How is Larry Scott a shitty commissioner? Update
Comments
-
Pumpy good at everything.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
I thought 5 was worst. Ok defcon 2 then. Defcon 1 would be no network dude. Nobody wants thatPurpleBaze said:
Defcon 4? Try Defcon 1, poopy.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
You are right Green. Scott is really hurting this conference. It's at Defcon 4, and that should worry everybody concernedGreenRiverGatorz said:
Everyone in the conference should care. Our allocated revenue from the TV contracts continue to fall well below initial projections, and we still have a game or two every year that is shown on this network that allegedly exists, which hurts our profile.Meek said:it's actually at the point where the entire thing is no longer frustrating but just like we're watching a police chase on live tv where you wonder how much longer this guy can keep going with this network.
literally the only fans who can possibly continue to care about the Pac12 Networks are the ones whose teams are the conference drecks that can't get on ESPN or FS1, but those schools are tiny and inconsequential so really there is nothing about Scott's strategy that matters to any of the fans.
Every now and then Wilner would poast something about the "great studio shows on the Pac12 Network"....I had the network for 3 years and I could never figure out when these shows were...i don't think they were consistently scheduled so, again, nobody cares.
Anyway, Wilner did a column on these numbers a couple days ago and what caught my eye was that literally the 2 worst performing networks were Pac12 and the Tennis Channel...that made me laugh. -
Truck racing > motorcycle racingFire_Marshall_Bill said:Bein Sports shows motorcycle racing and tape delayed French soccer. Tough to beat that
-
dnc said:
Truck racing > motorcycle racingFire_Marshall_Bill said:Bein Sports shows motorcycle racing and tape delayed French soccer. Tough to beat that
yes -
Call up the World Fishing Network pres and don't hang up until they say yes.
-
It’s like revenge of the nerds around here.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
I thought 5 was worst. Ok defcon 2 then. Defcon 1 would be no network dude. Nobody wants thatPurpleBaze said:
Defcon 4? Try Defcon 1, poopy.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
You are right Green. Scott is really hurting this conference. It's at Defcon 4, and that should worry everybody concernedGreenRiverGatorz said:
Everyone in the conference should care. Our allocated revenue from the TV contracts continue to fall well below initial projections, and we still have a game or two every year that is shown on this network that allegedly exists, which hurts our profile.Meek said:it's actually at the point where the entire thing is no longer frustrating but just like we're watching a police chase on live tv where you wonder how much longer this guy can keep going with this network.
literally the only fans who can possibly continue to care about the Pac12 Networks are the ones whose teams are the conference drecks that can't get on ESPN or FS1, but those schools are tiny and inconsequential so really there is nothing about Scott's strategy that matters to any of the fans.
Every now and then Wilner would poast something about the "great studio shows on the Pac12 Network"....I had the network for 3 years and I could never figure out when these shows were...i don't think they were consistently scheduled so, again, nobody cares.
Anyway, Wilner did a column on these numbers a couple days ago and what caught my eye was that literally the 2 worst performing networks were Pac12 and the Tennis Channel...that made me laugh. -
shit gets lame as fuck here when uw is winning.CirrhosisDawg said:
It’s like revenge of the nerds around here.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
I thought 5 was worst. Ok defcon 2 then. Defcon 1 would be no network dude. Nobody wants thatPurpleBaze said:
Defcon 4? Try Defcon 1, poopy.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
You are right Green. Scott is really hurting this conference. It's at Defcon 4, and that should worry everybody concernedGreenRiverGatorz said:
Everyone in the conference should care. Our allocated revenue from the TV contracts continue to fall well below initial projections, and we still have a game or two every year that is shown on this network that allegedly exists, which hurts our profile.Meek said:it's actually at the point where the entire thing is no longer frustrating but just like we're watching a police chase on live tv where you wonder how much longer this guy can keep going with this network.
literally the only fans who can possibly continue to care about the Pac12 Networks are the ones whose teams are the conference drecks that can't get on ESPN or FS1, but those schools are tiny and inconsequential so really there is nothing about Scott's strategy that matters to any of the fans.
Every now and then Wilner would poast something about the "great studio shows on the Pac12 Network"....I had the network for 3 years and I could never figure out when these shows were...i don't think they were consistently scheduled so, again, nobody cares.
Anyway, Wilner did a column on these numbers a couple days ago and what caught my eye was that literally the 2 worst performing networks were Pac12 and the Tennis Channel...that made me laugh. -
Well pup isnt a nerdy little fuck so there is no reason to know that. I wasnt a nerdy little fuck when ferris beuller took us to defcon 2 either...I could see you little turds watching that movie in early 80's and getting all excited ... pup was busy going up shirts and touching a little fuz back then. You little geekies didnt do that for another 20 yearsSwaye said:
-
Tony Jones's ass hair?puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Well pup isnt a nerdy little fuck so there is no reason to know that. I wasnt a nerdy little fuck when ferris beuller took us to defcon 2 either...I could see you little turds watching that movie in early 80's and getting all excited ... pup was busy going up shirts and touching a little fuz back then. You little geekies didnt do that for another 20 yearsSwaye said: -
Ferris Bueller’s Day Off was released in 1986, the same year Judas Priest released Turbo Lover, the same year Pumpy was eight.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Well pup isnt a nerdy little fuck so there is no reason to know that. I wasnt a nerdy little fuck when ferris beuller took us to defcon 2 either...I could see you little turds watching that movie in early 80's and getting all excited ... pup was busy going up shirts and touching a little fuz back then. You little geekies didnt do that for another 20 yearsSwaye said:
Pumpy: Pimp or Pinocchio?
-
I think the ancient mariner is talking about War Games...Baseman said:
Ferris Bueller’s Day Off was released in 1986, the same year Judas Priest released Turbo Lover, the same year Pumpy was eight.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Well pup isnt a nerdy little fuck so there is no reason to know that. I wasnt a nerdy little fuck when ferris beuller took us to defcon 2 either...I could see you little turds watching that movie in early 80's and getting all excited ... pup was busy going up shirts and touching a little fuz back then. You little geekies didnt do that for another 20 yearsSwaye said:
Pumpy: Pimp or Pinocchio? -
The sad thing is given what we are getting for the channel per subscriber, they still can't make a fucking deal with DirecTV
-
@Dennis_DeYoung true????Pitchfork51 said:
shit gets lame as fuck here when uw is winning.CirrhosisDawg said:
It’s like revenge of the nerds around here.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
I thought 5 was worst. Ok defcon 2 then. Defcon 1 would be no network dude. Nobody wants thatPurpleBaze said:
Defcon 4? Try Defcon 1, poopy.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
You are right Green. Scott is really hurting this conference. It's at Defcon 4, and that should worry everybody concernedGreenRiverGatorz said:
Everyone in the conference should care. Our allocated revenue from the TV contracts continue to fall well below initial projections, and we still have a game or two every year that is shown on this network that allegedly exists, which hurts our profile.Meek said:it's actually at the point where the entire thing is no longer frustrating but just like we're watching a police chase on live tv where you wonder how much longer this guy can keep going with this network.
literally the only fans who can possibly continue to care about the Pac12 Networks are the ones whose teams are the conference drecks that can't get on ESPN or FS1, but those schools are tiny and inconsequential so really there is nothing about Scott's strategy that matters to any of the fans.
Every now and then Wilner would poast something about the "great studio shows on the Pac12 Network"....I had the network for 3 years and I could never figure out when these shows were...i don't think they were consistently scheduled so, again, nobody cares.
Anyway, Wilner did a column on these numbers a couple days ago and what caught my eye was that literally the 2 worst performing networks were Pac12 and the Tennis Channel...that made me laugh. -
I’m serious - if the PAC-12 Presidents and chancellors had any smarts they’d shitcan Larry and put Tits Cohen in charge.
-
She is doing an incredible job.CheersWestDawg said:I’m serious - if the PAC-12 Presidents and chancellors had any smarts they’d shitcan Larry and put Tits Cohen in charge.
-
And does have huge tits. So everyone wins!DerekJohnson said:
She is doing an incredible job.CheersWestDawg said:I’m serious - if the PAC-12 Presidents and chancellors had any smarts they’d shitcan Larry and put Tits Cohen in charge.
-
I had the channel for 3 years and I can tell you that there is zero watchable tv for guys like us on it....it goes beyond boring because it is 99% replays of games I didn't want to watch when they were on the first time.Tequilla said:The sad thing is given what we are getting for the channel per subscriber, they still can't make a fucking deal with DirecTV
The model is wrong if the target audience is humans. -
The target audience is China, who never had an opportunity to watch 2004 Oregon State vs. Arizona until now.Meek said:
I had the channel for 3 years and I can tell you that there is zero watchable tv for guys like us on it....it goes beyond boring because it is 99% replays of games I didn't want to watch when they were on the first time.Tequilla said:The sad thing is given what we are getting for the channel per subscriber, they still can't make a fucking deal with DirecTV
The model is wrong if the target audience is humans. -
And with the cord cutting going on, and people under 25 less interested in watching sports in general, many tv insiders believe sports tv deal $ has peaked.salemcoog said:The two biggest mistakes were made out of the gate.
Insisting that the PAC 12, who had no experience nor clue on how to own, market or run a TV network, own market and operate a TV network.
Not doing what it took to get Directv on board at the very beginning, when Comcast signed on.
Now it's time to sell it to FSN or NBC/COMCAST, or it will eventually get to a point where it will COST the conference $$$ to keep the lights on.
The conference will start negotiating their next tv deal in 2022. If they are allready down to a dime per subscriber, what could it be by then, and then as salemcoog says, it could cost the Pac-12 money to put their programming on tv.
when Larry made the deal his brilliant strategy was to keep all the content in house so the Pac-12 owned it.
What he failed to realize is 100% of nothing (which is what the Pac-12 network is worth) is still nothing -
The SEC network is .10 more than FS1
Holy fuck all -
Then who the fuck would run UW? She is the first decent AD we had in decadesCheersWestDawg said:I’m serious - if the PAC-12 Presidents and chancellors had any smarts they’d shitcan Larry and put Tits Cohen in charge.
-
hire jen!WeakarmCobra said:
Then who the fuck would run UW? She is the first decent AD we had in decadesCheersWestDawg said:I’m serious - if the PAC-12 Presidents and chancellors had any smarts they’d shitcan Larry and put Tits Cohen in charge.
frankly idk if anyone can do anything with the pac network. no one gives a fuck about football out west.
