digit win territory on a regular basis again. That's not grandeur, that's what serious football programs do.
No natty. USC had 3
Oregon since 1993 (your stated 25 years):
220-93
6 1/3 conference championships
8 top 10 finishes
5 top 5 finishes
2 Rose Bowl wins
2 Fiesta Bowl wins
No national championships
USC since 1993:
219-84-2
6 1/2 conference titles
9 top 10 finishes
8 top 5 finishes
2 Orange Bowl wins
6 Rose Bowl wins
1 1/2 national championships,
Good job, good effort.
-
Oh since you like 10 win seasons.
USC in the last 25 years: 11 ten win seasons (4 outside the Carroll run)
Oregon in the last 25 years: 10 ten win seasons (4 outside the Kelly/Helfrich run)
SC wins by literally every possible metric, winning percentage, top 10 finishes, top 5 finishes, significant bowl wins, national championships, etc. -
USC being a Mt Rushmore school can win a natty with a good (but not all time greats) coach- i.e., Pete Carroll. Oregon and UW are schools that need all the stars to align + HOF type of corch. Fortunately, USC has only made 1 good hire in the past 40 years and that was just dumb luck.dnc said:Oh since you like 10 win seasons.
USC in the last 25 years: 11 ten win seasons (4 outside the Carroll run)
Oregon in the last 25 years: 10 ten win seasons (4 outside the Kelly/Helfrich run)
SC wins by literally every possible metric, winning percentage, top 10 finishes, top 5 finishes, significant bowl wins, national championships, etc. -
Pete Carroll was a great CFB coachYellowSnow said:
USC being a Mt Rushmore school can win a natty with a good (but not all time greats) coach- i.e., Pete Carroll. Oregon and UW are schools that need all the stars to align + HOF type of corch. Fortunately, USC has only made 1 good hire in the past 40 years and that was just dumb luck.dnc said:Oh since you like 10 win seasons.
USC in the last 25 years: 11 ten win seasons (4 outside the Carroll run)
Oregon in the last 25 years: 10 ten win seasons (4 outside the Kelly/Helfrich run)
SC wins by literally every possible metric, winning percentage, top 10 finishes, top 5 finishes, significant bowl wins, national championships, etc. -
Mosster.
Struggling. -
-
He lost to Mack Brown in Los Angeles.dnc said:
Pete Carroll was a great CFB coachYellowSnow said:
USC being a Mt Rushmore school can win a natty with a good (but not all time greats) coach- i.e., Pete Carroll. Oregon and UW are schools that need all the stars to align + HOF type of corch. Fortunately, USC has only made 1 good hire in the past 40 years and that was just dumb luck.dnc said:Oh since you like 10 win seasons.
USC in the last 25 years: 11 ten win seasons (4 outside the Carroll run)
Oregon in the last 25 years: 10 ten win seasons (4 outside the Kelly/Helfrich run)
SC wins by literally every possible metric, winning percentage, top 10 finishes, top 5 finishes, significant bowl wins, national championships, etc.
