Jesse PalmerFS
And then immediately jumps into 'we saw that last year with Washington', citing no evidence. He's actually dogged UW for this 3x now in the last half hour. Only problem is that he either purposefully ignores like-for-like evidence which would dismantle his claim or he's just Jesse PalmerFuckingStupid. I'm going with the latter.
But last year's final CFP rankings included Utah at #10, Stanford at #18, Utah at #19 and then the Cuogs were technically 28th.
So his argument is essentially that:
Wins against 17 and 23 ==== Wins against 10, 18, 19, 28. Go shave your twat, Jesse. Nobody has/had argued that UW's wins were unparalleled but 4 top 30 wins, 3 top 20, and 1 top 10 is nothing to be embarrassed about. And it's far superior to 2 top 30 wins with 1 top 20. **
**'The V' ended up 31st in this week's AP poll
Comments
-
Chinned for twat shaving...
-
It's hard when you have to rely on that SEC!!! education
-
JesseFS is dreamy though.
I'd fuck him for a shot at the rose ceremony.
-
Ehl o ehl you trying to make last season sound tuff. Kreist. Colorado from the soufflé. 'Nuff said. Fuck office doog.DugtheDoog said:Anybody hear Palmer a few minutes ago lament the fact that the playoff committee doesn't pay attention to 'who you beat'? He cites Alabama whose best win was against #17 LSU and then #23 Starkvegas. Okay, he uses evidence and makes a fair argument.
And then immediately jumps into 'we saw that last year with Washington', citing no evidence. He's actually dogged UW for this 3x now in the last half hour. Only problem is that he either purposefully ignores like-for-like evidence which would dismantle his claim or he's just Jesse PalmerFuckingStupid. I'm going with the latter.
But last year's final CFP rankings included Utah at #10, Stanford at #18, Utah at #19 and then the Cuogs were technically 28th.
So his argument is essentially that:
Wins against 17 and 23 ==== Wins against 10, 18, 19, 28. Go shave your twat, Jesse. Nobody has/had argued that UW's wins were unparalleled but 4 top 30 wins, 3 top 20, and 1 top 10 is nothing to be embarrassed about. And it's far superior to 2 top 30 wins with 1 top 20. **
**'The V' ended up 31st in this week's AP poll -
Great showing by the Canes yesterdaycreepycoug said:
Ehl o ehl you trying to make last season sound tuff. Kreist. Colorado from the soufflé. 'Nuff said. Fuck office doog.DugtheDoog said:Anybody hear Palmer a few minutes ago lament the fact that the playoff committee doesn't pay attention to 'who you beat'? He cites Alabama whose best win was against #17 LSU and then #23 Starkvegas. Okay, he uses evidence and makes a fair argument.
And then immediately jumps into 'we saw that last year with Washington', citing no evidence. He's actually dogged UW for this 3x now in the last half hour. Only problem is that he either purposefully ignores like-for-like evidence which would dismantle his claim or he's just Jesse PalmerFuckingStupid. I'm going with the latter.
But last year's final CFP rankings included Utah at #10, Stanford at #18, Utah at #19 and then the Cuogs were technically 28th.
So his argument is essentially that:
Wins against 17 and 23 ==== Wins against 10, 18, 19, 28. Go shave your twat, Jesse. Nobody has/had argued that UW's wins were unparalleled but 4 top 30 wins, 3 top 20, and 1 top 10 is nothing to be embarrassed about. And it's far superior to 2 top 30 wins with 1 top 20. **
**'The V' ended up 31st in this week's AP poll -
NYBEPostGameOrangeSlices said:
Great showing by the Canes yesterdaycreepycoug said:
Ehl o ehl you trying to make last season sound tuff. Kreist. Colorado from the soufflé. 'Nuff said. Fuck office doog.DugtheDoog said:Anybody hear Palmer a few minutes ago lament the fact that the playoff committee doesn't pay attention to 'who you beat'? He cites Alabama whose best win was against #17 LSU and then #23 Starkvegas. Okay, he uses evidence and makes a fair argument.
And then immediately jumps into 'we saw that last year with Washington', citing no evidence. He's actually dogged UW for this 3x now in the last half hour. Only problem is that he either purposefully ignores like-for-like evidence which would dismantle his claim or he's just Jesse PalmerFuckingStupid. I'm going with the latter.
But last year's final CFP rankings included Utah at #10, Stanford at #18, Utah at #19 and then the Cuogs were technically 28th.
So his argument is essentially that:
Wins against 17 and 23 ==== Wins against 10, 18, 19, 28. Go shave your twat, Jesse. Nobody has/had argued that UW's wins were unparalleled but 4 top 30 wins, 3 top 20, and 1 top 10 is nothing to be embarrassed about. And it's far superior to 2 top 30 wins with 1 top 20. **
**'The V' ended up 31st in this week's AP poll
-
Wasn't the Canes best effort either...creepycoug said:
NYBE
-
And despite all of that, still LOL at trying to revise last season as tuff. Every single poster on this board with a mental pulse was lamenting how shit the conference was last season as well as Washington's out of the conference schedule. You lost to the two good teams you played. And your conference champ opponent was Colorado fs Who got Bent over by Okie State. Come on. Fuck off.LesGrossman said: -
Guess you just can't help yourself. Grasping at straws much?creepycoug said:
And despite all of that, still LOL at trying to revise last season as tuff.LesGrossman said:
Nobody is fucking arguing that last season's schedule was Pat Hill TUFF!!! Using facts to argue UWs 'who you beat' is superior to another team says nothing about its ability to stand up as tough against all teams nationally.
Two different arguments. You're either beyond Jesse PalmerFS yourself or you were simply trying too damn hard to see something that wasn't there. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt this time... -
This thread is AIDS
