2018 Pac-12 Football Coach Rankings: Can Anyone Win a National Title?
Comments
-
Oh dude my bad, I was under the impression from your original comment that I was retorting that we were discussing the more storied program in terms of football history.oregonblitzkrieg said:
No category for playoff wins in this display. GTF outta here with this doog shit. Win/loss records, NFL drafts picks, weeks at #1 etc., none of that matters. Only playoff wins & national championships (which require playoff wins in the modern era) matter. UO has 1 playoff win. UW has zero playoff wins. UO played in 2 natty games. UW has never played in one. UW has half a voted natty. UO matched that accomplishment in 2010 with an undefeated season. In short, UO will be the dominant program until UW gets a playoff win. Then both programs will be on equal footing again.DoogCourics said:oregonblitzkrieg said:
I'm not even charged to half quook. Bow down and recognize the accomplishments of the O, bitches. Acknowledge that we? are your betters in football accomplishments and I'll go easier on the beatdowns next time. The case has been laid out and the facts presented. The 2 undefeated seasons cancel each other out. The program with the most playoff wins is the more storied program. #QuookLogic is #WinningLogicPurpleJ said:Angry quook obk is best obk. Glad to see my comment spark some decent discussion around here lol

Quite literally the only thing Oregon is more storied in is Heisman winners. And yes, Marcus was amazing.
But even with a 12 year stretch of dominance by Oregon and Washington hitting the ultimate depths of hell, Oregon is still behind in every metric.
I didn't realize you were attempting to make an argument that college football didn't begin until 2014 when the Playoffs began (by your definition 2010 "natty game" doesn't count because it did not require a playoff win to get into, but rather voters chose the teams).
So by this measure the most storied programs are Alabama, Clemson, Ohio State, Georgia, and Oregon (one of these things is not like the others), as they are the only teams to have won playoff games, or National Championships that required playoff wins in the modern era.
I mean, it's ok to be a little retarded. We all are. But.....
PS - USC, Oklahoma, Notre Dame, Michigan, Texas, Nebraska, Tennessee, Penn State, LSU, and a few others would like a word.
PSS - Thank you for the FREE PUB! at the beginning of your statement.
You can continue trolling now.
-
Bunch of retards beating each other up
It's USC and then everyone else.
Oregon vs Washington is a dumb debate.
If you are over 40 I guess you think Washington is better and if you are under then Oregon is way better. -
Washington and OregonPitchfork51 said:Bunch of retards beating each other up
It's USC and then everyone else.
Oregon vs Washington is a dumb debate.
If you are over 40 I guess you think Washington is better and if you are under then Oregon is way better.


Arizona State
-
No arguments here
-
We've been undefeated more than once. And we have more than one REAL national title.oregonblitzkrieg said:
I'm not even charged to half quook. Bow down and recognize the accomplishments of the O, bitches. Acknowledge that we? are your betters in football accomplishments and I'll go easier on the beatdowns next time. The case has been laid out and the facts presented. The 2 undefeated seasons cancel each other out. The program with the most playoff wins is the more storied program. #QuookLogic is #WinningLogicPurpleJ said:Angry quook obk is best obk. Glad to see my comment spark some decent discussion around here lol
Looks like I win again.
-
He is completely serious.Swaye said:
I know you are trolling, because nobody but Hondo can be this stupid.oregonblitzkrieg said:
No category for playoff wins in this display. GTF outta here with this doog shit. Win/loss records, NFL drafts picks, weeks at #1 etc., none of that matters. Only playoff wins & national championships (which require playoff wins in the modern era) matter. UO has 1 playoff win. UW has zero playoff wins. UO played in 2 natty games. UW has never played in one. UW has half a voted natty. UO matched that accomplishment in 2010 with an undefeated season. In short, UO will be the dominant program until UW gets a playoff win. Then both programs will be on equal footing again.DoogCourics said:oregonblitzkrieg said:
I'm not even charged to half quook. Bow down and recognize the accomplishments of the O, bitches. Acknowledge that we? are your betters in football accomplishments and I'll go easier on the beatdowns next time. The case has been laid out and the facts presented. The 2 undefeated seasons cancel each other out. The program with the most playoff wins is the more storied program. #QuookLogic is #WinningLogicPurpleJ said:Angry quook obk is best obk. Glad to see my comment spark some decent discussion around here lol

Quite literally the only thing Oregon is more storied in is Heisman winners. And yes, Marcus was amazing.
But even with a 12 year stretch of dominance by Oregon and Washington hitting the ultimate depths of hell, Oregon is still behind in every metric. -
No it isn't. Fuck that shit and everyone that regurgitates it. They haven't been relevant this decade at all. They are no different than any other PAC team until they are, and deserve no special consideration just because they're USC.Pitchfork51 said:Bunch of retards beating each other up
It's USC and then everyone else.
Oregon vs Washington is a dumb debate.
If you are over 40 I guess you think Washington is better and if you are under then Oregon is way better. -
*Defending Pac-12 Champions USCoregonblitzkrieg said:
No it isn't. Fuck that shit and everyone that regurgitates it. They haven't been relevant this decade at all. They are no different than any other PAC team until they are, and deserve no special consideration just because they're USC.Pitchfork51 said:Bunch of retards beating each other up
It's USC and then everyone else.
Oregon vs Washington is a dumb debate.
If you are over 40 I guess you think Washington is better and if you are under then Oregon is way better. -
I get that you like to suck their cock, you're a UW fan, that comes with the territory.PurpleJ said:
*Defending Pac-12 Champions USCoregonblitzkrieg said:
No it isn't. Fuck that shit and everyone that regurgitates it. They haven't been relevant this decade at all. They are no different than any other PAC team until they are, and deserve no special consideration just because they're USC.Pitchfork51 said:Bunch of retards beating each other up
It's USC and then everyone else.
Oregon vs Washington is a dumb debate.
If you are over 40 I guess you think Washington is better and if you are under then Oregon is way better. -
Real recognize realoregonblitzkrieg said:
I get that you like to suck their cock, you're a UW fan, that comes with the territory.PurpleJ said:
*Defending Pac-12 Champions USCoregonblitzkrieg said:
No it isn't. Fuck that shit and everyone that regurgitates it. They haven't been relevant this decade at all. They are no different than any other PAC team until they are, and deserve no special consideration just because they're USC.Pitchfork51 said:Bunch of retards beating each other up
It's USC and then everyone else.
Oregon vs Washington is a dumb debate.
If you are over 40 I guess you think Washington is better and if you are under then Oregon is way better.



