Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Adidas is pitching UW today

1235»

Comments

  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,045
    Dennis_DeYoung said:

    USMChawk said:

    UWhuskytskeet said:

    USMChawk said:

    Bread said:

    Just dropped by my local middle school. Champion is the hot brand with the next generation. If we want to be a power house in the 2020s we better switch to Champion.

    This is true. I had a $7.00 Champion sweatshirt, from the early 90’s, that I wore when I was leaving the gym or doing yard work; it’s pretty ratty. My 16 year old daughter discovered it in an old gym bag and now wears it nonstop. It’s amazing how many compliments her friends give her.

    Pics.
    Sure.







    Glad you got a pic in with your lover. You must be really happy. I’d fuck you both. Hard.

    Pretty smile!
    I know that guy! I actually do! His D went to school with one of mine. Holy shit.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BennyBeaver
    BennyBeaver Member Posts: 13,346
    BleachedAnusDawg said:

    Tequilla said:

    Tequilla said:

    I’ve always tended to like Adidas products a little better ... although Nike generally owns the basketball shoe market.

    Personally, I’d like to see us disassociate with Nike purely because of the Knight/Oregon relationship. Both Nike/Adidas are HQ’ed in Portland and I could see a deal with UW being a strategic priority for Adidas.

    Given that Nike didn’t make a realistic offer outside of re-upping at essentially the existing terms, Adidas COULD have gotten away with a slightly less attractive offer than what they made.

    It’s very clear to me that Adidas made this deal a very strategic priority for them in the NW ... strong business done there
    TCU MBA analysis.
    Ageerd. Overpaying is always a great business strat.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BennyBeaver
    BennyBeaver Member Posts: 13,346
    USMChawk said:

    Swaye said:

    USMChawk said:

    Dennis_DeYoung said:

    USMChawk said:

    UWhuskytskeet said:

    USMChawk said:

    Bread said:

    Just dropped by my local middle school. Champion is the hot brand with the next generation. If we want to be a power house in the 2020s we better switch to Champion.

    This is true. I had a $7.00 Champion sweatshirt, from the early 90’s, that I wore when I was leaving the gym or doing yard work; it’s pretty ratty. My 16 year old daughter discovered it in an old gym bag and now wears it nonstop. It’s amazing how many compliments her friends give her.

    Pics.
    Sure.







    I’d fuck you...
    You don’t sound like my wife.

    YBFE
    Young Black Female Entrepreneur?
    aka "Ho."
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,098
    BennyBeaver said:

    BleachedAnusDawg said:

    Tequilla said:

    Tequilla said:

    I’ve always tended to like Adidas products a little better ... although Nike generally owns the basketball shoe market.

    Personally, I’d like to see us disassociate with Nike purely because of the Knight/Oregon relationship. Both Nike/Adidas are HQ’ed in Portland and I could see a deal with UW being a strategic priority for Adidas.

    Given that Nike didn’t make a realistic offer outside of re-upping at essentially the existing terms, Adidas COULD have gotten away with a slightly less attractive offer than what they made.

    It’s very clear to me that Adidas made this deal a very strategic priority for them in the NW ... strong business done there
    TCU MBA analysis.
    Ageerd. Overpaying is always a great business strat.
    I guarantee that there was a RFP sent to both Nike and Adidas

    I also guarantee that Adidas has a strong plan to monetize their investment in UW ... just like Nike’s bid was consistent with their plan to monetize

    Adidas is more than willing to spend more money to make more money ... and that’s not counting the strategic implications of the deal for both sides
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BennyBeaver
    BennyBeaver Member Posts: 13,346
    Gladstone said:

    RFPs for both nike and adidas huh

    hot take there teq

    UA got an RFP as well.

    Hot take.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • huskyhooligan
    huskyhooligan Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 5,930 Swaye's Wigwam
    Your mom likes a hot take.



    Boom! Went there!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 23,720 Founders Club
    Sources are saying that Nike is paying Fuck You $$$ for the rights to rep northwest Land Grant schools!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,098
    BennyBeaver said:

    Gladstone said:

    RFPs for both nike and adidas huh

    hot take there teq

    UA got an RFP as well.

    Hot take.
    They received ... didn’t give any back
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,045
    Tequilla said:

    BennyBeaver said:

    BleachedAnusDawg said:

    Tequilla said:

    Tequilla said:

    I’ve always tended to like Adidas products a little better ... although Nike generally owns the basketball shoe market.

    Personally, I’d like to see us disassociate with Nike purely because of the Knight/Oregon relationship. Both Nike/Adidas are HQ’ed in Portland and I could see a deal with UW being a strategic priority for Adidas.

    Given that Nike didn’t make a realistic offer outside of re-upping at essentially the existing terms, Adidas COULD have gotten away with a slightly less attractive offer than what they made.

    It’s very clear to me that Adidas made this deal a very strategic priority for them in the NW ... strong business done there
    TCU MBA analysis.
    Ageerd. Overpaying is always a great business strat.
    I guarantee that there was a RFP sent to both Nike and Adidas

    I also guarantee that Adidas has a strong plan to monetize their investment in UW ... just like Nike’s bid was consistent with their plan to monetize

    Adidas is more than willing to spend more money to make more money ... and that’s not counting the strategic implications of the deal for both sides
    There's a lot of wet water in this poast.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,098
    creepycoug said:

    Tequilla said:

    BennyBeaver said:

    BleachedAnusDawg said:

    Tequilla said:

    Tequilla said:

    I’ve always tended to like Adidas products a little better ... although Nike generally owns the basketball shoe market.

    Personally, I’d like to see us disassociate with Nike purely because of the Knight/Oregon relationship. Both Nike/Adidas are HQ’ed in Portland and I could see a deal with UW being a strategic priority for Adidas.

    Given that Nike didn’t make a realistic offer outside of re-upping at essentially the existing terms, Adidas COULD have gotten away with a slightly less attractive offer than what they made.

    It’s very clear to me that Adidas made this deal a very strategic priority for them in the NW ... strong business done there
    TCU MBA analysis.
    Ageerd. Overpaying is always a great business strat.
    I guarantee that there was a RFP sent to both Nike and Adidas

    I also guarantee that Adidas has a strong plan to monetize their investment in UW ... just like Nike’s bid was consistent with their plan to monetize

    Adidas is more than willing to spend more money to make more money ... and that’s not counting the strategic implications of the deal for both sides
    There's a lot of wet water in this poast.
    Given the usual stupidity by many on this board, you never know
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,913
    Tequilla said:

    BennyBeaver said:

    BleachedAnusDawg said:

    Tequilla said:

    Tequilla said:

    I’ve always tended to like Adidas products a little better ... although Nike generally owns the basketball shoe market.

    Personally, I’d like to see us disassociate with Nike purely because of the Knight/Oregon relationship. Both Nike/Adidas are HQ’ed in Portland and I could see a deal with UW being a strategic priority for Adidas.

    Given that Nike didn’t make a realistic offer outside of re-upping at essentially the existing terms, Adidas COULD have gotten away with a slightly less attractive offer than what they made.

    It’s very clear to me that Adidas made this deal a very strategic priority for them in the NW ... strong business done there
    TCU MBA analysis.
    Ageerd. Overpaying is always a great business strat.
    I guarantee that there was a RFP sent to both Nike and Adidas

    I also guarantee that Adidas has a strong plan to monetize their investment in UW ... just like Nike’s bid was consistent with their plan to monetize

    Adidas is more than willing to spend more money to make more money ... and that’s not counting the strategic implications of the deal for both sides
    Since Adidas has dropped some payroll in the Bball thingy.... sure. They have some loose change to swing to you Mutts.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • FireCohen
    FireCohen Member Posts: 21,823
    HIV is strong in this thread
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter