New York Times wins the Dave Samek Profiles in Courage Award
All these years they said nothing about Weinstein. But when the tide turned and it was safe to pile on, then they began their exposes. And now their colleagues award them for their courageous work. Ridiculous and pathetic.
https://apnews.com/d3139792c89b4e06942b26d6c3c8bbe8/Times,-New-Yorker-win-Pulitzer-for-Weinstein-scandal
https://apnews.com/d3139792c89b4e06942b26d6c3c8bbe8/Times,-New-Yorker-win-Pulitzer-for-Weinstein-scandal
Comments
Sort by:
1 - 15 of
151
“When the tide turned and it was safe to pile on”
If I remember correctly it was their Weinstein story that started the me too movement.
If I remember correctly it was their Weinstein story that started the me too movement.
Updated by DerekJohnson
“When the tide turned and it was safe to pile on”The groundswell was already occurring. Forty people in that industry watched Weinstein walk out of a room with a 16 year old girl and nobody stepped up and did or said anything.
If I remember correctly it was their Weinstein story that started the me too movement.
And that was the NY times fault?“When the tide turned and it was safe to pile on”The groundswell was already occurring. Forty people in that industry watched Weinstein walk out of a room with a 16 year old girl and nobody stepped up and did or said anything.
If I remember correctly it was their Weinstein story that started the me too movement.
YKW. She's probably 18 by now. Can even round up from 17 1/2.“When the tide turned and it was safe to pile on”The groundswell was already occurring. Forty people in that industry watched Weinstein walk out of a room with a 16 year old girl and nobody stepped up and did or said anything.
If I remember correctly it was their Weinstein story that started the me too movement.
Look at her bush, she got hair..YKW. She's probably 18 by now. Can even round up from 17 1/2.“When the tide turned and it was safe to pile on”The groundswell was already occurring. Forty people in that industry watched Weinstein walk out of a room with a 16 year old girl and nobody stepped up and did or said anything.
If I remember correctly it was their Weinstein story that started the me too movement.
That’s a fucking retarded post Derek.“When the tide turned and it was safe to pile on”The groundswell was already occurring. Forty people in that industry watched Weinstein walk out of a room with a 16 year old girl and nobody stepped up and did or said anything.
If I remember correctly it was their Weinstein story that started the me too movement.
What industry? The newspaper industry? Or Hollywood? Or they’re all the same to you?
Small town newspaper “writer” jealousy.
It’s disingenuous to say that the groundswell was occurring when they were the ones that started it. Then Louis CK, Charlie Rose, Matt Lauer etc.“When the tide turned and it was safe to pile on”The groundswell was already occurring. Forty people in that industry watched Weinstein walk out of a room with a 16 year old girl and nobody stepped up and did or said anything.
If I remember correctly it was their Weinstein story that started the me too movement.
The story wasn’t just about Weinstein’s crimes but his ability to silence accusers due to his powerful status. He hired ex-Mossad agents to prevent the victims from talking to the media. So your criticism is that the NYT didn’t get that story earlier? Ok then how about the failures of every other media outlet especially those in LA or those that cover Hollywood?
Sounds like you've never taken that pussy.It’s disingenuous to say that the groundswell was occurring when they were the ones that started it. Then Louis CK, Charlie Rose, Matt Lauer etc.“When the tide turned and it was safe to pile on”The groundswell was already occurring. Forty people in that industry watched Weinstein walk out of a room with a 16 year old girl and nobody stepped up and did or said anything.
If I remember correctly it was their Weinstein story that started the me too movement.
The story wasn’t just about Weinstein’s crimes but his ability to silence accusers due to his powerful status. He hired ex-Mossad agents to prevent the victims from talking to the media. So your criticism is that the NYT didn’t get that story earlier? Ok then how about the failures of every other media outlet especially those in LA or those that cover Hollywood?
Because sometimes uze got tu take that pussy.
NBS sat on the story which kind of blows the apologists out of the waterNational Boy Stockers?
NBS sat on the story which kind of blows the apologists out of the waterI'm socked Fox news didn't break the story earlier. I thought they were the real journalists.
FTFYNBS sat on the story which kind of blows the apologists out of the waterI'm a loadsocked Fox news didn't break the story earlier. I thought they were the real journalists.
Updated by Pitchfork51
Wtf is the point of being powerful if you can't use that power to fuck hot Tang and silence them afterwards
Otherwise he'd have to go the other route and not look like a disgusting piece of shit
Otherwise he'd have to go the other route and not look like a disgusting piece of shit