The cougs suck
There's only one thing worse and gayer than the cuogs, and that is brady Quinn.
FUCK THEM UP!!! EMBARRASS THEM!
Are cuog fans still MAD at Jimmy Lake?
Seriously annoying we can't clinch the North after this epic ass kicking. UW, Stanford, and WSU all have a loss to a North division opponent. So the North champion should be the team that lost to the highest ranked North team in the final standings which would be UW. So what the fuck? UW lost to Stanford but Stanford lost to WSU. WSU will finish lower in the division standings than Stanford. Stanford's loss is worse. This is stupid. It's hard:Stanford 7-2Washington 7-2Washington State 6-3 South division games don't matter. Like I said both teams have one North division loss. Head-to-head tie breaker is stupid. So Stanford could have beaten WSU but lost to Oregon State one of the worst teams in the country but as long as they beat UW they're in. If you have two teams that are 4-1 you should judge them by their loss because that encapsulates the two team's performances against the entire division instead of their performance in just one division game. Holy fuck you are retarded.All nine conference games matter.Go back to Doogman where you belong. No they don't. South games have no bearing on who wins the North. So let's play this out.....................You go 4-1 in the north, and winless in the south, so you should represent the north in the title game b/c you beat OSU/Wazzu/Oregon/Cal and lose to stanford? God that is fucking laughable beyond DM.C. Ruth, put down the keyboard and step back into Kems underpants. Under the current rules if a North team gets beat by every South division opponent they play but beats every other North team that team wins the North division. Those are the fucking rules bitch. Sorry you're fucking dumb and didn't know that.
Seriously annoying we can't clinch the North after this epic ass kicking. UW, Stanford, and WSU all have a loss to a North division opponent. So the North champion should be the team that lost to the highest ranked North team in the final standings which would be UW. So what the fuck? UW lost to Stanford but Stanford lost to WSU. WSU will finish lower in the division standings than Stanford. Stanford's loss is worse. This is stupid. It's hard:Stanford 7-2Washington 7-2Washington State 6-3 South division games don't matter. Like I said both teams have one North division loss. Head-to-head tie breaker is stupid. So Stanford could have beaten WSU but lost to Oregon State one of the worst teams in the country but as long as they beat UW they're in. If you have two teams that are 4-1 you should judge them by their loss because that encapsulates the two team's performances against the entire division instead of their performance in just one division game. Holy fuck you are retarded.All nine conference games matter.Go back to Doogman where you belong. No they don't. South games have no bearing on who wins the North. So let's play this out.....................You go 4-1 in the north, and winless in the south, so you should represent the north in the title game b/c you beat OSU/Wazzu/Oregon/Cal and lose to stanford? God that is fucking laughable beyond DM.C. Ruth, put down the keyboard and step back into Kems underpants.
Seriously annoying we can't clinch the North after this epic ass kicking. UW, Stanford, and WSU all have a loss to a North division opponent. So the North champion should be the team that lost to the highest ranked North team in the final standings which would be UW. So what the fuck? UW lost to Stanford but Stanford lost to WSU. WSU will finish lower in the division standings than Stanford. Stanford's loss is worse. This is stupid. It's hard:Stanford 7-2Washington 7-2Washington State 6-3 South division games don't matter. Like I said both teams have one North division loss. Head-to-head tie breaker is stupid. So Stanford could have beaten WSU but lost to Oregon State one of the worst teams in the country but as long as they beat UW they're in. If you have two teams that are 4-1 you should judge them by their loss because that encapsulates the two team's performances against the entire division instead of their performance in just one division game. Holy fuck you are retarded.All nine conference games matter.Go back to Doogman where you belong. No they don't. South games have no bearing on who wins the North.
Seriously annoying we can't clinch the North after this epic ass kicking. UW, Stanford, and WSU all have a loss to a North division opponent. So the North champion should be the team that lost to the highest ranked North team in the final standings which would be UW. So what the fuck? UW lost to Stanford but Stanford lost to WSU. WSU will finish lower in the division standings than Stanford. Stanford's loss is worse. This is stupid. It's hard:Stanford 7-2Washington 7-2Washington State 6-3 South division games don't matter. Like I said both teams have one North division loss. Head-to-head tie breaker is stupid. So Stanford could have beaten WSU but lost to Oregon State one of the worst teams in the country but as long as they beat UW they're in. If you have two teams that are 4-1 you should judge them by their loss because that encapsulates the two team's performances against the entire division instead of their performance in just one division game. Holy fuck you are retarded.All nine conference games matter.Go back to Doogman where you belong.
Seriously annoying we can't clinch the North after this epic ass kicking. UW, Stanford, and WSU all have a loss to a North division opponent. So the North champion should be the team that lost to the highest ranked North team in the final standings which would be UW. So what the fuck? UW lost to Stanford but Stanford lost to WSU. WSU will finish lower in the division standings than Stanford. Stanford's loss is worse. This is stupid. It's hard:Stanford 7-2Washington 7-2Washington State 6-3 South division games don't matter. Like I said both teams have one North division loss. Head-to-head tie breaker is stupid. So Stanford could have beaten WSU but lost to Oregon State one of the worst teams in the country but as long as they beat UW they're in. If you have two teams that are 4-1 you should judge them by their loss because that encapsulates the two team's performances against the entire division instead of their performance in just one division game.
Seriously annoying we can't clinch the North after this epic ass kicking. UW, Stanford, and WSU all have a loss to a North division opponent. So the North champion should be the team that lost to the highest ranked North team in the final standings which would be UW. So what the fuck? UW lost to Stanford but Stanford lost to WSU. WSU will finish lower in the division standings than Stanford. Stanford's loss is worse. This is stupid. It's hard:Stanford 7-2Washington 7-2Washington State 6-3
Seriously annoying we can't clinch the North after this epic ass kicking. UW, Stanford, and WSU all have a loss to a North division opponent. So the North champion should be the team that lost to the highest ranked North team in the final standings which would be UW. So what the fuck? UW lost to Stanford but Stanford lost to WSU. WSU will finish lower in the division standings than Stanford. Stanford's loss is worse. This is stupid.
That's what Leach gets for eating a banana at mid field....
Solid dose of Ahmed! I like...
The cougs suck You are right, but you're a major faggot
Talking about Bamas weak schedule......love it.....SEC..SEC...SEC...FY and ME
I'm confused Rod and Mark said thats a TUFF Colorado State team.
