Seattle bike lanes getting national coverage...
Comments
-
edit: Looks like we have identified one of the almost dozen bikers who displace thousands of cars creating miles of unnecessary traffic every day in Seattle.UWhuskytskeet said:In other words, someone at Fox found the most expensive project in the city - something that ran for FOUR BLOCKS - then calculated that if every project cost this much per city block then the total cost per mile would be that insane number. It's bullshit because there isn't a single mile of bike lane anywhere in Seattle that cost even close to $12 million to build. Nevermind the fact that it's the entire street being rebuilt, not just a bike path.
I'm sure Fox accidentally left out those details.
-
$374k for streetlights?UWhuskytskeet said:In other words, someone at Fox found the most expensive project in the city - something that ran for FOUR BLOCKS - then calculated that if every project cost this much per city block then the total cost per mile would be that insane number. It's bullshit because there isn't a single mile of bike lane anywhere in Seattle that cost even close to $12 million to build. Nevermind the fact that it's the entire street being rebuilt, not just a bike path.
I'm sure Fox accidentally left out those details.
-
So maybe it isn't about bike lanes after all?greenblood said:
$374k for streetlights?UWhuskytskeet said:In other words, someone at Fox found the most expensive project in the city - something that ran for FOUR BLOCKS - then calculated that if every project cost this much per city block then the total cost per mile would be that insane number. It's bullshit because there isn't a single mile of bike lane anywhere in Seattle that cost even close to $12 million to build. Nevermind the fact that it's the entire street being rebuilt, not just a bike path.
I'm sure Fox accidentally left out those details.
-
1.1 million in overhead?
-
46 lights over 4.5 blocks = 10 a block. $8,000 a light = $368,000greenblood said:
$374k for streetlights?UWhuskytskeet said:In other words, someone at Fox found the most expensive project in the city - something that ran for FOUR BLOCKS - then calculated that if every project cost this much per city block then the total cost per mile would be that insane number. It's bullshit because there isn't a single mile of bike lane anywhere in Seattle that cost even close to $12 million to build. Nevermind the fact that it's the entire street being rebuilt, not just a bike path.
I'm sure Fox accidentally left out those details.
-
It said "new" street lights. Couldn't they just move the old ones?UWhuskytskeet said:
46 lights over 4.5 blocks = 10 a block. $8,000 a light = $368,000greenblood said:
$374k for streetlights?UWhuskytskeet said:In other words, someone at Fox found the most expensive project in the city - something that ran for FOUR BLOCKS - then calculated that if every project cost this much per city block then the total cost per mile would be that insane number. It's bullshit because there isn't a single mile of bike lane anywhere in Seattle that cost even close to $12 million to build. Nevermind the fact that it's the entire street being rebuilt, not just a bike path.
I'm sure Fox accidentally left out those details.
Street lights usually don't deteriorate. It's fabricated metal with wires running inside connected to a bulb. -
I'm sure these new ones are solar powered to reduce carbon footprint or some shit.greenblood said:
It said "new" street lights. Couldn't they just move the old ones?UWhuskytskeet said:
46 lights over 4.5 blocks = 10 a block. $8,000 a light = $368,000greenblood said:
$374k for streetlights?UWhuskytskeet said:In other words, someone at Fox found the most expensive project in the city - something that ran for FOUR BLOCKS - then calculated that if every project cost this much per city block then the total cost per mile would be that insane number. It's bullshit because there isn't a single mile of bike lane anywhere in Seattle that cost even close to $12 million to build. Nevermind the fact that it's the entire street being rebuilt, not just a bike path.
I'm sure Fox accidentally left out those details.
Street lights usually don't deteriorate. It's fabricated metal with wires running inside connected to a bulb. -
And high-intensity LEDs to bake your retinas.Swaye said:
I'm sure these new ones are solar powered to reduce carbon footprint or some shit.greenblood said:
It said "new" street lights. Couldn't they just move the old ones?UWhuskytskeet said:
46 lights over 4.5 blocks = 10 a block. $8,000 a light = $368,000greenblood said:
$374k for streetlights?UWhuskytskeet said:In other words, someone at Fox found the most expensive project in the city - something that ran for FOUR BLOCKS - then calculated that if every project cost this much per city block then the total cost per mile would be that insane number. It's bullshit because there isn't a single mile of bike lane anywhere in Seattle that cost even close to $12 million to build. Nevermind the fact that it's the entire street being rebuilt, not just a bike path.
I'm sure Fox accidentally left out those details.
Street lights usually don't deteriorate. It's fabricated metal with wires running inside connected to a bulb. -
I couldn't tell you. Maybe. Who gives a shit.greenblood said:
It said "new" street lights. Couldn't they just move the old ones?UWhuskytskeet said:
46 lights over 4.5 blocks = 10 a block. $8,000 a light = $368,000greenblood said:
$374k for streetlights?UWhuskytskeet said:In other words, someone at Fox found the most expensive project in the city - something that ran for FOUR BLOCKS - then calculated that if every project cost this much per city block then the total cost per mile would be that insane number. It's bullshit because there isn't a single mile of bike lane anywhere in Seattle that cost even close to $12 million to build. Nevermind the fact that it's the entire street being rebuilt, not just a bike path.
I'm sure Fox accidentally left out those details.
Street lights usually don't deteriorate. It's fabricated metal with wires running inside connected to a bulb.
The point is the Fox News article is bullshit because there isn't a $12M bike lane. It's a bike lane added on to four blocks of new streets, sidewalks, street lamps, sewers, etc. -
Couldn't they just offer jobs for some of the homeless, by having them stand on step ladders holding flashlights? Small footprint and you help with the homeless crises.Swaye said:
I'm sure these new ones are solar powered to reduce carbon footprint or some shit.greenblood said:
It said "new" street lights. Couldn't they just move the old ones?UWhuskytskeet said:
46 lights over 4.5 blocks = 10 a block. $8,000 a light = $368,000greenblood said:
$374k for streetlights?UWhuskytskeet said:In other words, someone at Fox found the most expensive project in the city - something that ran for FOUR BLOCKS - then calculated that if every project cost this much per city block then the total cost per mile would be that insane number. It's bullshit because there isn't a single mile of bike lane anywhere in Seattle that cost even close to $12 million to build. Nevermind the fact that it's the entire street being rebuilt, not just a bike path.
I'm sure Fox accidentally left out those details.
Street lights usually don't deteriorate. It's fabricated metal with wires running inside connected to a bulb.
Get somebody like me in charge. I'll solve your problems




