Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

#14 Colson "BRB, YO." Yankoff

RhythmicSlappingDawg
RhythmicSlappingDawg Member Posts: 1,176
edited December 2017 in The Fisching Hole (Recruiting)


BRB, yo.
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Comments

  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,052
    BRB, YO
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,052
    DerekJohnson said:

    Of the Coney Island Yankoffs?

    There are multiple yankoffs.

    The first 6 are consensual.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PineapplePirate
    PineapplePirate Member Posts: 4,642
    Who painted that McFarlane action figure? Paint me one
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,098
    Reminds me a lot of Locker ... in a good way.

    I definitely think that there's room for both Sirmon and Yankoff to play in our system together ...

    Can definitely see scenarios where we want to go heavy on the run game and putting Yankoff in in place of a Wildcat can create a situation where we maintain a run/pass option.

    Will obviously be chinteresting to see how the Sirmon vs Yankoff QB competition goes.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • FKA_Mousecop
    FKA_Mousecop Member Posts: 2,054
    Tequilla said:

    Reminds me a lot of Locker ... in a good way.

    I definitely think that there's room for both Sirmon and Yankoff to play in our system together ...

    Can definitely see scenarios where we want to go heavy on the run game and putting Yankoff in in place of a Wildcat can create a situation where we maintain a run/pass option.

    Will obviously be chinteresting to see how the Sirmon vs Yankoff QB competition goes.

    I just don't think in today's landscape that you can have 2 QBs splitting duties like that longer than maybe a year.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Gladstone
    Gladstone Member Posts: 16,419
    FKA_Mousecop said:

    Tequilla said:

    Reminds me a lot of Locker ... in a good way.

    I definitely think that there's room for both Sirmon and Yankoff to play in our system together ...

    Can definitely see scenarios where we want to go heavy on the run game and putting Yankoff in in place of a Wildcat can create a situation where we maintain a run/pass option.

    Will obviously be chinteresting to see how the Sirmon vs Yankoff QB competition goes.

    I just don't think in today's landscape that you can have 2 QBs splitting duties like that longer than maybe a year.
    agreed

    no fucking thanks
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,098
    FKA_Mousecop said:

    Tequilla said:

    Reminds me a lot of Locker ... in a good way.

    I definitely think that there's room for both Sirmon and Yankoff to play in our system together ...

    Can definitely see scenarios where we want to go heavy on the run game and putting Yankoff in in place of a Wildcat can create a situation where we maintain a run/pass option.

    Will obviously be chinteresting to see how the Sirmon vs Yankoff QB competition goes.

    I just don't think in today's landscape that you can have 2 QBs splitting duties like that longer than maybe a year.
    If neither of them transfer, I think they both will be able to be starting QBs at UW at some point along the line.

    But to your point, it's why it's so important that we're following up the 2018 class at QB with strong options in 2019 and 2020 as well in case there is a future transfer.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter