2018 Pac-12 Football Coach Rankings: Can Anyone Win a National Title?

haie · May 2018

PurpleJ said:

oregonblitzkrieg said:
Pete doesn't belong in the same sentence as Chip. Or in the same paragraph. Or on the same page. He's probably good enough to make it in the book though.
They are tied in national championships.

OBK counts National Semifinal victories as national championships.

oregonblitzkrieg · May 2018

haie said:

PurpleJ said:

oregonblitzkrieg said:
Pete doesn't belong in the same sentence as Chip. Or in the same paragraph. Or on the same page. He's probably good enough to make it in the book though.
They are tied in national championships.
OBK counts National Semifinal victories as national championships.

No, but they are measuring sticks. And they're sure as fuck more valuable than a voted 'natty' where the game was never even played on the field. UO is the only PAC team with a playoff victory so ducks can talk shit. UW has a loss. As well as a 2-12 record against UO the past 14 years. They can try to talk shit but its silly and embarrassing when they do.

Pitchfork51 · May 2018

oregonblitzkrieg said:

haie said:

PurpleJ said:

oregonblitzkrieg said:
Pete doesn't belong in the same sentence as Chip. Or in the same paragraph. Or on the same page. He's probably good enough to make it in the book though.
They are tied in national championships.
OBK counts National Semifinal victories as national championships.
No, but they are measuring sticks. And they're sure as fuck more valuable than a voted 'natty' where the game was never even played on the field. UO is the only PAC team with a playoff victory so ducks can talk shit. UW has a loss. They can try to talk shit but its silly and embarrassing when they do.

Hryk

backthepack · May 2018

oregonblitzkrieg said:

haie said:

PurpleJ said:

oregonblitzkrieg said:
Pete doesn't belong in the same sentence as Chip. Or in the same paragraph. Or on the same page. He's probably good enough to make it in the book though.
They are tied in national championships.
OBK counts National Semifinal victories as national championships.
No, but they are measuring sticks. And they're sure as fuck more valuable than a voted 'natty' where the game was never even played on the field. UO is the only PAC team with a playoff victory so ducks can talk shit. UW has a loss. As well as a 2-12 record against UO the past 14 years. They can try to talk shit but its silly and embarrassing when they do.

When you lose 70-21 and 38-3 in consecutive years, you really can't talk shit.

haie · May 2018

oregonblitzkrieg said:

haie said:

PurpleJ said:

oregonblitzkrieg said:
Pete doesn't belong in the same sentence as Chip. Or in the same paragraph. Or on the same page. He's probably good enough to make it in the book though.
They are tied in national championships.
OBK counts National Semifinal victories as national championships.
No, but they are measuring sticks. And they're sure as fuck more valuable than a voted 'natty' where the game was never even played on the field. UO is the only PAC team with a playoff victory so ducks can talk shit. UW has a loss. They can try to talk shit but its silly and embarrassing when they do.

If you actually think a national championship in 1991, after which your team steamrolled fucking everyone and didn’t lose a game is inferior to a semi final victory, after which your team lost to FUCKING ARIZONA AT HOME,

,

,

, you are simply serving me my next beer at a jack duck pub in Portland.

I’ll take a Starburst IPA next you strung out bottom feeder.

oregonblitzkrieg · May 2018

backthepack said:

oregonblitzkrieg said:

haie said:

PurpleJ said:

oregonblitzkrieg said:
Pete doesn't belong in the same sentence as Chip. Or in the same paragraph. Or on the same page. He's probably good enough to make it in the book though.
They are tied in national championships.
OBK counts National Semifinal victories as national championships.
No, but they are measuring sticks. And they're sure as fuck more valuable than a voted 'natty' where the game was never even played on the field. UO is the only PAC team with a playoff victory so ducks can talk shit. UW has a loss. As well as a 2-12 record against UO the past 14 years. They can try to talk shit but its silly and embarrassing when they do.
When you lose 70-21 and 38-3 in consecutive years, you really can't talk shit.

What are you & the rest of the Jonas Brothers going to do about it?

oregonblitzkrieg · May 2018

haie said:

oregonblitzkrieg said:

haie said:

PurpleJ said:

oregonblitzkrieg said:
Pete doesn't belong in the same sentence as Chip. Or in the same paragraph. Or on the same page. He's probably good enough to make it in the book though.
They are tied in national championships.
OBK counts National Semifinal victories as national championships.
No, but they are measuring sticks. And they're sure as fuck more valuable than a voted 'natty' where the game was never even played on the field. UO is the only PAC team with a playoff victory so ducks can talk shit. UW has a loss. They can try to talk shit but its silly and embarrassing when they do.
If you actually think a national championship in 1991, after which your team steamrolled fucking everyone and didn’t lose a game is inferior to a semi final victory, after which your team lost to FUCKING ARIZONA AT HOME,

,

,

, you are simply serving me my next beer at a jack duck pub in Portland.

I’ll take a Starburst IPA next you strung out bottom feeder.

An undefeated regular season is inferior to a playoff victory. HTH

haie · May 2018

oregonblitzkrieg said:

haie said:

oregonblitzkrieg said:

haie said:

PurpleJ said:

oregonblitzkrieg said:
Pete doesn't belong in the same sentence as Chip. Or in the same paragraph. Or on the same page. He's probably good enough to make it in the book though.
They are tied in national championships.
OBK counts National Semifinal victories as national championships.
No, but they are measuring sticks. And they're sure as fuck more valuable than a voted 'natty' where the game was never even played on the field. UO is the only PAC team with a playoff victory so ducks can talk shit. UW has a loss. They can try to talk shit but its silly and embarrassing when they do.
If you actually think a national championship in 1991, after which your team steamrolled fucking everyone and didn’t lose a game is inferior to a semi final victory, after which your team lost to FUCKING ARIZONA AT HOME,

,

,

, you are simply serving me my next beer at a jack duck pub in Portland.

I’ll take a Starburst IPA next you strung out bottom feeder.
An undefeated regular season is inferior to a playoff victory. HTH

So the Rose Bowl was a regular season game?

How did Oregon’s best team ever do in the regular season, at home, against Arizona?

dflea · May 2018

Pitchfork51 said:

oregonblitzkrieg said:

haie said:

PurpleJ said:

oregonblitzkrieg said:
Pete doesn't belong in the same sentence as Chip. Or in the same paragraph. Or on the same page. He's probably good enough to make it in the book though.
They are tied in national championships.
OBK counts National Semifinal victories as national championships.
No, but they are measuring sticks. And they're sure as fuck more valuable than a voted 'natty' where the game was never even played on the field. UO is the only PAC team with a playoff victory so ducks can talk shit. UW has a loss. They can try to talk shit but its silly and embarrassing when they do.
Hryk

lol

No he fucking isn't.

oregonblitzkrieg · May 2018

haie said:

oregonblitzkrieg said:

haie said:

oregonblitzkrieg said:

haie said:

PurpleJ said:

oregonblitzkrieg said:
Pete doesn't belong in the same sentence as Chip. Or in the same paragraph. Or on the same page. He's probably good enough to make it in the book though.
They are tied in national championships.
OBK counts National Semifinal victories as national championships.
No, but they are measuring sticks. And they're sure as fuck more valuable than a voted 'natty' where the game was never even played on the field. UO is the only PAC team with a playoff victory so ducks can talk shit. UW has a loss. They can try to talk shit but its silly and embarrassing when they do.
If you actually think a national championship in 1991, after which your team steamrolled fucking everyone and didn’t lose a game is inferior to a semi final victory, after which your team lost to FUCKING ARIZONA AT HOME,

,

,

, you are simply serving me my next beer at a jack duck pub in Portland.

I’ll take a Starburst IPA next you strung out bottom feeder.
An undefeated regular season is inferior to a playoff victory. HTH
So the Rose Bowl was a regular season game?

How did Oregon’s best team ever do in the regular season, at home, against Arizona?

Who gives a fuck. The Mosstercatz were obliterated in the PAC championship. And UO had already tied UW's achievements in 2010 with the undefeated regular season, which would have resulted in a 'half natty' back in the good old days.

dflea · May 2018

oregonblitzkrieg said:

haie said:

oregonblitzkrieg said:

haie said:

oregonblitzkrieg said:

haie said:

PurpleJ said:

oregonblitzkrieg said:
Pete doesn't belong in the same sentence as Chip. Or in the same paragraph. Or on the same page. He's probably good enough to make it in the book though.
They are tied in national championships.
OBK counts National Semifinal victories as national championships.
No, but they are measuring sticks. And they're sure as fuck more valuable than a voted 'natty' where the game was never even played on the field. UO is the only PAC team with a playoff victory so ducks can talk shit. UW has a loss. They can try to talk shit but its silly and embarrassing when they do.
If you actually think a national championship in 1991, after which your team steamrolled fucking everyone and didn’t lose a game is inferior to a semi final victory, after which your team lost to FUCKING ARIZONA AT HOME,

,

,

, you are simply serving me my next beer at a jack duck pub in Portland.

I’ll take a Starburst IPA next you strung out bottom feeder.
An undefeated regular season is inferior to a playoff victory. HTH
So the Rose Bowl was a regular season game?

How did Oregon’s best team ever do in the regular season, at home, against Arizona?
Who gives a fuck. The Mosstercatz were obliterated in the PAC championship. And UO had already tied UW's achievements in 2010 with the undefeated regular season, which would have resulted in a 'half natty' back in the good old days.

Regular season?

Is that first loser speak for losing the big game?

haie · May 2018

oregonblitzkrieg said:

haie said:

oregonblitzkrieg said:

haie said:

oregonblitzkrieg said:

haie said:

PurpleJ said:

oregonblitzkrieg said:
Pete doesn't belong in the same sentence as Chip. Or in the same paragraph. Or on the same page. He's probably good enough to make it in the book though.
They are tied in national championships.
OBK counts National Semifinal victories as national championships.
No, but they are measuring sticks. And they're sure as fuck more valuable than a voted 'natty' where the game was never even played on the field. UO is the only PAC team with a playoff victory so ducks can talk shit. UW has a loss. They can try to talk shit but its silly and embarrassing when they do.
If you actually think a national championship in 1991, after which your team steamrolled fucking everyone and didn’t lose a game is inferior to a semi final victory, after which your team lost to FUCKING ARIZONA AT HOME,

,

,

, you are simply serving me my next beer at a jack duck pub in Portland.

I’ll take a Starburst IPA next you strung out bottom feeder.
An undefeated regular season is inferior to a playoff victory. HTH
So the Rose Bowl was a regular season game?

How did Oregon’s best team ever do in the regular season, at home, against Arizona?
Who gives a fuck. The Mosstercatz were obliterated in the PAC championship. And UO had already tied UW's achievements in 2010 with the undefeated regular season, which would have resulted in a 'half natty' back in the good old days.

Because you’re talking about all time greatness and your best team ever, with their best player ever, lost to Arizona at home.

UW steamraped their way through an entire season plus bowl game against a traditionally good program.

The fact ducks and cougs can’t admit these facts makes them massive fucking homos.

Otherwise yeah, 2014, win over complacent FSU and jimboo, yeahhh, quook on young bud tender...

oregonblitzkrieg · May 2018

I get why you guys cling to the voted natty. I would too if my team had never made it to the championship game and I needed something to make my team look relevant compared to the team that came from out of nowhere and KILLED IT on the national stage for YEARS. Guarantee if you ever win a real title on the field, that title will be far more valuable to you than a voted title from a bygone era where championship games didn't exist.

UW_Doog_Bot · May 2018

oregonblitzkrieg said:
I get why you guys cling to the voted natty. I would too if my team had never made it to the championship game and I needed something to make my team look relevant compared to the team that came from out of nowhere and KILLED IT on the national stage for YEARS. Guarantee if you ever win a real title on the field, that title will be far more valuable to you than a voted title from a bygone era where championship games didn't exist.

Quooks living in the past.

oregonblitzkrieg · May 2018

haie said:

oregonblitzkrieg said:

haie said:

oregonblitzkrieg said:

haie said:

oregonblitzkrieg said:

haie said:

PurpleJ said:

oregonblitzkrieg said:
Pete doesn't belong in the same sentence as Chip. Or in the same paragraph. Or on the same page. He's probably good enough to make it in the book though.
They are tied in national championships.
OBK counts National Semifinal victories as national championships.
No, but they are measuring sticks. And they're sure as fuck more valuable than a voted 'natty' where the game was never even played on the field. UO is the only PAC team with a playoff victory so ducks can talk shit. UW has a loss. They can try to talk shit but its silly and embarrassing when they do.
If you actually think a national championship in 1991, after which your team steamrolled fucking everyone and didn’t lose a game is inferior to a semi final victory, after which your team lost to FUCKING ARIZONA AT HOME,

,

,

, you are simply serving me my next beer at a jack duck pub in Portland.

I’ll take a Starburst IPA next you strung out bottom feeder.
An undefeated regular season is inferior to a playoff victory. HTH
So the Rose Bowl was a regular season game?

How did Oregon’s best team ever do in the regular season, at home, against Arizona?
Who gives a fuck. The Mosstercatz were obliterated in the PAC championship. And UO had already tied UW's achievements in 2010 with the undefeated regular season, which would have resulted in a 'half natty' back in the good old days.
Because you’re talking about all time greatness and your best team ever, with their best player ever, lost to Arizona at home.

UW steamraped their way through an entire season plus bowl game against a traditionally good program.

The fact ducks and cougs can’t admit these facts makes them massive fucking homos.

Otherwise yeah, 2014, win over complacent FSU and jimboo, yeahhh, quook on young bud tender...

Play the Canes or GTFO

dflea · May 2018

oregonblitzkrieg said:
I get why you guys cling to the voted natty. I would too if my team had never made it to the championship game and I needed something to make my team look relevant compared to the team that came from out of nowhere and KILLED IT on the national stage for YEARS. Guarantee if you ever win a real title on the field, that title will be far more valuable to you than a voted title from a bygone era where championship games didn't exist.

We get why you don't, loser.

It's because Oregon lost the big game and the Ducks' big-time push at football relevance fizzled out short of being champions. So they're just losers, not semi-final winners. Nobody gives even a small fuck about a semi.

Fuck off.

Pitchfork51 · May 2018

Although losing to Arizona should always invalidate your whole season.

Baseman · May 2018

oregonblitzkrieg said:
Pete doesn't belong in the same sentence as Chip. Or in the same paragraph. Or on the same page. He's probably good enough to make it in the book though.

OBK has a point. Slingblade won that semi game with Chip’s guys

oregonblitzkrieg · May 2018

dflea said:

oregonblitzkrieg said:
I get why you guys cling to the voted natty. I would too if my team had never made it to the championship game and I needed something to make my team look relevant compared to the team that came from out of nowhere and KILLED IT on the national stage for YEARS. Guarantee if you ever win a real title on the field, that title will be far more valuable to you than a voted title from a bygone era where championship games didn't exist.
We get why you don't, loser.

It's because Oregon lost the big game and the Ducks' big-time push at football relevance fizzled out short of being champions. So they're just losers, not semi-final winners. Nobody gives even a small fuck about a semi.

Fuck off.

Pete agrees.

PurpleJ · May 2018

Angry quook obk is best obk. Glad to see my comment spark some decent discussion around here lol

dtd · May 2018

YellowSnow said:

PurpleJ said:
Imagine Chip at USC...

BRB, JO

dtd · May 2018

2001400ex said:

YellowSnow said:

PurpleJ said:
Imagine Chip at USC...

Too many Asians.

180k?

I don't even remember how you faggots work any more.

oregonblitzkrieg · May 2018

PurpleJ said:
Angry quook obk is best obk. Glad to see my comment spark some decent discussion around here lol

I'm not even charged to half quook. Bow down and recognize the accomplishments of the O, bitches. Acknowledge that we? are your betters in football accomplishments and I'll go easier on the beatdowns next time. The case has been laid out and the facts presented. The 2 undefeated seasons cancel each other out. The program with the most playoff wins is the more storied program. #QuookLogic is #WinningLogic

DoogCourics · May 2018

oregonblitzkrieg said:

PurpleJ said:
Angry quook obk is best obk. Glad to see my comment spark some decent discussion around here lol
I'm not even charged to half quook. Bow down and recognize the accomplishments of the O, bitches. Acknowledge that we? are your betters in football accomplishments and I'll go easier on the beatdowns next time. The case has been laid out and the facts presented. The 2 undefeated seasons cancel each other out. The program with the most playoff wins is the more storied program. #QuookLogic is #WinningLogic

Quite literally the only thing Oregon is more storied in is Heisman winners. And yes, Marcus was amazing.

But even with a 12 year stretch of dominance by Oregon and Washington hitting the ultimate depths of hell, Oregon is still behind in every metric.

oregonblitzkrieg · May 2018

DoogCourics said:

oregonblitzkrieg said:

PurpleJ said:
Angry quook obk is best obk. Glad to see my comment spark some decent discussion around here lol
I'm not even charged to half quook. Bow down and recognize the accomplishments of the O, bitches. Acknowledge that we? are your betters in football accomplishments and I'll go easier on the beatdowns next time. The case has been laid out and the facts presented. The 2 undefeated seasons cancel each other out. The program with the most playoff wins is the more storied program. #QuookLogic is #WinningLogic

Quite literally the only thing Oregon is more storied in is Heisman winners. And yes, Marcus was amazing.

But even with a 12 year stretch of dominance by Oregon and Washington hitting the ultimate depths of hell, Oregon is still behind in every metric.

No category for playoff wins in this display. GTF outta here with this doog shit. Win/loss records, NFL drafts picks, weeks at #1 etc., none of that matters. Only playoff wins & national championships (which require playoff wins in the modern era) matter. UO has 1 playoff win. UW has zero playoff wins. UO played in 2 natty games. UW has never played in one. UW has half a voted natty. UO matched that accomplishment in 2010 with an undefeated season. In short, UO will be the dominant program until UW gets a playoff win. Then both programs will be on equal footing again.

backthepack · May 2018

oregonblitzkrieg said:

DoogCourics said:

oregonblitzkrieg said:

PurpleJ said:
Angry quook obk is best obk. Glad to see my comment spark some decent discussion around here lol
I'm not even charged to half quook. Bow down and recognize the accomplishments of the O, bitches. Acknowledge that we? are your betters in football accomplishments and I'll go easier on the beatdowns next time. The case has been laid out and the facts presented. The 2 undefeated seasons cancel each other out. The program with the most playoff wins is the more storied program. #QuookLogic is #WinningLogic

Quite literally the only thing Oregon is more storied in is Heisman winners. And yes, Marcus was amazing.

But even with a 12 year stretch of dominance by Oregon and Washington hitting the ultimate depths of hell, Oregon is still behind in every metric.
No category for playoff wins in this display. GTF outta here with this doog shit. Win/loss records, NFL drafts picks, weeks at #1 etc., none of that matters. Only playoff wins & national championships (which require playoff wins in the modern era) matter. UO has 1 playoff win. UW has zero playoff wins. UO played in 2 natty games. UW has never played in one. UW has half a voted natty. UO matched that accomplishment in 2010 with an undefeated season. In short, UO will be the dominant program until UW gets a playoff win. Then both programs will be on equal footing again.

Your football program is currently in hospice care. It's ok brotha QOOCK THE FUCK ON!!!!1!!

whatshouldicareabout · May 2018

oregonblitzkrieg said:
In short, UO will be the dominant program until UW gets a playoff win. Then both programs will be on equal footing again.

Is this the greatest quook line in history?

UWhuskytskeet · May 2018

whatshouldicareabout said:

oregonblitzkrieg said:
In short, UO will be the dominant program until UW gets a playoff win. Then both programs will be on equal footing again.
Is this the greatest quook line in history?

It's up there.

http://hardcorehusky.com/discussion/17474/oregon-will-be-back-in-the-playoff-soon/p1

Swaye · May 2018

oregonblitzkrieg said:

DoogCourics said:

oregonblitzkrieg said:

PurpleJ said:
Angry quook obk is best obk. Glad to see my comment spark some decent discussion around here lol
I'm not even charged to half quook. Bow down and recognize the accomplishments of the O, bitches. Acknowledge that we? are your betters in football accomplishments and I'll go easier on the beatdowns next time. The case has been laid out and the facts presented. The 2 undefeated seasons cancel each other out. The program with the most playoff wins is the more storied program. #QuookLogic is #WinningLogic

Quite literally the only thing Oregon is more storied in is Heisman winners. And yes, Marcus was amazing.

But even with a 12 year stretch of dominance by Oregon and Washington hitting the ultimate depths of hell, Oregon is still behind in every metric.
No category for playoff wins in this display. GTF outta here with this doog shit. Win/loss records, NFL drafts picks, weeks at #1 etc., none of that matters. Only playoff wins & national championships (which require playoff wins in the modern era) matter. UO has 1 playoff win. UW has zero playoff wins. UO played in 2 natty games. UW has never played in one. UW has half a voted natty. UO matched that accomplishment in 2010 with an undefeated season. In short, UO will be the dominant program until UW gets a playoff win. Then both programs will be on equal footing again.

I know you are trolling, because nobody but Hondo can be this stupid.

FireCohen · May 2018

Aids is strong in this thread

2018 Pac-12 Football Coach Rankings: Can Anyone Win a National Title?

Comments