Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb. 
Peterson: Better or Worse than Sark
 
            
                
                    DoogieMcDoogerson                
                
                    Member Posts: 2,524                
            
                        
            Comments
- 
            DowngradeI don't want any coach who managed to lose to Ty and Sark.
- 
            UpgradeLet's be real, he's a huge upgrade.
- 
            UpgradeI don't think he's interested ... I feel he's an upgrade ... But so is a monkey. I am not a huge Petersen fan.
- 
            UpgradeFuck Tui would be an upgrade. That's how shitty Sark is. Peterson doesn't interest me.
- 
            UpgradeDon't get the Petersen hate. Ever see Boise's recruit rankings? Don't think he leaves Boise for any job but he's a terrific coach.
- 
            UpgradeAgreed.
 Peterson's concern is Hawkins and that other BS fuckwad.
 Maybe Mark Few in disguise.
 Still better than Sark though.fivehundredmileDAWG said:I don't think he's interested ... I feel he's an upgrade ... But so is a monkey. I am not a huge Petersen fan. 
- 
            UpgradeI would LIPO with Petersen. It's a risky move, but it does have some upside. There are better options, but I wouldn't hate it.
- 
            UpgradeSomething about Petersen doesn't sit right with me.
 But his players love him - long after their BSU tenure. Players get better through the program as well. Something we've all longed for many moons...
- 
            Upgrade
 Honestly I think I would feel about Peterson how I felt about Sark. Has upside and I'd let it play out, but it would still be a disappointment.dnc said:I would LIPO with Petersen. It's a risky move, but it does have some upside. There are better options, but I wouldn't hate it. 
- 
            Upgrade
 Better hire than Sark was, IMO. Not a homerun hire, more like a solid B. Sark was C-, at best.Mad_Son said:
 Honestly I think I would feel about Peterson how I felt about Sark. Has upside and I'd let it play out, but it would still be a disappointment.dnc said:I would LIPO with Petersen. It's a risky move, but it does have some upside. There are better options, but I wouldn't hate it. 
 
- 
            Upgrade
 I agree he is better than Sark, I just think I'd feel about the same since I am less optimistic now. Additionally Sark was much more of an unknown. I have seen a lot of Peterson and I think I have a better sense of what he does.dnc said:
 Better hire than Sark was, IMO. Not a homerun hire, more like a solid B. Sark was C-, at best.Mad_Son said:
 Honestly I think I would feel about Peterson how I felt about Sark. Has upside and I'd let it play out, but it would still be a disappointment.dnc said:I would LIPO with Petersen. It's a risky move, but it does have some upside. There are better options, but I wouldn't hate it. 
- 
            UpgradeHe's an upgrade but Sark was an upgrade over Ty.
 Just because you are an upgrade over a fucking turd doesn't mean you are good either.
- 
            Upgrade
 #IncrementalProgressHe_Needs_More_Time said:He's an upgrade but Sark was an upgrade over Ty. 
 Just because you are an upgrade over a fucking turd doesn't mean you are good either.
 
- 
            Where is the field? Is a rabbit pellet shit or a log crap better...the idea of both is to get them out of my system.
- 
            UpgradeData: ( Yes, I know their conference sucks )
 http://cfbdatawarehouse.com/data/div_ia/mountainwest/boise_state/2010-2014_yearly_results.php
 and
 http://cfbdatawarehouse.com/data/div_ia/mountainwest/boise_state/2005-2009_yearly_results.php
 I think it would be a substantial upgrade.
- 
            UpgradeSark had as much head coaching experience as woody has heterosexual intercourse






![[Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/b14605887e2b6b59902271a0095c9265_100.png)



















