2018 Pac-12 Football Coach Rankings: Can Anyone Win a National Title?

haie said:

PurpleJ said:

oregonblitzkrieg said:

Pete doesn't belong in the same sentence as Chip. Or in the same paragraph. Or on the same page. He's probably good enough to make it in the book though.

They are tied in national championships.

OBK counts National Semifinal victories as national championships.

No, but they are measuring sticks. And they're sure as fuck more valuable than a voted 'natty' where the game was never even played on the field. UO is the only PAC team with a playoff victory so ducks can talk shit. UW has a loss. As well as a 2-12 record against UO the past 14 years. They can try to talk shit but its silly and embarrassing when they do.

oregonblitzkrieg said:

haie said:

PurpleJ said:

oregonblitzkrieg said:

Pete doesn't belong in the same sentence as Chip. Or in the same paragraph. Or on the same page. He's probably good enough to make it in the book though.

They are tied in national championships.

OBK counts National Semifinal victories as national championships.

No, but they are measuring sticks. And they're sure as fuck more valuable than a voted 'natty' where the game was never even played on the field. UO is the only PAC team with a playoff victory so ducks can talk shit. UW has a loss. As well as a 2-12 record against UO the past 14 years. They can try to talk shit but its silly and embarrassing when they do.

When you lose 70-21 and 38-3 in consecutive years, you really can't talk shit.

backthepack said:

oregonblitzkrieg said:

haie said:

PurpleJ said:

oregonblitzkrieg said:

Pete doesn't belong in the same sentence as Chip. Or in the same paragraph. Or on the same page. He's probably good enough to make it in the book though.

They are tied in national championships.

OBK counts National Semifinal victories as national championships.

No, but they are measuring sticks. And they're sure as fuck more valuable than a voted 'natty' where the game was never even played on the field. UO is the only PAC team with a playoff victory so ducks can talk shit. UW has a loss. As well as a 2-12 record against UO the past 14 years. They can try to talk shit but its silly and embarrassing when they do.

When you lose 70-21 and 38-3 in consecutive years, you really can't talk shit.

What are you & the rest of the Jonas Brothers going to do about it?

haie said:

oregonblitzkrieg said:

haie said:

oregonblitzkrieg said:

haie said:

PurpleJ said:

oregonblitzkrieg said:

Pete doesn't belong in the same sentence as Chip. Or in the same paragraph. Or on the same page. He's probably good enough to make it in the book though.

They are tied in national championships.

OBK counts National Semifinal victories as national championships.

No, but they are measuring sticks. And they're sure as fuck more valuable than a voted 'natty' where the game was never even played on the field. UO is the only PAC team with a playoff victory so ducks can talk shit. UW has a loss. They can try to talk shit but its silly and embarrassing when they do.

If you actually think a national championship in 1991, after which your team steamrolled fucking everyone and didn’t lose a game is inferior to a semi final victory, after which your team lost to FUCKING ARIZONA AT HOME,

,

,

, you are simply serving me my next beer at a jack duck pub in Portland.

I’ll take a Starburst IPA next you strung out bottom feeder.

An undefeated regular season is inferior to a playoff victory. HTH

So the Rose Bowl was a regular season game?

How did Oregon’s best team ever do in the regular season, at home, against Arizona?

Who gives a fuck. The Mosstercatz were obliterated in the PAC championship. And UO had already tied UW's achievements in 2010 with the undefeated regular season, which would have resulted in a 'half natty' back in the good old days.