Rough day for CNN...

But the news people aren't biased..................................

CNN is now the Soviet era Pravda.

first there was Tokyo Rose. Today it's hondo hose

GrundleStiltzkin said:

Unconscionable that they could fuck this up. Moore is dirty AF and doing a damn fine job chincriminating himself. All CNN has to do is stay out of the way. They simply could not hold back could they.

Exactly. You don't really need to do much with Moore. It should take care of itself by its very nature; moreover, there is no way to write or say anything that would ever dissuade anybody who supports him anyway from continuing to do so.

doogie said:

Evidence of a crime or STFU creepyhondo

Unlike you, I'm not a faux idealogue. His record on the bench is enough for me to not want him in the US Senate:

Among Moore’s 10 dissents was the case of David Pittman, who had pleaded guilty to the rape of a 12-year-old girl. Moore in September 2015 said that Pittman ought to have been allowed to present evidence to court indicating that the girl had been sexually active and had a sexually transmitted disease.

“I believe this evidence could be relevant to the complaining witness’s alleged motive in accusing Pittman and that it is not barred by … the rape-shield rule,” Moore wrote in his dissent.

Like other states, Alabama has a law generally barring defendants accused of sexual assaults from using evidence relating to their accuser’s sexual history. Alabama’s law includes an exception that says evidence can be used if “excluding it would violate the defendant’s constitutional rights”. Moore argued that Pittman was being denied his right to be confronted by any witnesses testifying against him.

I have no idea what he has or has not done with underage people, though there is a lot of smoke over there.

If you think that there is a point to admitting evidence of a 12-year old girl's promiscuity in a sexual assault case, then there's something gravely wrong with you. Couching it in terms of confronting your accuser is laughable legal theory. He has a shit-load of other dissents in these sexual assault cases, and those that I've read are like krisvashon tortured logic all leading to the same premise: if she's loose, we oughta know about it.

That's one thing in a typical case involving adults. It's quite another when you're dealing with children. He apparently doesn't appreciate the distinction, and perhaps neither do you.

dflea said:

doogie is a cunt.

Keep that in mind going forward and you'll be better off.

He wants evidence damnit!!!!!!!!!!

Sledog said:

But the news people aren't biased..................................

Nobody with a brain has ever said otherwise. Everyone knows the media has historically had a left-leaning bent. But it's not kept, say, the NYT or WP from busting out a story that buries a liberal hero. So it's not like we can say it hasn't worked. And the established media corrects itself and posts retractions. All the major papers always have.

So, call me crazy, but I think it's fs to discount the main stream media as being this giant corrupt thing out to get all your fanatical friends.

Moore would not have survived 5 minutes in the party of Reagan. And Racebannon knows it; although I appreciate that you and doogie do not.

creepycoug said:

Sledog said:

But the news people aren't biased..................................

Nobody with a brain has ever said otherwise. Everyone knows the media has historically had a left-leaning bent. But it's not kept, say, the NYT or WP from busting out a story that buries a liberal hero. So it's not like we can say it hasn't worked. And the established media corrects itself and posts retractions. All the major papers always have.

So, call me crazy, but I think it's fs to discount the main stream media as being this giant corrupt thing out to get all your fanatical friends.

Moore would not have survived 5 minutes in the party of Reagan. And Racebannon knows it; although I appreciate that you and doogie do not.

The media has become far more left oriented. So much so that they admit slanting everything to help a candidate for president. Name when that has happened in the not so distant past?

We have had movies about assassinating sitting presidents, entire TV shows dedicated to slurring one side and supporting the other etc. This was not the norm.

Swaye said:

2001400ex said:

http://twitter.com/FoxNews/status/903088793711935488

Wood smash enthusiastically

Do the drapes match the carpet?