String to TE, DD to linebacker, that leaves Ross

I don't have a day job Mick Diamond. I live in a cardboard box and sell shredded tire remains along the I-5 median in rural Thurston County.

puppylove_sugarsteel said:

So Ross is our only prayer for a #2-3 WR. String will be a 6-3 245lb TE/HB, Daniels a linebacker....When is Sark EVER going to find the pieces to formulate a balanced offense?

Sark has not assembled ONE solid position group. The o-line is a mess, The TE group is thin and worthless, The tailback group is 1- deep, The massive wide receiver group is 1-deep, there are defensive ends littered all over the roster, yet we can't find one to get to the quarterback. We have one interior defensive lineman. Sark has recruited a ton of linebackers, And three of them and only 3 are zpac12 worthy, we have to move corners to safety because we have zero safeties on the roster, and we are only two deep a corner.

Where are all of Sark's top 25 classes at? Where are the players who have comprised these classes? Mike Riley has a solid 2-deep roster, as does Stanford, Oregon etc...

Sark turns his players over so often he can never form a 2-3 deep. Not a good way to build a program. Are 7-6 seasons a result? You do the math!

Looks like you're starting to catch-on to what some of us mean by Sark's slows while struggling with a steep learning curve. Sark came to us with no-nada-zero head coaching credentials and at best an offensive coordinator resume to his credit at a school (USC) where your grandma could game plan and call plays capable of making yards and scoring TDs. Beyond hope, I'm not sure what we should have expected.

Sark completely overhauled his defensive staff before last season and that appears to have paid off so far with significant improvement on that side of the ball in 2012. Before that shakeup, however, Sark's defense could not have gotten worse. Changes in Sark's offensive staff this past offseason might bring similar improvement........ at least we can hope so.

GRUNDLE STOp