2019 Recruiting Bored (Updated 9/27/18)

RaceBannon said:

AIRWOLF said:

AIRWOLF said:

WeakarmCobra said:

AIRWOLF said:

I have created a table in Tableau with all known offers outstanding, per Rivals and 24/7. I grouped them by projected position for the Huskies, based on common sense. I included the three verbal commitments as well. There was one QB/Athlete that I removed from the list since he seems intent on playing QB and UW is done at that position.





2019 Offers and Verbals by Projected Position (Sorted by 247 Composite Grade

How much free time do you have on hand?

A significant amount. It is good to be comfortably retired.

This is bullshit, by the way. I am currently unemployed between jobs and am literally in my basement.

Should have read farther or even further

AIRWOLF said:

GrundleStiltzkin said:

AIRWOLF said:

I have created a table in Tableau with all known offers outstanding, per Rivals and 24/7. I grouped them by projected position for the Huskies, based on common sense. I included the three verbal commitments as well. There was one QB/Athlete that I removed from the list since he seems intent on playing QB and UW is done at that position.





2019 Offers and Verbals by Projected Position (Sorted by 247 Composite Grade

Pete really does hate WA

It almost certainly has to do with evaluation timetables. And UW does have to get in the game earlier with out of state kids, particularly those outside of California and the PNW.

But one does see how it could create the perception of a bias against locals.

The other thing that I find amusing is the fact Petersen likes to make those snarky comments about recruiting star rankings being garbage, yet at least 42 of his 56 early offers are guys that carry 4- or 5-star early rankings. And most of the remainder are high 3-stars.

dnc said:

AIRWOLF said:

GrundleStiltzkin said:

AIRWOLF said:

I have created a table in Tableau with all known offers outstanding, per Rivals and 24/7. I grouped them by projected position for the Huskies, based on common sense. I included the three verbal commitments as well. There was one QB/Athlete that I removed from the list since he seems intent on playing QB and UW is done at that position.





2019 Offers and Verbals by Projected Position (Sorted by 247 Composite Grade

Pete really does hate WA

It almost certainly has to do with evaluation timetables. And UW does have to get in the game earlier with out of state kids, particularly those outside of California and the PNW.

But one does see how it could create the perception of a bias against locals.

The other thing that I find amusing is the fact Petersen likes to make those snarky comments about recruiting star rankings being garbage, yet at least 42 of his 56 early offers are guys that carry 4- or 5-star early rankings. And most of the remainder are high 3-stars.

Who will be this year's Dominique Hampton, low 3 star with high 4 star talent?

Dennis_DeYoung said:

AIRWOLF said:

GrundleStiltzkin said:

AIRWOLF said:

I have created a table in Tableau with all known offers outstanding, per Rivals and 24/7. I grouped them by projected position for the Huskies, based on common sense. I included the three verbal commitments as well. There was one QB/Athlete that I removed from the list since he seems intent on playing QB and UW is done at that position.





2019 Offers and Verbals by Projected Position (Sorted by 247 Composite Grade

Pete really does hate WA

It almost certainly has to do with evaluation timetables. And UW does have to get in the game earlier with out of state kids, particularly those outside of California and the PNW.

But one does see how it could create the perception of a bias against locals.

The other thing that I find amusing is the fact Petersen likes to make those snarky comments about recruiting star rankings being garbage, yet at least 42 of his 56 early offers are guys that carry 4- or 5-star early rankings. And most of the remainder are high 3-stars.

Pete is full of shit on recruiting rankings. He had to be at Boise state and when you form an attitude that hard and publicly mock the obvious truth, it's hard to turn that shit around even when it is clear that you are wrong. You won't have to crane your neck in our society to see examples of this everywhere.

If every college coach could have their first choice there would only be like 100 players selected total.

There's a difference between there being a strong correlation between rankings and performance and a PERFECT correlation and Pete is as guilty as anyone at trying to poison our society with the notion than a non-perfect correlation is basically the same thing as no correlation.

When "my friend" was banging Carol Shaeffer and her 38DDD boobs after school in 9th grade, it seemed a compelling argument that this was the optimal choice and boob size was the only TRUE important criteria upon which conquests could or should be measured.

Until small-boobed (but way hotter) Bridget Perry gave a wink, then everyone was fucking falling all over themselves to learn the words to Bon Jovi songs and buy her pizza pockets.

FLAG ME FUCK YOU.