Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Sark is bringing his hurry up bullshit offense to USC?
Comments
-
Wonder how the Trojans will like their crisp, white unis?
After all, you can't expect Sark to able to recruit in that shit they wore in the 1970's.
Plus, who doesn't like the BYU look?
-
Send him homeSpoonieLuv said:Does Max Browne have to transfer to BYU first or can he just go straight to Kansas?
-
Sorry. Impossible. We didn't want him, remember?dnc said:
Send him homeSpoonieLuv said:Does Max Browne have to transfer to BYU first or can he just go straight to Kansas?
-
I know Sark won't do very well at USC, but I think he could be a Kiffin like disaster. He will probably be an 8-4, 9-3 type coach there, but I can also see it being a disaster from the start. If he has his typical plungers on the road, like More Time said, there is no 0-12 to use, and the LA media is entirely different than the Seattle media. Not to mention the USC fan base is not even close to as pathetic and doogy as UW's. It will be no different than Sark at UW. USC will destroy the weak teams and get beat by the good teams. USC is fucked.
-
If Sark doesn't win the South in the first two years he will be on the hot seat the third year. UCLA is going to win next year and maybe the year after.
-
I thought it was a great offense for one game. and then it never seemed to run as fast.
-
Bad coaching is bad coaching. Can't hide no matter how good the talent is. 8-4 in 2015 with losses to UW, Oregon, AZ and UCLA will get him fired. Book it.
-
Sark will have a worse Oline at SC than he had here. He's going to have a very difficult time running the football.
-
Sark was able to run the ball at UW. Polk and Sankey shown that, and with crap for a line. USC is know for being a running back school (at least in the past…Heisman Winners). I think Sark has good potential to bring that back to USC.
-
The only problem is he never stuck with the run. He always chose really weird times to throw the other team off and it was usually a pretty shitty play call. Pretty much if Sankey on 1st down got a gain of 1 or 2 yards I knew the drive was fucked.alumni94 said:Sark was able to run the ball at UW. Polk and Sankey shown that, and with crap for a line. USC is know for being a running back school (at least in the past…Heisman Winners). I think Sark has good potential to bring that back to USC.








