Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Horrific situation in Venezuela
Comments
-
Couldn't find that huh? There's your socialism.2001400ex said:
What adminstration created the program that took over GM? And who owns GM currently????Sledog said:
It is socialism they just haven't seized all the means of production yet. They did grab GM though. Maybe you can point out where in the constitution the government has authority to seize a private company and appoint it's own CEO with taxpayer dollars?2001400ex said:
No that's not socialism. Dumbass. Socialism has to do with ownership of production of goods and services.Sledog said:
It is to an extent but they are paying in and are supposed to be paid back based on how much went in. For the working people it's was supposed to be a retirement system. For the lazy asses getting paid and not having paid in it's socialism. HTH2001400ex said:
You are the one who screams socialism and communism when those programs are discussed.Sledog said:
Why do you think something that someone paid for out of their paycheck by force for programs such as social security and Medicare are socialism. I don't agree with these programs. They give benefits to people that never paid in to the systems and the government has "borrowed" billions from them. I'll bet you can't guess which party....2001400ex said:
And 60 years at social security, food stamps and everything, that's exactly what our hospitals and grocery stores look like.Sledog said:Yeah socialism.
Food stamps, welfare, WIC, section 8 etc. were meant to be a safety net that have turned into 8 generations of lazy people sucking off the government teat and the sweat off the brow of their fellow Americans.
Dumbass. You truly don't even know what socialism or communism are. If you did you'd know that America is no where near socialism or communism.
We can agree that there are too many lazy people living off the government. That being said, it's still not socialism. And Paul Ryan just said yesterday that entitlements, mostly social security and Medicare, are the cause of the increased deficit. His words, not mine.
Sucking on the teat that long is socialism. -
The government owned a controlling interest in GM for a short period of time. And wouldn't exist today if that didn't happen. Would you rather that production go to Toyota?Sledog said:
Couldn't find that huh? There's your socialism.2001400ex said:
What adminstration created the program that took over GM? And who owns GM currently????Sledog said:
It is socialism they just haven't seized all the means of production yet. They did grab GM though. Maybe you can point out where in the constitution the government has authority to seize a private company and appoint it's own CEO with taxpayer dollars?2001400ex said:
No that's not socialism. Dumbass. Socialism has to do with ownership of production of goods and services.Sledog said:
It is to an extent but they are paying in and are supposed to be paid back based on how much went in. For the working people it's was supposed to be a retirement system. For the lazy asses getting paid and not having paid in it's socialism. HTH2001400ex said:
You are the one who screams socialism and communism when those programs are discussed.Sledog said:
Why do you think something that someone paid for out of their paycheck by force for programs such as social security and Medicare are socialism. I don't agree with these programs. They give benefits to people that never paid in to the systems and the government has "borrowed" billions from them. I'll bet you can't guess which party....2001400ex said:
And 60 years at social security, food stamps and everything, that's exactly what our hospitals and grocery stores look like.Sledog said:Yeah socialism.
Food stamps, welfare, WIC, section 8 etc. were meant to be a safety net that have turned into 8 generations of lazy people sucking off the government teat and the sweat off the brow of their fellow Americans.
Dumbass. You truly don't even know what socialism or communism are. If you did you'd know that America is no where near socialism or communism.
We can agree that there are too many lazy people living off the government. That being said, it's still not socialism. And Paul Ryan just said yesterday that entitlements, mostly social security and Medicare, are the cause of the increased deficit. His words, not mine.
Sucking on the teat that long is socialism. -
Illegal seizure of a private company by a self admitted commie/socialist. Thanks for playing.2001400ex said:
The government owned a controlling interest in GM for a short period of time. And wouldn't exist today if that didn't happen. Would you rather that production go to Toyota?Sledog said:
Couldn't find that huh? There's your socialism.2001400ex said:
What adminstration created the program that took over GM? And who owns GM currently????Sledog said:
It is socialism they just haven't seized all the means of production yet. They did grab GM though. Maybe you can point out where in the constitution the government has authority to seize a private company and appoint it's own CEO with taxpayer dollars?2001400ex said:
No that's not socialism. Dumbass. Socialism has to do with ownership of production of goods and services.Sledog said:
It is to an extent but they are paying in and are supposed to be paid back based on how much went in. For the working people it's was supposed to be a retirement system. For the lazy asses getting paid and not having paid in it's socialism. HTH2001400ex said:
You are the one who screams socialism and communism when those programs are discussed.Sledog said:
Why do you think something that someone paid for out of their paycheck by force for programs such as social security and Medicare are socialism. I don't agree with these programs. They give benefits to people that never paid in to the systems and the government has "borrowed" billions from them. I'll bet you can't guess which party....2001400ex said:
And 60 years at social security, food stamps and everything, that's exactly what our hospitals and grocery stores look like.Sledog said:Yeah socialism.
Food stamps, welfare, WIC, section 8 etc. were meant to be a safety net that have turned into 8 generations of lazy people sucking off the government teat and the sweat off the brow of their fellow Americans.
Dumbass. You truly don't even know what socialism or communism are. If you did you'd know that America is no where near socialism or communism.
We can agree that there are too many lazy people living off the government. That being said, it's still not socialism. And Paul Ryan just said yesterday that entitlements, mostly social security and Medicare, are the cause of the increased deficit. His words, not mine.
Sucking on the teat that long is socialism. -
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troubled_Asset_Relief_ProgramSledog said:
Illegal seizure of a private company by a self admitted commie/socialist. Thanks for playing.2001400ex said:
The government owned a controlling interest in GM for a short period of time. And wouldn't exist today if that didn't happen. Would you rather that production go to Toyota?Sledog said:
Couldn't find that huh? There's your socialism.2001400ex said:
What adminstration created the program that took over GM? And who owns GM currently????Sledog said:
It is socialism they just haven't seized all the means of production yet. They did grab GM though. Maybe you can point out where in the constitution the government has authority to seize a private company and appoint it's own CEO with taxpayer dollars?2001400ex said:
No that's not socialism. Dumbass. Socialism has to do with ownership of production of goods and services.Sledog said:
It is to an extent but they are paying in and are supposed to be paid back based on how much went in. For the working people it's was supposed to be a retirement system. For the lazy asses getting paid and not having paid in it's socialism. HTH2001400ex said:
You are the one who screams socialism and communism when those programs are discussed.Sledog said:
Why do you think something that someone paid for out of their paycheck by force for programs such as social security and Medicare are socialism. I don't agree with these programs. They give benefits to people that never paid in to the systems and the government has "borrowed" billions from them. I'll bet you can't guess which party....2001400ex said:
And 60 years at social security, food stamps and everything, that's exactly what our hospitals and grocery stores look like.Sledog said:Yeah socialism.
Food stamps, welfare, WIC, section 8 etc. were meant to be a safety net that have turned into 8 generations of lazy people sucking off the government teat and the sweat off the brow of their fellow Americans.
Dumbass. You truly don't even know what socialism or communism are. If you did you'd know that America is no where near socialism or communism.
We can agree that there are too many lazy people living off the government. That being said, it's still not socialism. And Paul Ryan just said yesterday that entitlements, mostly social security and Medicare, are the cause of the increased deficit. His words, not mine.
Sucking on the teat that long is socialism. -
Banks.2001400ex said:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troubled_Asset_Relief_ProgramSledog said:
Illegal seizure of a private company by a self admitted commie/socialist. Thanks for playing.2001400ex said:
The government owned a controlling interest in GM for a short period of time. And wouldn't exist today if that didn't happen. Would you rather that production go to Toyota?Sledog said:
Couldn't find that huh? There's your socialism.2001400ex said:
What adminstration created the program that took over GM? And who owns GM currently????Sledog said:
It is socialism they just haven't seized all the means of production yet. They did grab GM though. Maybe you can point out where in the constitution the government has authority to seize a private company and appoint it's own CEO with taxpayer dollars?2001400ex said:
No that's not socialism. Dumbass. Socialism has to do with ownership of production of goods and services.Sledog said:
It is to an extent but they are paying in and are supposed to be paid back based on how much went in. For the working people it's was supposed to be a retirement system. For the lazy asses getting paid and not having paid in it's socialism. HTH2001400ex said:
You are the one who screams socialism and communism when those programs are discussed.Sledog said:
Why do you think something that someone paid for out of their paycheck by force for programs such as social security and Medicare are socialism. I don't agree with these programs. They give benefits to people that never paid in to the systems and the government has "borrowed" billions from them. I'll bet you can't guess which party....2001400ex said:
And 60 years at social security, food stamps and everything, that's exactly what our hospitals and grocery stores look like.Sledog said:Yeah socialism.
Food stamps, welfare, WIC, section 8 etc. were meant to be a safety net that have turned into 8 generations of lazy people sucking off the government teat and the sweat off the brow of their fellow Americans.
Dumbass. You truly don't even know what socialism or communism are. If you did you'd know that America is no where near socialism or communism.
We can agree that there are too many lazy people living off the government. That being said, it's still not socialism. And Paul Ryan just said yesterday that entitlements, mostly social security and Medicare, are the cause of the increased deficit. His words, not mine.
Sucking on the teat that long is socialism. -
There is so much stupid in this comment its HondoFS worthy...because every company that goes bankrupt just magically disappears or something...2001400ex said:
The government owned a controlling interest in GM for a short period of time. And wouldn't exist today if that didn't happen. Would you rather that production go to Toyota?Sledog said:
Couldn't find that huh? There's your socialism.2001400ex said:
What adminstration created the program that took over GM? And who owns GM currently????Sledog said:
It is socialism they just haven't seized all the means of production yet. They did grab GM though. Maybe you can point out where in the constitution the government has authority to seize a private company and appoint it's own CEO with taxpayer dollars?2001400ex said:
No that's not socialism. Dumbass. Socialism has to do with ownership of production of goods and services.Sledog said:
It is to an extent but they are paying in and are supposed to be paid back based on how much went in. For the working people it's was supposed to be a retirement system. For the lazy asses getting paid and not having paid in it's socialism. HTH2001400ex said:
You are the one who screams socialism and communism when those programs are discussed.Sledog said:
Why do you think something that someone paid for out of their paycheck by force for programs such as social security and Medicare are socialism. I don't agree with these programs. They give benefits to people that never paid in to the systems and the government has "borrowed" billions from them. I'll bet you can't guess which party....2001400ex said:
And 60 years at social security, food stamps and everything, that's exactly what our hospitals and grocery stores look like.Sledog said:Yeah socialism.
Food stamps, welfare, WIC, section 8 etc. were meant to be a safety net that have turned into 8 generations of lazy people sucking off the government teat and the sweat off the brow of their fellow Americans.
Dumbass. You truly don't even know what socialism or communism are. If you did you'd know that America is no where near socialism or communism.
We can agree that there are too many lazy people living off the government. That being said, it's still not socialism. And Paul Ryan just said yesterday that entitlements, mostly social security and Medicare, are the cause of the increased deficit. His words, not mine.
Sucking on the teat that long is socialism. -
It would have hurt the 90% work force that earned full pray for not going to work. UAW got the company and investors got the shaft. UAW donated large to the BHO.HoustonHusky said:
There is so much stupid in this comment its HondoFS worthy...because every company that goes bankrupt just magically disappears or something...2001400ex said:
The government owned a controlling interest in GM for a short period of time. And wouldn't exist today if that didn't happen. Would you rather that production go to Toyota?Sledog said:
Couldn't find that huh? There's your socialism.2001400ex said:
What adminstration created the program that took over GM? And who owns GM currently????Sledog said:
It is socialism they just haven't seized all the means of production yet. They did grab GM though. Maybe you can point out where in the constitution the government has authority to seize a private company and appoint it's own CEO with taxpayer dollars?2001400ex said:
No that's not socialism. Dumbass. Socialism has to do with ownership of production of goods and services.Sledog said:
It is to an extent but they are paying in and are supposed to be paid back based on how much went in. For the working people it's was supposed to be a retirement system. For the lazy asses getting paid and not having paid in it's socialism. HTH2001400ex said:
You are the one who screams socialism and communism when those programs are discussed.Sledog said:
Why do you think something that someone paid for out of their paycheck by force for programs such as social security and Medicare are socialism. I don't agree with these programs. They give benefits to people that never paid in to the systems and the government has "borrowed" billions from them. I'll bet you can't guess which party....2001400ex said:
And 60 years at social security, food stamps and everything, that's exactly what our hospitals and grocery stores look like.Sledog said:Yeah socialism.
Food stamps, welfare, WIC, section 8 etc. were meant to be a safety net that have turned into 8 generations of lazy people sucking off the government teat and the sweat off the brow of their fellow Americans.
Dumbass. You truly don't even know what socialism or communism are. If you did you'd know that America is no where near socialism or communism.
We can agree that there are too many lazy people living off the government. That being said, it's still not socialism. And Paul Ryan just said yesterday that entitlements, mostly social security and Medicare, are the cause of the increased deficit. His words, not mine.
Sucking on the teat that long is socialism. -
Care to show me the bank that was willing to lend GM the money to make it through bankruptcy?HoustonHusky said:
There is so much stupid in this comment its HondoFS worthy...because every company that goes bankrupt just magically disappears or something...2001400ex said:
The government owned a controlling interest in GM for a short period of time. And wouldn't exist today if that didn't happen. Would you rather that production go to Toyota?Sledog said:
Couldn't find that huh? There's your socialism.2001400ex said:
What adminstration created the program that took over GM? And who owns GM currently????Sledog said:
It is socialism they just haven't seized all the means of production yet. They did grab GM though. Maybe you can point out where in the constitution the government has authority to seize a private company and appoint it's own CEO with taxpayer dollars?2001400ex said:
No that's not socialism. Dumbass. Socialism has to do with ownership of production of goods and services.Sledog said:
It is to an extent but they are paying in and are supposed to be paid back based on how much went in. For the working people it's was supposed to be a retirement system. For the lazy asses getting paid and not having paid in it's socialism. HTH2001400ex said:
You are the one who screams socialism and communism when those programs are discussed.Sledog said:
Why do you think something that someone paid for out of their paycheck by force for programs such as social security and Medicare are socialism. I don't agree with these programs. They give benefits to people that never paid in to the systems and the government has "borrowed" billions from them. I'll bet you can't guess which party....2001400ex said:
And 60 years at social security, food stamps and everything, that's exactly what our hospitals and grocery stores look like.Sledog said:Yeah socialism.
Food stamps, welfare, WIC, section 8 etc. were meant to be a safety net that have turned into 8 generations of lazy people sucking off the government teat and the sweat off the brow of their fellow Americans.
Dumbass. You truly don't even know what socialism or communism are. If you did you'd know that America is no where near socialism or communism.
We can agree that there are too many lazy people living off the government. That being said, it's still not socialism. And Paul Ryan just said yesterday that entitlements, mostly social security and Medicare, are the cause of the increased deficit. His words, not mine.
Sucking on the teat that long is socialism. -
That GM takeover was one of the most successful business moves of the entire recession and resulted in GM being an industry leader again.Sledog said:
It is socialism they just haven't seized all the means of production yet. They did grab GM though. Maybe you can point out where in the constitution the government has authority to seize a private company and appoint it's own CEO with taxpayer dollars?2001400ex said:
No that's not socialism. Dumbass. Socialism has to do with ownership of production of goods and services.Sledog said:
It is to an extent but they are paying in and are supposed to be paid back based on how much went in. For the working people it's was supposed to be a retirement system. For the lazy asses getting paid and not having paid in it's socialism. HTH2001400ex said:
You are the one who screams socialism and communism when those programs are discussed.Sledog said:
Why do you think something that someone paid for out of their paycheck by force for programs such as social security and Medicare are socialism. I don't agree with these programs. They give benefits to people that never paid in to the systems and the government has "borrowed" billions from them. I'll bet you can't guess which party....2001400ex said:
And 60 years at social security, food stamps and everything, that's exactly what our hospitals and grocery stores look like.Sledog said:Yeah socialism.
Food stamps, welfare, WIC, section 8 etc. were meant to be a safety net that have turned into 8 generations of lazy people sucking off the government teat and the sweat off the brow of their fellow Americans.
Dumbass. You truly don't even know what socialism or communism are. If you did you'd know that America is no where near socialism or communism.
We can agree that there are too many lazy people living off the government. That being said, it's still not socialism. And Paul Ryan just said yesterday that entitlements, mostly social security and Medicare, are the cause of the increased deficit. His words, not mine.
Sucking on the teat that long is socialism.
Out of the zillion government fuckups don't use one of their best moments. -
I can't find how BHO could legally do this. GM would have survived, the union would not have been in great shape. That's why BHO did the takeover it wasn't about GM it was about UAW.Mosster47 said:
That GM takeover was one of the most successful business moves of the entire recession and resulted in GM being an industry leader again.Sledog said:
It is socialism they just haven't seized all the means of production yet. They did grab GM though. Maybe you can point out where in the constitution the government has authority to seize a private company and appoint it's own CEO with taxpayer dollars?2001400ex said:
No that's not socialism. Dumbass. Socialism has to do with ownership of production of goods and services.Sledog said:
It is to an extent but they are paying in and are supposed to be paid back based on how much went in. For the working people it's was supposed to be a retirement system. For the lazy asses getting paid and not having paid in it's socialism. HTH2001400ex said:
You are the one who screams socialism and communism when those programs are discussed.Sledog said:
Why do you think something that someone paid for out of their paycheck by force for programs such as social security and Medicare are socialism. I don't agree with these programs. They give benefits to people that never paid in to the systems and the government has "borrowed" billions from them. I'll bet you can't guess which party....2001400ex said:
And 60 years at social security, food stamps and everything, that's exactly what our hospitals and grocery stores look like.Sledog said:Yeah socialism.
Food stamps, welfare, WIC, section 8 etc. were meant to be a safety net that have turned into 8 generations of lazy people sucking off the government teat and the sweat off the brow of their fellow Americans.
Dumbass. You truly don't even know what socialism or communism are. If you did you'd know that America is no where near socialism or communism.
We can agree that there are too many lazy people living off the government. That being said, it's still not socialism. And Paul Ryan just said yesterday that entitlements, mostly social security and Medicare, are the cause of the increased deficit. His words, not mine.
Sucking on the teat that long is socialism.
Out of the zillion government fuckups don't use one of their best moments.
