Peterson: Better or Worse than Sark

Dawgtona · December 2013

Downgrade

I don't want any coach who managed to lose to Ty and Sark.

RoadDawg55 · December 2013

Upgrade

Let's be real, he's a huge upgrade.

fivehundredmileDAWG · December 2013

Upgrade

I don't think he's interested ... I feel he's an upgrade ... But so is a monkey. I am not a huge Petersen fan.

Homebrew_Dawg · December 2013

Upgrade

Fuck Tui would be an upgrade. That's how shitty Sark is. Peterson doesn't interest me.

RaccoonHarry · December 2013

Upgrade

Don't get the Petersen hate. Ever see Boise's recruit rankings? Don't think he leaves Boise for any job but he's a terrific coach.

mobey · December 2013

Upgrade

Agreed.

Peterson's concern is Hawkins and that other BS fuckwad.

Maybe Mark Few in disguise.

Still better than Sark though.

fivehundredmileDAWG said:
I don't think he's interested ... I feel he's an upgrade ... But so is a monkey. I am not a huge Petersen fan.

dnc · December 2013

Upgrade

I would LIPO with Petersen. It's a risky move, but it does have some upside. There are better options, but I wouldn't hate it.

MisterEm · December 2013

Upgrade

Something about Petersen doesn't sit right with me.

But his players love him - long after their BSU tenure. Players get better through the program as well. Something we've all longed for many moons...

Mad_Son · December 2013

Upgrade

dnc said:
I would LIPO with Petersen. It's a risky move, but it does have some upside. There are better options, but I wouldn't hate it.

Honestly I think I would feel about Peterson how I felt about Sark. Has upside and I'd let it play out, but it would still be a disappointment.

dnc · December 2013

Upgrade

Mad_Son said:

dnc said:
I would LIPO with Petersen. It's a risky move, but it does have some upside. There are better options, but I wouldn't hate it.
Honestly I think I would feel about Peterson how I felt about Sark. Has upside and I'd let it play out, but it would still be a disappointment.

Better hire than Sark was, IMO. Not a homerun hire, more like a solid B. Sark was C-, at best.

Mad_Son · December 2013

Upgrade

dnc said:

Mad_Son said:

dnc said:
I would LIPO with Petersen. It's a risky move, but it does have some upside. There are better options, but I wouldn't hate it.
Honestly I think I would feel about Peterson how I felt about Sark. Has upside and I'd let it play out, but it would still be a disappointment.
Better hire than Sark was, IMO. Not a homerun hire, more like a solid B. Sark was C-, at best.

I agree he is better than Sark, I just think I'd feel about the same since I am less optimistic now. Additionally Sark was much more of an unknown. I have seen a lot of Peterson and I think I have a better sense of what he does.

[Deleted User] · December 2013

Upgrade

He's an upgrade but Sark was an upgrade over Ty.

Just because you are an upgrade over a fucking turd doesn't mean you are good either.

dnc · December 2013

Upgrade

He_Needs_More_Time said:
He's an upgrade but Sark was an upgrade over Ty.

Just because you are an upgrade over a fucking turd doesn't mean you are good either.

#IncrementalProgress