Chris Steele, 2019 4* DB, Bellflower (Bosco), CA (offered)
Comments
-
SmFJRhythmicSlappingDawg said:
So, he's basically Tabor from UF a few years ago? I'd still take him in a heartbeat.Dennis_DeYoung said:Pros: Can cover like a motherfucker.
Cons: Athletically not as impressive as a guy like Hampton or Gordon.
Chris Steele sounds like a C-rate 90s name for a spy. -
-
They don't exactly look thrilledRDR said: -
It's like hostage footageRhythmicSlappingDawg said: -
He honestly looks like he wants to quickly get as far away as possible from Eugene.dnc said:
It's like hostage footageRhythmicSlappingDawg said: -
White Mom? We got a shot with this kid!
-
Apparently he has dreams of Phil Fullmer and Steve Spurrier too.
-
Damnit Eric trust the process of his dreams!elord821 said: -
Do my eyes deceive me, or do I see FAU in there? I for sure see Oregon and the real USC, for those who don't believe in "flashy recruiting". If we could just fucking sell this program we might get some top recruits too, but of course we have to treat recruiting as some kind of vetting process...
-
Bashing UW recruiting is fine, bashing UW DB recruiting is FS.NorwegianHusky said:Do my eyes deceive me, or do I see FAU in there? I for sure see Oregon and the real USC, for those who don't believe in "flashy recruiting". If we could just fucking sell this program we might get some top recruits too, but of course we have to treat recruiting as some kind of vetting process...
-
Build that (sea)walldnc said:
Bashing UW recruiting is fine, bashing UW DB recruiting is FS.NorwegianHusky said:Do my eyes deceive me, or do I see FAU in there? I for sure see Oregon and the real USC, for those who don't believe in "flashy recruiting". If we could just fucking sell this program we might get some top recruits too, but of course we have to treat recruiting as some kind of vetting process...
-
Jesus fucking Christ, are we gonna have this shit for every kid in the country who doesn't pick uw? You seem to be pining for UW to adopt Oregon's recruiting philosophy. Are you even aware of how UW finished in recruiting last year compared to Oregon?NorwegianHusky said:Do my eyes deceive me, or do I see FAU in there? I for sure see Oregon and the real USC, for those who don't believe in "flashy recruiting". If we could just fucking sell this program we might get some top recruits too, but of course we have to treat recruiting as some kind of vetting process...
-
If it's generally true, it's generally true. Of course we're not going to get every kid we offer, but resonating less with a Cali recruit than mediocre east coast teams when we ostensibly have real interest is not a good thing.bananasnblondes said:
Jesus fucking Christ, are we gonna have this shit for every kid in the country who doesn't pick uw? You seem to be pining for UW to adopt Oregon's recruiting philosophy. Are you even aware of how UW finished in recruiting last year compared to Oregon?NorwegianHusky said:Do my eyes deceive me, or do I see FAU in there? I for sure see Oregon and the real USC, for those who don't believe in "flashy recruiting". If we could just fucking sell this program we might get some top recruits too, but of course we have to treat recruiting as some kind of vetting process...
Not saying we should adopt Oregon's strategy at all. Sending out 300 offers is idiotic. Not selling your program appropriately because you want to weed out weak links in the fucking selling phase is also idiotic.
These are not mutually exclusive view points. You guys are so fucking narrow-minded when it comes to this shit. You can't see the forest for the trees because you zoom in one fucking detail and ignore all the rest.
Not saying that I don't say stupid shit sometimes because I absolutely do, but 80% of the time someone disagrees with me here it's out of some idiotic false equivalency or false dilemma.
TWO THINGS THAT ARE VAGUELY RELATED CAN BOTH BE TRUE.
Fuck. -
in no ballz i trust. he had a monster db class last year, i expect the same this year. db recruiting is not an issue at uw as long as no ballz in charge
-
-
Mistake number one. Caring what people on here think. Mistake number two. Same as number one.NorwegianHusky said:
If it's generally true, it's generally true. Of course we're not going to get every kid we offer, but resonating less with a Cali recruit than mediocre east coast teams when we ostensibly have real interest is not a good thing.bananasnblondes said:
Jesus fucking Christ, are we gonna have this shit for every kid in the country who doesn't pick uw? You seem to be pining for UW to adopt Oregon's recruiting philosophy. Are you even aware of how UW finished in recruiting last year compared to Oregon?NorwegianHusky said:Do my eyes deceive me, or do I see FAU in there? I for sure see Oregon and the real USC, for those who don't believe in "flashy recruiting". If we could just fucking sell this program we might get some top recruits too, but of course we have to treat recruiting as some kind of vetting process...
Not saying we should adopt Oregon's strategy at all. Sending out 300 offers is idiotic. Not selling your program appropriately because you want to weed out weak links in the fucking selling phase is also idiotic.
These are not mutually exclusive view points. You guys are so fucking narrow-minded when it comes to this shit. You can't see the forest for the trees because you zoom in one fucking detail and ignore all the rest.
Not saying that I don't say stupid shit sometimes because I absolutely do, but 80% of the time someone disagrees with me here it's out of some idiotic false equivalency or false dilemma.
TWO THINGS THAT ARE VAGUELY RELATED CAN BOTH BE TRUE.
Fuck.
![[Deleted User]](https://wa.vanillicon.com/a33ddd61ac822b7b5e92667d0a5fabc1_100.png)
