Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
How is Larry Scott a shitty commissioner? Update
UWhuskytskeet
Member Posts: 7,113
http://awfulannouncing.com/league-networks/pac-12-networks-average-carriage-fee-down-63-per-cent-since-2012.html
Here is the average rate each network charges providers:
In 2012, the Big Ten commanded $0.37 per subscriber, while the Pac-12 National network received $0.30. By 2017, the Big Ten’s average sub fee had jumped to $0.48, an increase of 30 percent, while the Pac-12 fee had dropped to $0.11. That’s right: From $0.30 to $0.11 in the five-year span.
Here is the average rate each network charges providers:
- ESPN - $7.54
- NFL Network - $1.48
- ESPN2 - $0.94
- SEC - $0.74
- Fox Sports 1 - $0.64
- FOX College Sports - $0.50
- BTN - $0.48
- Golf Channel - $0.41
- NHL Network - $0.34
- NBCSN - $0.34
- NBA TV - $0.31
- Olympic Channel - $0.30
- MLB Network - $0.29
- ESPNews - $0.29
- CBS Sports Network - $0.28
- ESPNU - $0.25
- ESPN Classic - $0.25
- Fox Sports 2 - $0.21
- Tennis Channel - $0.14
- World Fishing Network - $0.14
- beIN Sports - $0.13
- Pac-12 Network - $0.11
- The Sportsman Channel - $0.06
- Outdoor Channel - $0.06
- Outside Television - $0.05
Channel - Rate
Comments
-
But how much is it per subscriber in China?
-
Can you convert those figures to yuan please?
-
Damn you're 5.1
-
Yuan penny.
-
I blame @steelheader2UWhuskytskeet said:In 2012, the Big Ten commanded $0.37 per subscriber, while the Pac-12 National network received $0.30. By 2017, the Big Ten’s average sub fee had jumped to $0.48, an increase of 30 percent, while the Pac-12 fee had dropped to $0.11. That’s right: From $0.30 to $0.11 in the five-year span.
Here is the average rate each network charges providers:- World Fishing Network - $0.14
- Pac-12 Network - $0.11
Channel - Rate - World Fishing Network - $0.14
-
it's actually at the point where the entire thing is no longer frustrating but just like we're watching a police chase on live tv where you wonder how much longer this guy can keep going with this network.
literally the only fans who can possibly continue to care about the Pac12 Networks are the ones whose teams are the conference drecks that can't get on ESPN or FS1, but those schools are tiny and inconsequential so really there is nothing about Scott's strategy that matters to any of the fans.
Every now and then Wilner would poast something about the "great studio shows on the Pac12 Network"....I had the network for 3 years and I could never figure out when these shows were...i don't think they were consistently scheduled so, again, nobody cares.
Anyway, Wilner did a column on these numbers a couple days ago and what caught my eye was that literally the 2 worst performing networks were Pac12 and the Tennis Channel...that made me laugh. -
I’d like to see some of you wear a fancy suit and negotiate with cable companies if it’s so easy....
-
Every year I get a performance review based on a comparison to my peers. I had no idea I could request the comparison be against some doog in his mom’s basement. Fuck...CuntWaffle said:I’d like to see some of you wear a fancy suit and negotiate with cable companies if it’s so easy....
-
The tennis channel is where it's at.
-
As a proud tennis dad I agree.2001400ex said:The tennis channel is where it's at.
But seriously, no one except crazy random tennis fans in the US watches it, and somehow it is more valuable than Larry's chinnovative network. And yet I can get the tennis channel on cable where I live in the metropolitan area of the capital of the cuntry. But no P12 network option through cable.
