Yeah like I really care how many stars they have
Comments
-
Nothing better than a top shelf pool.
-
but that just means Larry's got the TV market for Olympic sports repeats all to himself today.RaceBannon said:I think recruiting is where ESPN bias for the SEC and Urban's cock is most obvious
But the SEC Network is being innovative and drawing viewers with a recruiting special today so ESPN is going to feed their own
Guess which innovative network is NOT covering recruiting and told ESPN to fuck off we can do it alone? -
Thank you for this.Dennis_DeYoung said:Stars matter in aggregate especially. Your star averages are generally pretty important. No single kid's ranking means much, but in aggregate it's a good look into who is getting what.
It also tells you what 'area' you're recruiting in. If you are getting a bunch of 4-star guys, and some guys are rated 4 and 5 by different services (I believe Sirmon, Kaho and Spiker are all 5-stars somewhere at this point) you know you are getting guys that are at the elite level.
It's unlikely the 3-stars of a class are as good for a 3.00 star average class than a 3.85 star-average class. Because our coaches don't really pay attention to that, it just shows you the kind of pool they're recruiting in.
You get me all prepared for the worst class ever then get all positive and stuff
I guess I can't handle the ups and downs of DDY's manic personality -
I too like some stars. I want a little sizzle with my steak. It is fun to look back at past recruiting classes and see where those high numbered stars guys are now.
