Your 2018 Difficulty of Matchup Power Rankings
Comments
-
TheHB said:
I think we? will boat race Ucla next year.
Brian KellyBrian Kelly needs time to get his guys. -
Autistic approach
1 - @ Auburn - No brainer
2 - @ Utah - This guy steal Peterson's play book? Knows Brownsocks hates pressure.
3 - @ Oregon - I hear they have a good line, and decent QB.
4 - @ California - They actually played really well at home last season, lost some close gaymes.
5 - @ UCLA - How well does chip kelly do without Nick Aliotti?
6 - Stanford - probably my most autistic pick. I don't know, I just keep hoping they end up sucking.
7 - @ Washington State - I believe they will suck, but ultimately that is when they decide to show up for the Apple Cup. That being said, new DC, new QB (too soon?), new receivers, inability to run the ball, I still doog out on our chances.
8 - Colorado - really I just think they will take a step forward.
9 - Arizona State - Can't imagine them getting better.
10 - Oregon State - 85 pass plays to 4 runs.
11- BYU - BYU was horrible last season and I can't see them getting much better. BYU is the example for @Dennis_DeYoung of a roster filled with a bunch of white try hards.
12- North Dakota - Who?
-
BYU is the ultimate of SLOW STRATEGY programs.huskyhooligan said:Autistic approach
1 - @ Auburn - No brainer
2 - @ Utah - This guy steal Peterson's play book? Knows Brownsocks hates pressure.
3 - @ Oregon - I hear they have a good line, and decent QB.
4 - @ California - They actually played really well at home last season, lost some close gaymes.
5 - @ UCLA - How well does chip kelly do without Nick Aliotti?
6 - Stanford - probably my most autistic pick. I don't know, I just keep hoping they end up sucking.
7 - @ Washington State - I believe they will suck, but ultimately that is when they decide to show up for the Apple Cup. That being said, new DC, new QB (too soon?), new receivers, inability to run the ball, I still doog out on our chances.
8 - Colorado - really I just think they will take a step forward.
9 - Arizona State - Can't imagine them getting better.
10 - Oregon State - 85 pass plays to 4 runs.
11- BYU - BYU was horrible last season and I can't see them getting much better. BYU is the example for @Dennis_DeYoung of a roster filled with a bunch of white try hards.
12- North Dakota - Who? -
We? are going 1-11 with one win against Colorado.
-
the only thing I got out of that site was that UCLA under performs with their talent and are overrated. UW looks underrated and over performingYellowSnow said:
Damn it! Fucking Winsipedia.RaceBannon said:
1989?YellowSnow said:
Not so fun fact - we've only beat UCLA one fucking time ever in the Rose Bowl. 1995.Dennis_DeYoung said:
FUCKING CHRIST!
It was too small of a margin to notice. http://www.winsipedia.com/ucla/vs/washington -
serious one (as I said before on a thread lost somewhere in time, I love pointless rankings):
1. @ Auburn (probably a good team, nobody knows with them, with great talent, away game, big game Browning at helm. in realityy, the test of the season)
2. @ UCLA (up high because they are a serious wildcard: also a lot of talent, a potentially great coach, I like Modster and who knows really)
3. Stanford (the sight of their big WRs over Myles Bryant dead body)
4. @ Utah (never an easy game)
5. Arizona State (can't this be the year where UW just destroys them like they're supposed to?)
6. @ Oregon (it's 2018, Burmeister might have figured the zone read by that)
7. @ California (who cares)
8. BYU (fuck them forever)
9. @ Cougs
10. Colorado (the most pathetic team on a conference with the cougs in it)
11. Oregon State
12. North Dakota
-
I’m surprised I’m surprised how many of you fucksticks have apparently never seen an Apple Cup.
-
Everybody's lists are void without the inclusion of BYE. For some reason BYE seems to always fuck us over and we come out of it with injuries to important players. With the Pac-12 dreck next season I'd say other than Auburn BYE is by far the toughest opponent we'll face. Outside of a Browning injury god help us against BYE.
-
So does Brian Kelly.TheHB said:I think we? will boat race Ucla next year. Brian Kelly needs time to get his guys.
-
I'm amazed so many people have Arizona State as anything other than one of the easiest(Pac12) wins. Have none of you been following the ASU/Herm thread? The train is picking up speed before it goes over the cliff.
-
@AZDuck true? I have too much ASU PTSD built up over the past 20 years. We should curb stomp them at home this year, just not sure where they fall in the order of cupcake games in 2018.UW_Doog_Bot said:I'm amazed so many people have Arizona State as anything other than one of the easiest(Pac12) wins. Have none of you been following the ASU/Herm thread? The train is picking up speed before it goes over the cliff.
-
Ok legit stab at rankings.
1. @ Auburn (Pretty much a given that this is THE game on our schedule, cross country away game, lots of talent, national stage, Jake Browning against talented teams)
2. Stanford (Love came back, they have a QB, should be a big late season game for both teams)
3. @ Utah (Haven’t beaten them decisively yet in the Pete era and we are playing at their place with no Dante Pettis to bail us out)
4. @ UCLA (Most unknown. I’ll be much more worried in a year or two but for now huge questions at QB for them vs. we never win at the rosebowl)
5. @ California (They’ve been playing better and will be at home, still not a *tuff out though)
6. @ Oregon (Same coaching staff but lessened, recruiting didn’t turn the corner, we’ve crushed them 2 years in a row, I see no reason for anything to be different)
7. @ Cougs (We own the air raid)
8. Arizona State (I fully expect this team to be a 3 conf win team with Herm. The only reason they are higher than the other two conference teams is that they’ll still have some talent)
9. Colorado (Bottom feeder)
10. Oregon State (Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha)
11. BYU (This team is on track to go the way of the Vandals and move down divisions. The only significant advantage they used to have was a captive market but all the good underwear kids go other places now. Kaho!!!!)
12. North Dakota (Only down here by default.)
-
BYU is Fuct if they lose the monopoly on underwear kids. Love it. Fuck this guys! Provo Canyon is nice though.UW_Doog_Bot said:Ok legit stab at rankings.
1. @ Auburn (Pretty much a given that this is THE game on our schedule, cross country away game, lots of talent, national stage, Jake Browning against talented teams)
2. Stanford (Love came back, they have a QB, should be a big late season game for both teams)
3. @ Utah (Haven’t beaten them decisively yet in the Pete era and we are playing at their place with no Dante Pettis to bail us out)
4. @ UCLA (Most unknown. I’ll be much more worried in a year or two but for now huge questions at QB for them vs. we never win at the rosebowl)
5. @ California (They’ve been playing better and will be at home, still not a *tuff out though)
6. @ Oregon (Same coaching staff but lessened, recruiting didn’t turn the corner, we’ve crushed them 2 years in a row, I see no reason for anything to be different)
7. @ Cougs (We own the air raid)
8. Arizona State (I fully expect this team to be a 3 conf win team with Herm. The only reason they are higher than the other two conference teams is that they’ll still have some talent)
9. Colorado (Bottom feeder)
10. Oregon State (Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha)
11. BYU (This team is on track to go the way of the Vandals and move down divisions. The only significant advantage they used to have was a captive market but all the good underwear kids go other places now. Kaho!!!!)
12. North Dakota (Only down here by default.) -
They delayed the inevitable when the church finally decided that blacks weren't the cursed offspring of Cain, then when they started missionary-ing the poly's, but I think the move to complete independence has done what the Pac12 network has done to the Pac only much much worse for them. Short of Joseph Smith himself intervening I don't see them making it any higher than FBS mid-tier punching bag.YellowSnow said:
BYU is Fuct if they lose the monopoly on underwear kids. Love it. Fuck this guys! Provo Canyon is nice though.UW_Doog_Bot said:Ok legit stab at rankings.
1. @ Auburn (Pretty much a given that this is THE game on our schedule, cross country away game, lots of talent, national stage, Jake Browning against talented teams)
2. Stanford (Love came back, they have a QB, should be a big late season game for both teams)
3. @ Utah (Haven’t beaten them decisively yet in the Pete era and we are playing at their place with no Dante Pettis to bail us out)
4. @ UCLA (Most unknown. I’ll be much more worried in a year or two but for now huge questions at QB for them vs. we never win at the rosebowl)
5. @ California (They’ve been playing better and will be at home, still not a *tuff out though)
6. @ Oregon (Same coaching staff but lessened, recruiting didn’t turn the corner, we’ve crushed them 2 years in a row, I see no reason for anything to be different)
7. @ Cougs (We own the air raid)
8. Arizona State (I fully expect this team to be a 3 conf win team with Herm. The only reason they are higher than the other two conference teams is that they’ll still have some talent)
9. Colorado (Bottom feeder)
10. Oregon State (Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha)
11. BYU (This team is on track to go the way of the Vandals and move down divisions. The only significant advantage they used to have was a captive market but all the good underwear kids go other places now. Kaho!!!!)
12. North Dakota (Only down here by default.) -
Pete could really be onto something with offering slower strategy, underwear polys- i.e., come to UW for the church school, built for life thing, but have an actual chance to make to the CFP.UW_Doog_Bot said:
They delayed the inevitable when the church finally decided that blacks weren't the cursed offspring of Cain, then when they started missionary-ing the poly's, but I think the move to complete independence has done what the Pac12 network has done to the Pac only much much worse for them. Short of Joseph Smith himself intervening I don't see them making it any higher than FBS mid-tier punching bag.YellowSnow said:
BYU is Fuct if they lose the monopoly on underwear kids. Love it. Fuck this guys! Provo Canyon is nice though.UW_Doog_Bot said:Ok legit stab at rankings.
1. @ Auburn (Pretty much a given that this is THE game on our schedule, cross country away game, lots of talent, national stage, Jake Browning against talented teams)
2. Stanford (Love came back, they have a QB, should be a big late season game for both teams)
3. @ Utah (Haven’t beaten them decisively yet in the Pete era and we are playing at their place with no Dante Pettis to bail us out)
4. @ UCLA (Most unknown. I’ll be much more worried in a year or two but for now huge questions at QB for them vs. we never win at the rosebowl)
5. @ California (They’ve been playing better and will be at home, still not a *tuff out though)
6. @ Oregon (Same coaching staff but lessened, recruiting didn’t turn the corner, we’ve crushed them 2 years in a row, I see no reason for anything to be different)
7. @ Cougs (We own the air raid)
8. Arizona State (I fully expect this team to be a 3 conf win team with Herm. The only reason they are higher than the other two conference teams is that they’ll still have some talent)
9. Colorado (Bottom feeder)
10. Oregon State (Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha)
11. BYU (This team is on track to go the way of the Vandals and move down divisions. The only significant advantage they used to have was a captive market but all the good underwear kids go other places now. Kaho!!!!)
12. North Dakota (Only down here by default.)
Mahalo Pete!! -
The AZ doesnt stand for AZ!YellowSnow said:
@AZDuck true? I have too much ASU PTSD built up over the past 20 years. We should curb stomp them at home this year, just not sure where they fall in the order of cupcake games in 2018.UW_Doog_Bot said:I'm amazed so many people have Arizona State as anything other than one of the easiest(Pac12) wins. Have none of you been following the ASU/Herm thread? The train is picking up speed before it goes over the cliff.
-
No shit, shit hole fancy feaster. But he is the halfbrain train superiority guy.Pitchfork51 said:
The AZ doesnt stand for AZ!YellowSnow said:
@AZDuck true? I have too much ASU PTSD built up over the past 20 years. We should curb stomp them at home this year, just not sure where they fall in the order of cupcake games in 2018.UW_Doog_Bot said:I'm amazed so many people have Arizona State as anything other than one of the easiest(Pac12) wins. Have none of you been following the ASU/Herm thread? The train is picking up speed before it goes over the cliff.
-
It seems like 10-2 with a conference loss is a realistic projection looking at the schedule. If that happens I think we win the Norf', win the Pac(who in the South would beat us? USC if they end up with a QB?), and at least make another NY6. In this case, if we don't make the playoffs, that would mean playing the Rose right? I'd take that. Especially if we got over the hump and won it to end the season.
-
you guys really know how to set yourself up for disappointment
-
Spot on my robotic doog. Auburn is going to be tuff sledding for our Dwags. Is what it is. Honestly, if we aren't good enough to win a natty (we aren't) I want to go to my first Rose Bowl.UW_Doog_Bot said:It seems like 10-2 with a conference loss is a realistic projection looking at the schedule. If that happens I think we win the Norf', win the Pac(who in the South would beat us? USC if they end up with a QB?), and at least make another NY6. In this case, if we don't make the playoffs, that would mean playing the Rose right? I'd take that. Especially if we got over the hump and won it to end the season.
-
Notice I've got a lot of hedges in my statement. I believe in probability and statistics. I'd say there's easily a 2 game variance possible(and that's without major occurrences like injuries etc.) built into the range. 8-4 to 12-0 possible(though less likely, very few teams go undefeated) as well as 9-3 or 11-1 which I think are much more likely outcomes. I think if UW played this schedule 100 times the curve would come to rest right in that 10-2 or maybe 9-3 as the mode with a negative skew.Pitchfork51 said:you guys really know how to set yourself up for disappointment
That's at least how I would view our talent translating to probabilities of wins compared to the rest of the dreck we are playing. I expect Auburn to be a loss but most of the rest of the PAC looks like another year of dogshit. If we can't beat BYU and ND state then something is seriously wrong.
-
If we go to the Rose I'll be going with my pops. He's also UW alumni(class of 67', Chilton computer pictured below) and neither of us have ever been to a Rosebowl.YellowSnow said:
Spot on my robotic doog. Auburn is going to be tuff sledding for our Dwags. Is what it is. Honestly, if we aren't good enough to win a natty (we aren't) I want to go to my first Rose Bowl.UW_Doog_Bot said:It seems like 10-2 with a conference loss is a realistic projection looking at the schedule. If that happens I think we win the Norf', win the Pac(who in the South would beat us? USC if they end up with a QB?), and at least make another NY6. In this case, if we don't make the playoffs, that would mean playing the Rose right? I'd take that. Especially if we got over the hump and won it to end the season.
-
NoDak likely better than Oregon state
-
chinned becausse it looks impressive - didn't understand shit but looks very impressiveUW_Doog_Bot said:
Notice I've got a lot of hedges in my statement. I believe in probability and statistics. I'd say there's easily a 2 game variance possible(and that's without major occurrences like injuries etc.) built into the range. 8-4 to 12-0 possible(though less likely, very few teams go undefeated) as well as 9-3 or 11-1 which I think are much more likely outcomes. I think if UW played this schedule 100 times the curve would come to rest right in that 10-2 or maybe 9-3 as the mode with a negative skew.Pitchfork51 said:you guys really know how to set yourself up for disappointment
That's at least how I would view our talent translating to probabilities of wins compared to the rest of the dreck we are playing. I expect Auburn to be a loss but most of the rest of the PAC looks like another year of dogshit. If we can't beat BYU and ND state then something is seriously wrong. -
*chimpressiveLebamDawg said:
chinned becausse it looks impressive - didn't understand shit but looks very impressiveUW_Doog_Bot said:
Notice I've got a lot of hedges in my statement. I believe in probability and statistics. I'd say there's easily a 2 game variance possible(and that's without major occurrences like injuries etc.) built into the range. 8-4 to 12-0 possible(though less likely, very few teams go undefeated) as well as 9-3 or 11-1 which I think are much more likely outcomes. I think if UW played this schedule 100 times the curve would come to rest right in that 10-2 or maybe 9-3 as the mode with a negative skew.Pitchfork51 said:you guys really know how to set yourself up for disappointment
That's at least how I would view our talent translating to probabilities of wins compared to the rest of the dreck we are playing. I expect Auburn to be a loss but most of the rest of the PAC looks like another year of dogshit. If we can't beat BYU and ND state then something is seriously wrong. -
Do you have a player on the team named Chim?UW_Doog_Bot said:
*chimpressiveLebamDawg said:
chinned becausse it looks impressive - didn't understand shit but looks very impressiveUW_Doog_Bot said:
Notice I've got a lot of hedges in my statement. I believe in probability and statistics. I'd say there's easily a 2 game variance possible(and that's without major occurrences like injuries etc.) built into the range. 8-4 to 12-0 possible(though less likely, very few teams go undefeated) as well as 9-3 or 11-1 which I think are much more likely outcomes. I think if UW played this schedule 100 times the curve would come to rest right in that 10-2 or maybe 9-3 as the mode with a negative skew.Pitchfork51 said:you guys really know how to set yourself up for disappointment
That's at least how I would view our talent translating to probabilities of wins compared to the rest of the dreck we are playing. I expect Auburn to be a loss but most of the rest of the PAC looks like another year of dogshit. If we can't beat BYU and ND state then something is seriously wrong. -
Depending on the year BYU is a non cupcake but unfortunately for us they are in cupcake mode right now
@creepycoug remembers when the Canes opened the season in the Wasatch range and got beat when the Canes were the Canes -
Damn it. Dont drink and poast kids.
-
Wrong.gifUW_Doog_Bot said:Damn it. Dont drink and poast kids.
-
Is Oregon supposed to be good? Their idiotic fans are claiming an offseason natty, but I just don't see them as anything above 7-5 with Cristobal and the talent has dropped off from what it was from 2007-2014. There's no way I'd put them above fifth or sixth. Herbert never screamed anything beyond honorable mention All-Pack 12...no idea why he has so much hype...
I don't partake in these types of things in the winter before signing day...way too many variables...
