Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Dante Pettis is HUNG

jhfstyle24
jhfstyle24 Member Posts: 3,255
in Hardcore Husky Board
out to dry by Brownsocks
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Comments

  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 24,285 Founders Club
    Let’s be honest, he left a lot to be desired as a pure #1 receiver. Great player overall, though. We just needed Bryant or someone to be the #1.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • puppylove_sugarsteel
    puppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
    edited March 2018
    haie said:

    Let’s be honest, he left a lot to be desired as a pure #1 receiver. Great player overall, though. We just needed Bryant or someone to be the #1.

    If Bryant is your #1 we in trouble...need a burner who can stretch field and attack ball in air. I like Bynum...not a burner, but a true WR. I think he makes a move.

    Bryant is a big WR basically, but hardly a #1. Need 2-3 WR's to help browning. We saw how shitty we were with Pennis out ( and Bryant at TE)
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleBaze
    PurpleBaze Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,456 Founders Club
    haie said:

    Let’s be honest, he left a lot to be desired as a pure #1 receiver. Great player overall, though. We just needed Bryant or someone to be the #1.

    *Quite honestly
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 24,285 Founders Club
    puppylove_sugarsteel said:

    haie said:

    Let’s be honest, he left a lot to be desired as a pure #1 receiver. Great player overall, though. We just needed Bryant or someone to be the #1.

    If Bryant is your #1 we in trouble...need a burner who can stretch field and attack ball in air. I like Bynum...not a burner, but a true WR. I think he makes a move.

    Bryant is a big WR basically, but hardly a #1. Need 2-3 WR's to help browning. We saw how shitty we were with Pennis out ( and Bryant at TE)
    He was pretty much our #1 against Cal before he got hurt.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • puppylove_sugarsteel
    puppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
    haie said:

    Let’s be honest, he left a lot to be desired as a pure #1 receiver. Great player overall, though. We just needed Bryant or someone to be the #1.

    Who are you talking about? Bryant?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • puppylove_sugarsteel
    puppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
    edited March 2018
    haie said:

    puppylove_sugarsteel said:

    haie said:

    Let’s be honest, he left a lot to be desired as a pure #1 receiver. Great player overall, though. We just needed Bryant or someone to be the #1.

    If Bryant is your #1 we in trouble...need a burner who can stretch field and attack ball in air. I like Bynum...not a burner, but a true WR. I think he makes a move.

    Bryant is a big WR basically, but hardly a #1. Need 2-3 WR's to help browning. We saw how shitty we were with Pennis out ( and Bryant at TE)
    He was pretty much our #1 against Cal before he got hurt.
    And that's a huge problem. Can't win the pac12 with a TE as a #1 receiver. Need at least 1WR, hopefully 2 with more catches than Bryant.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TTJ
    TTJ Member Posts: 4,827
    haie said:

    Let’s be honest, he left a lot to be desired as a pure #1 receiver. Great player overall, though. We just needed Bryant or someone to be the #1.

    I didn’t see that at all. Pettis was terrific, when someone could get the ball to him.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • jhfstyle24
    jhfstyle24 Member Posts: 3,255
    edited March 2018
    haie said:

    Let’s be honest, he left a lot to be desired as a pure #1 receiver. Great player overall, though. We just needed Bryant or someone to be the #1.

    a) He was fantastic
    b) Jake Browning was his QB
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • whatshouldicareabout
    whatshouldicareabout Member Posts: 13,000
    puppylove_sugarsteel said:

    haie said:

    puppylove_sugarsteel said:

    haie said:

    Let’s be honest, he left a lot to be desired as a pure #1 receiver. Great player overall, though. We just needed Bryant or someone to be the #1.

    If Bryant is your #1 we in trouble...need a burner who can stretch field and attack ball in air. I like Bynum...not a burner, but a true WR. I think he makes a move.

    Bryant is a big WR basically, but hardly a #1. Need 2-3 WR's to help browning. We saw how shitty we were with Pennis out ( and Bryant at TE)
    He was pretty much our #1 against Cal before he got hurt.
    And that's a huge problem. Can't win the pac12 with a TE as a #1 receiver. Need at least 1WR, hopefully 2 with more catches than Bryant.
    Stanford has probably done that 2 or 3 times in the last decade. I know for sure when Ertz was there in 2013.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • FireCohen
    FireCohen Member Posts: 21,823
    edited March 2018
    Dennis_DeYoung said:

    Jake Browning is fucking terrible.

    So you saying that water is wet. Thanks for the update
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • huskyhooligan
    huskyhooligan Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 5,991 Swaye's Wigwam
    More Wildcat and handing the ball off. I bet McGrew has a better arm.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CFetters_Nacho_Lover
    CFetters_Nacho_Lover Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 32,581 Founders Club
    Dennis_DeYoung said:

    Jake Browning is fucking terrible.

    All that being said, Jake Browning sucks.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Ice_Holmvik
    Ice_Holmvik Member Posts: 2,912
    PurpleBaze said:

    haie said:

    Let’s be honest, he left a lot to be desired as a pure #1 receiver. Great player overall, though. We just needed Bryant or someone to be the #1.

    *Quite honestly
    I honestly don't disagree.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • puppylove_sugarsteel
    puppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
    edited March 2018
    whlinder said:

    We beat Miami, won the Rose Bowl and popped off with significantly worse WRs than Dante Pettis.

    We had Justin Robbins, pat Reddick and a 6-3 whitey todd elstrom . Was a better receiving corps than last year by far. Get facts straight linder. You have no clue who Justin Robbins is do you. I bet 90% of you bonio's here do...hint, played with Jerramy Stevens in high school...

    Edit: would have been Mario Bailey good had he not got hurt washed out as a freshman
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,850
    puppylove_sugarsteel said:

    whlinder said:

    We beat Miami, won the Rose Bowl and popped off with significantly worse WRs than Dante Pettis.

    We had Justin Robbins, pat Reddick and a 6-3 whitey todd elstrom . Was a better receiving corps than last year by far. Get facts straight linder. You have no clue who Justin Robbins is do you. I bet 90% of you bonio's here do...hint, played with Jerramy Stevens in high school...

    Edit: would have been Mario Bailey good had he not got hurt washed out as a freshman
    2000s receiving corps might have been better if you count Stevens. No single WR on that team was half as good as Pettis.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • whlinder
    whlinder Member Posts: 5,348
    puppylove_sugarsteel said:

    whlinder said:

    We beat Miami, won the Rose Bowl and popped off with significantly worse WRs than Dante Pettis.

    We had Justin Robbins, pat Reddick and a 6-3 whitey todd elstrom . Was a better receiving corps than last year by far. Get facts straight linder. You have no clue who Justin Robbins is do you. I bet 90% of you bonio's here do...hint, played with Jerramy Stevens in high school...

    Edit: would have been Mario Bailey good had he not got hurt washed out as a freshman
    I went to every home game that year. Pettis better than all of them. Elstrom was ok, a nice possession WR, brought his lunch pail and hard hat to practice every day, the kind of guy you’d want your daughter to date, but not as physically talented.
    Robbins was fine but not Dante Pettis. Come on son.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • FireCohen
    FireCohen Member Posts: 21,823
    Dante probably going to be a 10year pro, never a super star but an amazing #2 or #3
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,184
    whlinder said:

    We beat Miami, won the Rose Bowl and popped off with significantly worse WRs than Dante Pettis.

    Tui
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,184
    puppylove_sugarsteel said:

    whlinder said:

    We beat Miami, won the Rose Bowl and popped off with significantly worse WRs than Dante Pettis.

    We had Justin Robbins, pat Reddick and a 6-3 whitey todd elstrom . Was a better receiving corps than last year by far. Get facts straight linder. You have no clue who Justin Robbins is do you. I bet 90% of you bonio's here do...hint, played with Jerramy Stevens in high school...

    Edit: would have been Mario Bailey good had he not got hurt washed out as a freshman
    You are high.

    Again.

    He's right. The 2000 team had good, but not great, WRs, and nobody better than Pettis. You had a fucking MAN for a tight end, and an all-timer at QB who just did something whenever somebody needed to just do something.

    The reason nobody remembers Robbins or Elstrom or Reddick is because they were perfectly forgettable. Everyone remembers Tui and Stevens.

    Shut up and go back to bed you sack sucker.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • puppylove_sugarsteel
    puppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
    edited March 2018
    Would
    dnc said:

    puppylove_sugarsteel said:

    whlinder said:

    We beat Miami, won the Rose Bowl and popped off with significantly worse WRs than Dante Pettis.

    We had Justin Robbins, pat Reddick and a 6-3 whitey todd elstrom . Was a better receiving corps than last year by far. Get facts straight linder. You have no clue who Justin Robbins is do you. I bet 90% of you bonio's here do...hint, played with Jerramy Stevens in high school...

    Edit: would have been Mario Bailey good had he not got hurt washed out as a freshman
    2000s receiving corps might have been better if you count Stevens. No single WR on that team was half as good as Pettis.
    We werent talking about just pettis you ignorant sluts. Fuck, stay the course ...WE WERE TALKING WR GROUP... most of you dingus bitches slammed pettis his 1st 2 years here. Puppy liked his game as a freshman. But i liked Robbins as a freshman too...and because most of you were chewing on mama's teat then...Robbins caught a rose-bowl TD...his last game if i remember correctly. Pettis was on sideline with a tweaked twat for fiesta bowl and last game.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter