Chris Petersen versus the Pac

Here's how he's fared versus the schools of the Pac12:
Arizona St: 1-0
Oregon: 2-0
Oregon St: 2-0
Utah: 2-0
Washington: 1-2
For whatever reason, UW has his number. But dude's 7-0 against other schools from the conference. There's a reason plenty of big schools have come after him.
I would definitely LIPO if we hired him. Far superior to the Nussmeier/Wilcox type options, IMO.
Comments
-
I agree with your sentiment there - but we can do better than that. He would be an alright but underwhelming hire.dnc said:I would definitely LIPO if we hired him. Far superior to the Nussmeier/Wilcox type options, IMO.
-
He wouldn't even go for SC, so I think he's waste of time to even discuss. He'll slowly decay at BS, as they become what they were before.
-
PatHadenFS picked Sark over him.priapism said:He wouldn't even go for SC, so I think he's waste of time to even discuss. He'll slowly decay at BS, as they become what they were before.
-
Remember TCU against the world ... then the coach had to start playing that schedule week in and week out ... same with Utah ...
Easy to out coach people when you have time ... but to do it week in and week out ... different story. -
There's definitely risk.topdawgnc said:Remember TCU against the world ... then the coach had to start playing that schedule week in and week out ... same with Utah ...
Easy to out coach people when you have time ... but to do it week in and week out ... different story.
OTOH, Urban Meyer and Brian Kelly.
I'm not saying it's not a risk, it absolutely is. But it's a risk with legitimate upside, which is a hell of a lot better than David Cutcliffe.
-
Cutcliffe > Petersendnc said:
There's definitely risk.topdawgnc said:Remember TCU against the world ... then the coach had to start playing that schedule week in and week out ... same with Utah ...
Easy to out coach people when you have time ... but to do it week in and week out ... different story.
OTOH, Urban Meyer and Brian Kelly.
I'm not saying it's not a risk, it absolutely is. But it's a risk with legitimate upside, which is a hell of a lot better than David Cutcliffe.
simple fact -
You're talking to Ole Miss Superiority guy here.topdawgnc said:
Cutcliffe > Petersendnc said:
There's definitely risk.topdawgnc said:Remember TCU against the world ... then the coach had to start playing that schedule week in and week out ... same with Utah ...
Easy to out coach people when you have time ... but to do it week in and week out ... different story.
OTOH, Urban Meyer and Brian Kelly.
I'm not saying it's not a risk, it absolutely is. But it's a risk with legitimate upside, which is a hell of a lot better than David Cutcliffe.
simple fact
You're wrong.
-
-
Alright not what I heard, but wait for the story to come out eventually
-
Pat haden fs was playing chess, woodward on that checkers grind. Sark was the ruse, hth
-
Tells me everything I need to know about everyone on this board right now.topdawgnc said:
Cutcliffe > Petersendnc said:
There's definitely risk.topdawgnc said:Remember TCU against the world ... then the coach had to start playing that schedule week in and week out ... same with Utah ...
Easy to out coach people when you have time ... but to do it week in and week out ... different story.
OTOH, Urban Meyer and Brian Kelly.
I'm not saying it's not a risk, it absolutely is. But it's a risk with legitimate upside, which is a hell of a lot better than David Cutcliffe.
simple fact -
They both are shitty optionstopdawgnc said:
Cutcliffe > Petersendnc said:
There's definitely risk.topdawgnc said:Remember TCU against the world ... then the coach had to start playing that schedule week in and week out ... same with Utah ...
Easy to out coach people when you have time ... but to do it week in and week out ... different story.
OTOH, Urban Meyer and Brian Kelly.
I'm not saying it's not a risk, it absolutely is. But it's a risk with legitimate upside, which is a hell of a lot better than David Cutcliffe.
simple fact
-
You mean the Ole Miss, where Cutcliffe won 60% of his games?dnc said:
You're talking to Ole Miss Superiority guy here.topdawgnc said:
Cutcliffe > Petersendnc said:
There's definitely risk.topdawgnc said:Remember TCU against the world ... then the coach had to start playing that schedule week in and week out ... same with Utah ...
Easy to out coach people when you have time ... but to do it week in and week out ... different story.
OTOH, Urban Meyer and Brian Kelly.
I'm not saying it's not a risk, it absolutely is. But it's a risk with legitimate upside, which is a hell of a lot better than David Cutcliffe.
simple fact
You're wrong.
Sark like records at Ole Miss ... and division championships at Duke > Boise State winning. -
I would wager a shit load of money that Petersen, in the pac12 with the same teams, would be average. It's nice to spend 90% of you time ass raping teams and inflating your ego, until you stumble into a contest where your belief/ false respect alone is enough to keep you in the game. Put them in the PAC and he's just another coach.
-
Problem with that argument is it's fucking TCU. You don't think if Patterson bolted for A&M, etc, he'd have slightly more success? You can't recruit against Texas to TCU. You can't recruit against SC at Boise. You can at Washington.topdawgnc said:Remember TCU against the world ... then the coach had to start playing that schedule week in and week out ... same with Utah ...
Easy to out coach people when you have time ... but to do it week in and week out ... different story.
I'm not a big Peterson guy but I'm beginning to think the fucktards who want a coordinator might get their way. I'll take Peterson over a coordinator any day of the week. At least he's proven he can win. Deruyter hasn't proven he can win in a BCS conference. Neither has Bohl. But they've fucking won.
-
Meh. He was 25-23 in the SEC, and this was before the SEC was THE SEC. He had one good year when Eli was a senior and otherwise was 3-5 or 4-4 every season.topdawgnc said:
You mean the Ole Miss, where Cutcliffe won 60% of his games?dnc said:
You're talking to Ole Miss Superiority guy here.topdawgnc said:
Cutcliffe > Petersendnc said:
There's definitely risk.topdawgnc said:Remember TCU against the world ... then the coach had to start playing that schedule week in and week out ... same with Utah ...
Easy to out coach people when you have time ... but to do it week in and week out ... different story.
OTOH, Urban Meyer and Brian Kelly.
I'm not saying it's not a risk, it absolutely is. But it's a risk with legitimate upside, which is a hell of a lot better than David Cutcliffe.
simple fact
You're wrong.
Sark like records at Ole Miss ... and division championships at Duke > Boise State winning.
And he doesn't have division championships at Duke. He has one division championship and is going to get raped in the title game. He's four games over .500 in his career with the pending plungering set to move that to 3.
In 11 seasons as a head coach he has yet to win a conference championship.
He might be worse than Sark. -
Dude ... It's Duke and Ole Miss ...
You act like he took over Alabama
Anywho ...
I don't want Cutcliffe ... But I would take him over Petersen ... -
But Ty took Stanford to a rose bowl. It's not like it was SC or UW. It was Stanford.topdawgnc said:Dude ... It's Duke and Ole Miss ...
You act like he took over Alabama
Anywho ...
I don't want Cutcliffe ... But I would take him over Petersen ...
-
I would take Petersen over Cutcliffe.
We need to get a list of all the names that have been thrown out and then find a webtool that allows us to rank everyone and compare and compile the results. -
Mad_Son said:
I would take airborne herpes over full blown AIDS.
We need to get a list of all the names that have been thrown out and then find a webtool that allows us to rank everyone and compare and compile the results. -
Your TCU/Utah/BSU against the World logic peters out when considering the fact that any new coach hired by UW won't be asked to build his program at Montlake with TCU/Utah/BSU resources in terms of coaching staff salaries, facilities, recruiting power, roster talent and depth, etc. Any coach we hire from a successful mid-level head coaching experience will come with some risk as did Don James when hired so many years ago from Kent State, but it's far more preferable than some coordinator from a big-name BCS school such as Alabama or USC who has no experience as a successful head football coach.topdawgnc said:Remember TCU against the world ... then the coach had to start playing that schedule week in and week out ... same with Utah ...
Easy to out coach people when you have time ... but to do it week in and week out ... different story.
I'm biased, but I've always been impressed with the job Chris Peterson has done at BSU. He's in a rebuilding mode now, both with his staff of assistants which has gone through more than average attrition in recent years and in re-establishing player talent depth. The thing is Peterson's teams usually don't beat themselves with errors and mistakes and in that regard, his program at BSU is very....... Dawgfatherish. I also believe TCU's Gary Patterson would do better against the World if he were coaching at a bigger school such as Texas with far more resources than he's got at TCU.