Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

4th Annual Jesse Callier Post-Collegiate Impact Ranking Survey RESULTS (2018)

2»

Comments

  • Bread
    Bread Member Posts: 4,073
    Our kickoffs have been pretty fucking good.
  • Woof
    Woof Member Posts: 770

    Vita Vea 4.94 overall for a +1.94. @Woof, @BaldwinIV, @DeepDawg, and @bananasnblondes literally must have wanted him to literally kill a player on the field, literally.

    In my defense, I'm an idiot.

    I nearly gave Virta a 5, but I saved those for the guys who were all-conference/all-american for multiple years. I didn't think he was quite there in 2016, but he was about as close as you can get though. In hindsight I guess that means I should have given Coleman Shelton a 5, but I would refer you back to my first sentence.
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    doogie said:

    Not worried. Print, print, print is the decision. Has been since 2000. Pretending to care about the deficit now, is folly.

    Deficits don't matter until they do. We've never reached that point in our modern but to act like it can't happen is beyond FS. We only get to borrow on the cheap because the rest of the world still believes in the full faith and credit of the US Government. If that changes we fuct biggy.

    We have a fundamental problem in this country in that we want way more in benefits than we are willing to pay for them. And it's not just the fault of 'po people sucking off the guvmint tittays.
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter

    doogie said:

    Not worried. Print, print, print is the decision. Has been since 2000. Pretending to care about the deficit now, is folly.

    Deficits don't matter until they do. We've never reached that point in our modern but to act like it can't happen is beyond FS. We only get to borrow on the cheap because the rest of the world still believes in the full faith and credit of the US Government. If that changes we fuct biggy.

    We have a fundamental problem in this country in that we want way more in benefits than we are willing to pay for them. And it's not just the fault of 'po people sucking off the guvmint tittays.
    Huh?
    What?
  • CFetters_Nacho_Lover
    CFetters_Nacho_Lover Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 32,251 Founders Club

    doogie said:

    Not worried. Print, print, print is the decision. Has been since 2000. Pretending to care about the deficit now, is folly.

    Deficits don't matter until they do. We've never reached that point in our modern but to act like it can't happen is beyond FS. We only get to borrow on the cheap because the rest of the world still believes in the full faith and credit of the US Government. If that changes we fuct biggy.

    We have a fundamental problem in this country in that we want way more in benefits than we are willing to pay for them. And it's not just the fault of 'po people sucking off the guvmint tittays.
    Huh?
    What?
    GRUNDLE STOp
  • UW_Doog_Bot
    UW_Doog_Bot Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 18,053 Founders Club
    I don't even know why I gave Dissly a 2. FS.

    Anyways, I guess I understood this closer to DDY's system only with additional years to go higher than a 3 from on field contribution. I handed out a ton of 1's and 2's to people who maybe I would have put as a 2-4 seeing how the scoring went for others.
  • Dennis_DeYoung
    Dennis_DeYoung Member Posts: 14,754

    I don't even know why I gave Dissly a 2. FS.

    Anyways, I guess I understood this closer to DDY's system only with additional years to go higher than a 3 from on field contribution. I handed out a ton of 1's and 2's to people who maybe I would have put as a 2-4 seeing how the scoring went for others.

    1 - Did nothing, washed out.
    2 - Contributed, but never started consistently; or starter on a bad team.
    3 - Started consistently, never hit All Conference in any real way.
    4 - All Conference of some sort, multi-year starter.
    5 - All American.
  • Swaye
    Swaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,739 Founders Club

    I don't even know why I gave Dissly a 2. FS.

    Anyways, I guess I understood this closer to DDY's system only with additional years to go higher than a 3 from on field contribution. I handed out a ton of 1's and 2's to people who maybe I would have put as a 2-4 seeing how the scoring went for others.

    1 - Did nothing, washed out.
    2 - Contributed, but never started consistently; or starter on a bad team.
    3 - Started consistently, never hit All Conference in any real way.
    4 - All Conference of some sort, multi-year starter.
    5 - All American.
    Fully admit to being retarded and doing this wrong.
    Should have dug into my position and tried to justify it with a TLDR poast instead of just admitting to saying/doing something stupid. Wood have been better for the bored IMO.

    #FireJimmyLake
    I always just take the L when I say stupid shit, which is often. But you are correct, the bored prefers verbal fisticuffs.
  • FremontTroll
    FremontTroll Member Posts: 4,744

    I don't even know why I gave Dissly a 2. FS.

    Anyways, I guess I understood this closer to DDY's system only with additional years to go higher than a 3 from on field contribution. I handed out a ton of 1's and 2's to people who maybe I would have put as a 2-4 seeing how the scoring went for others.

    Wait, if you were scoring too low then how do you explain the 2s for Sterk and Lewis?
  • UW_Doog_Bot
    UW_Doog_Bot Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 18,053 Founders Club
    edited February 2018

    I don't even know why I gave Dissly a 2. FS.

    Anyways, I guess I understood this closer to DDY's system only with additional years to go higher than a 3 from on field contribution. I handed out a ton of 1's and 2's to people who maybe I would have put as a 2-4 seeing how the scoring went for others.

    Wait, if you were scoring too low then how do you explain the 2s for Sterk and Lewis?
    If I went back and redid my scores now I would bump a lot of people up but not them. You can very easily convince me to bump them down to 1's. If everyone else's scores were distributed more or less normally around 3 my scores would have been centered farther left with an average of 2 or less. I gave out scores which "clustered" a lot of people into a 2 who shouldn't have been there. I also didn't think about it too much and admitted to being retarded. *shrug