Signees

2001400ex · December 2017

Can someone put together a list of schools and how many commits signed compared to how many commits they have? Cause I'm lazy. And @Swaye I'll fuck this up and I'm not even good enough to be your apprentice, but here goes.

photo 1e1960eb2654427ddcaea02492e00cdb_zps6s3pt1cz.jpg

photo 756c0a9ec024a9c622604fb9a52f177d_zpsaltnut5f.jpg

Swaye · December 2017

You did not fuck this one up at all.

PineapplePirate · December 2017

bananasnblondes · December 2017

UW - 18 signed, 0 still looking around
WSU - 18 signed, 5 still looking
Oregon - 13 signed, 7 still looking
OSU - 11 signed, 0 still looking
Stanford - 10 signed, 3 still looking
Cal - 18 signed, 0 still looking
SC - 8 signed, 3 still looking
UCLA - 8 signed, 3 still looking
The rest - NOC

Swaye · December 2017

bananasnblondes said:
UW - 18 signed, 0 still looking around
WSU - 18 signed, 5 still looking
Oregon - 13 signed, 7 still looking
OSU - 11 signed, 0 still looking
Stanford - 10 signed, 3 still looking
Cal - 18 signed, 0 still looking
SC - 8 signed, 3 still looking
UCLA - 8 signed, 3 still looking
The rest - NOC

This will be an important metric in future years I think. The teams that can nail down a relatively full class early are significantly advantaged from a resourcing perspective for both late onesie twosies in the current cycle and laying groundwork for the next cycle.

Cal and UW were far and away the best this year. I do think USC is sort of a special case in that they are playing a different higher end game where they think there is self interest in NOT filling their class early, to try and cherry pick 5 stars or whatever. But, for most all teams with the exception of the blue blood goliaths, getting a 95% class signed in December is a huge advantage. I think UW will always be near tops in the conference in this under Pete - and shows he understands how resourcing works and makes it a central focus of our efforts. Efficiency wins in almost all markets, and I doubt CFB is an exception.

In short, I have a big fat red boner.

biak1 · December 2017

I would have assumed Stanford would close all of their commits due to the nature and similarity of their program to Pete’s.

USC and UCLA will almost always play the waiting game because they can afford to Bruce Wayne it and dick over the rest of the PAC schools.

YellowSnow · December 2017

Swaye said:

bananasnblondes said:
UW - 18 signed, 0 still looking around
WSU - 18 signed, 5 still looking
Oregon - 13 signed, 7 still looking
OSU - 11 signed, 0 still looking
Stanford - 10 signed, 3 still looking
Cal - 18 signed, 0 still looking
SC - 8 signed, 3 still looking
UCLA - 8 signed, 3 still looking
The rest - NOC
This will be an important metric in future years I think. The teams that can nail down a relatively full class early are significantly advantaged from a resourcing perspective for both late onesie twosies in the current cycle and laying groundwork for the next cycle.

Cal and UW were far and away the best this year. I do think USC is sort of a special case in that they are playing a different higher end game where they think there is self interest in NOT filling their class early, to try and cherry pick 5 stars or whatever. But, for most all teams with the exception of the blue blood goliaths, getting a 95% class signed in December is a huge advantage. I think UW will always be near tops in the conference in this under Pete - and shows he understands how resourcing works and makes it a central focus of our efforts. Efficiency wins in almost all markets, and I doubt CFB is an exception.

~~In short,~~ I have a ~~big fat~~ short red boner.

Sorry @dnc

Swaye · December 2017

YellowSnow said:

Swaye said:

bananasnblondes said:
UW - 18 signed, 0 still looking around
WSU - 18 signed, 5 still looking
Oregon - 13 signed, 7 still looking
OSU - 11 signed, 0 still looking
Stanford - 10 signed, 3 still looking
Cal - 18 signed, 0 still looking
SC - 8 signed, 3 still looking
UCLA - 8 signed, 3 still looking
The rest - NOC
This will be an important metric in future years I think. The teams that can nail down a relatively full class early are significantly advantaged from a resourcing perspective for both late onesie twosies in the current cycle and laying groundwork for the next cycle.

Cal and UW were far and away the best this year. I do think USC is sort of a special case in that they are playing a different higher end game where they think there is self interest in NOT filling their class early, to try and cherry pick 5 stars or whatever. But, for most all teams with the exception of the blue blood goliaths, getting a 95% class signed in December is a huge advantage. I think UW will always be near tops in the conference in this under Pete - and shows he understands how resourcing works and makes it a central focus of our efforts. Efficiency wins in almost all markets, and I doubt CFB is an exception.

~~In short,~~ I have a ~~big fat~~ short red boner.
Sorry @dnc

He loves me for who I am.

2001400ex · December 2017

bananasnblondes said:
UW - 18 signed, 0 still looking around
WSU - 18 signed, 5 still looking
Oregon - 13 signed, 7 still looking
OSU - 11 signed, 0 still looking
Stanford - 10 signed, 3 still looking
Cal - 18 signed, 0 still looking
SC - 8 signed, 3 still looking
UCLA - 8 signed, 3 still looking
The rest - NOC

Nice work!!!

Cal still too high. Oh wait.

UWhuskytskeet · December 2017

biak1 said:
I would have assumed Stanford would close all of their commits due to the nature and similarity of their program to Pete’s.

USC and UCLA will almost always play the waiting game because they can afford to Bruce Wayne it and dick over the rest of the PAC schools.

I might be misremembering, but I think Stanford doesn't get their admissions process completely finished until late December or even January. Some kids may still be waiting.

bananasnblondes · December 2017

The February scramble between SC, UCLA, Bama, tOSU, etc. for the remaining attention- whore recruits will be fun to watch. It will be like 1:45 at the bar and the hot chick hasn't gone home with anyone yet.

Swaye · December 2017

bananasnblondes said:
The February scramble between SC, UCLA, Bama, tOSU, etc. for the remaining attention- whore recruits will be fun to watch. It will be like 1:45 at the bar and the hot chick hasn't gone home with anyone yet.

Just wait until I get my reads down.

bananasnblondes · December 2017

Fun fact: the recruiting class from the state of Oregon was amazing this year - 7 4-stars.

2 signed with UW, 1 with Oregon

2001400ex · December 2017

bananasnblondes said:
Fun fact: the recruiting class from the state of Oregon was amazing this year - 7 4-stars.

2 signed with UW, 1 with Oregon

Where are the other 4?

Dennis_DeYoung · December 2017

2001400ex said:

bananasnblondes said:
Fun fact: the recruiting class from the state of Oregon was amazing this year - 7 4-stars.

2 signed with UW, 1 with Oregon
Where are the other 4?

Talanoa Hufanga didn't sign, but looks like he will with USC. Ugh. DDY3. My favorite DB on the WC. Ugh.

Chase Cota signed with UCLA

Braden Lenzy hasn't signed. Probably will go to Notre Dame, but hard to tell.

Elijah Winston hasn't signed. Was committed to UO, but got an offer from USC.

dnc · December 2017

YellowSnow said:

Swaye said:

bananasnblondes said:
UW - 18 signed, 0 still looking around
WSU - 18 signed, 5 still looking
Oregon - 13 signed, 7 still looking
OSU - 11 signed, 0 still looking
Stanford - 10 signed, 3 still looking
Cal - 18 signed, 0 still looking
SC - 8 signed, 3 still looking
UCLA - 8 signed, 3 still looking
The rest - NOC
This will be an important metric in future years I think. The teams that can nail down a relatively full class early are significantly advantaged from a resourcing perspective for both late onesie twosies in the current cycle and laying groundwork for the next cycle.

Cal and UW were far and away the best this year. I do think USC is sort of a special case in that they are playing a different higher end game where they think there is self interest in NOT filling their class early, to try and cherry pick 5 stars or whatever. But, for most all teams with the exception of the blue blood goliaths, getting a 95% class signed in December is a huge advantage. I think UW will always be near tops in the conference in this under Pete - and shows he understands how resourcing works and makes it a central focus of our efforts. Efficiency wins in almost all markets, and I doubt CFB is an exception.

~~In short,~~ I have a ~~big fat~~ short red boner.
Sorry @dnc

It’s not the size of the arrow, it’s the force of the bow

Swaye · December 2017

dnc said:

YellowSnow said:

Swaye said:

bananasnblondes said:
UW - 18 signed, 0 still looking around
WSU - 18 signed, 5 still looking
Oregon - 13 signed, 7 still looking
OSU - 11 signed, 0 still looking
Stanford - 10 signed, 3 still looking
Cal - 18 signed, 0 still looking
SC - 8 signed, 3 still looking
UCLA - 8 signed, 3 still looking
The rest - NOC
This will be an important metric in future years I think. The teams that can nail down a relatively full class early are significantly advantaged from a resourcing perspective for both late onesie twosies in the current cycle and laying groundwork for the next cycle.

Cal and UW were far and away the best this year. I do think USC is sort of a special case in that they are playing a different higher end game where they think there is self interest in NOT filling their class early, to try and cherry pick 5 stars or whatever. But, for most all teams with the exception of the blue blood goliaths, getting a 95% class signed in December is a huge advantage. I think UW will always be near tops in the conference in this under Pete - and shows he understands how resourcing works and makes it a central focus of our efforts. Efficiency wins in almost all markets, and I doubt CFB is an exception.

~~In short,~~ I have a ~~big fat~~ short red boner.
Sorry @dnc
It’s not the size of the arrow, it’s the force of the bow

NEsnake12 · December 2017

bananasnblondes said:
The February scramble between SC, UCLA, Bama, tOSU, etc. for the remaining attention- whore recruits will be fun to watch. It will be like 1:45 at the bar and the hot chick hasn't gone home with anyone yet.

And all the while, Pete is done fucking and is already planning which chicks he's going to take home in 2019

theknowledge · December 2017

Swaye said:

bananasnblondes said:
UW - 18 signed, 0 still looking around
WSU - 18 signed, 5 still looking
Oregon - 13 signed, 7 still looking
OSU - 11 signed, 0 still looking
Stanford - 10 signed, 3 still looking
Cal - 18 signed, 0 still looking
SC - 8 signed, 3 still looking
UCLA - 8 signed, 3 still looking
The rest - NOC
This will be an important metric in future years I think. The teams that can nail down a relatively full class early are significantly advantaged from a resourcing perspective for both late onesie twosies in the current cycle and laying groundwork for the next cycle.

Cal and UW were far and away the best this year. I do think USC is sort of a special case in that they are playing a different higher end game where they think there is self interest in NOT filling their class early, to try and cherry pick 5 stars or whatever. But, for most all teams with the exception of the blue blood goliaths, getting a 95% class signed in December is a huge advantage. I think UW will always be near tops in the conference in this under Pete - and shows he understands how resourcing works and makes it a central focus of our efforts. Efficiency wins in almost all markets, and I doubt CFB is an exception.

In short, I have a big fat red boner.

You learned to write real good at Orkin College. This reads nice.

Swaye · December 2017

theknowledge said:

Swaye said:

bananasnblondes said:
UW - 18 signed, 0 still looking around
WSU - 18 signed, 5 still looking
Oregon - 13 signed, 7 still looking
OSU - 11 signed, 0 still looking
Stanford - 10 signed, 3 still looking
Cal - 18 signed, 0 still looking
SC - 8 signed, 3 still looking
UCLA - 8 signed, 3 still looking
The rest - NOC
This will be an important metric in future years I think. The teams that can nail down a relatively full class early are significantly advantaged from a resourcing perspective for both late onesie twosies in the current cycle and laying groundwork for the next cycle.

Cal and UW were far and away the best this year. I do think USC is sort of a special case in that they are playing a different higher end game where they think there is self interest in NOT filling their class early, to try and cherry pick 5 stars or whatever. But, for most all teams with the exception of the blue blood goliaths, getting a 95% class signed in December is a huge advantage. I think UW will always be near tops in the conference in this under Pete - and shows he understands how resourcing works and makes it a central focus of our efforts. Efficiency wins in almost all markets, and I doubt CFB is an exception.

In short, I have a big fat red boner.
You learned to write real good at Orkin College. This reads nice.

Howdy, Stranger!

Quick Links

Signees

Comments