But could Eason transfer and start next year?!?
Probably wouldn't go into effect immediately, but prayingdog.png
Comments
-
Fuck that rule. Open recruiting 247 poaching of current players players bailing if they don't play after 1 year total insanity cats and dogs living together
-
Coaches can so should players.BaldwinIV said:Fuck that rule. Open recruiting 247 poaching of current players players bailing if they don't play after 1 year total insanity cats and dogs living together
-
If it passes it should go into effect immediately. Otherwise thats like the ncaa saying fuck you to everyone who transfered this year.
-
So you need to keep recruiting a kid all 4-5 years he's at your school? LOI day means nothing? Sounds like lunacy.HuskyJW said:
Coaches can so should players. -
Sounds like roster management to me.
You make $5 Million/year. You just added a 10th assistant. Figure it out. -
Play this scenario out beyond college. If people want to bitch about coaches being able to leave whenever they want even when they have a contract! then I guess we should rip up all professional player contracts, too, when their coach leaves or is fired. Whether they are a paid pro or a college amateur it's the same thing in principle.
I would only support this model if it also allows coaches to cut shit players at the end of each season and have their scholly available for someone else. Could be combined with college athletes getting a stipend salary of some amount and it probably doesn't do anything to harm the big boy programs who can pay more to keep kids on the bench.
FYFMFE -
It's not the same thing in principle.BleachedAnusDawg said:Play this scenario out beyond college. If people want to bitch about coaches being able to leave whenever they want even when they have a contract! then I guess we should rip up all professional player contracts, too, when their coach leaves or is fired. Whether they are a paid pro or a college amateur it's the same thing in principle.
I would only support this model if it also allows coaches to cut shit players at the end of each season and have their scholly available for someone else. Could be combined with college athletes getting a stipend salary of some amount and it probably doesn't do anything to harm the big boy programs who can pay more to keep kids on the bench.
FYFMFE
Pros are paid. College players are not. That's a massively different level of commitment.
When the NCAA does the right thing and pays players then making them sit out a year to transfer is fine. Until then, this is the right move. -
Players are compensated. Please tell me which NFL team is going to pay an 18 year old who is 3-4 years away from being physically able to survive an NFL game.dnc said:
It's not the same thing in principle.
Pros are paid. College players are not. That's a massively different level of commitment.
When the NCAA does the right thing and pays players then making them sit out a year to transfer is fine. Until then, this is the right move. -
I am all for common sense reforms to the transfer rules that would give student athletes more say over where they play (and go to school, ha!), but this seems change seems like it might go a little too far.
-
This rule once again helps Petersen IMO. We? may get frustrated at times with his recruiting approach but it will be even more vital to recruit football players not recruiting all stars. Guys that love football and aren't afraid to compete won't bail at the first demotion
-
I'd be okay with this rule change if they limit the number of immediate transfers that schools can take to a max of like 2-3 per year. Otherwise some blue blood teams could consistently exploit this and essentially turn G5 and FCS schools (and even dreck P5 schools) into farm teams.
-
NEsnake12 said:
I'd be okay with this rule change if they limit the number of immediate transfers that schools can take to a max of like 2-3 per year. Otherwise some blue blood teams could consistently exploit this and essentially turn G5 and FCS schools (and even Pac 12 schools) into farm teams.
-
-
If that happens, he ain't transferring to UWUWhuskytskeet said:Actually, yeah. Maybe.
Probably wouldn't go into effect immediately, but prayingdog.png -
Cuogsbananasnblondes said:
If that happens, he ain't transferring to UW -
If this rule change happens, does it mean there is a better chance that we can convince Browning to transfer to Oregon State?
