Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Fire Jonathan Smith
Comments
-
Pettis is a downfield WR. He’s good at going up and getting the ball. He’s a long strider too. He’s good once he gets going.Tequilla said:The most unexplainable play call of the game was running the Ahmed reverse play w Pettis instead of Ahmed and not running the play until down 16 ... that was just terrible
He can make a guy miss and does frequently on punt returns, but even on those normally he gets a block or two, makes a guy or two miss, and houses it. -
That play, with that player, is all you need to see from Smiff. He doesn't coach to his offensive talent, especially in the passing game, but also in most of the run game.RoadDawg55 said:
Pettis is a downfield WR. He’s good at going up and getting the ball. He’s a long strider too. He’s good once he gets going.Tequilla said:The most unexplainable play call of the game was running the Ahmed reverse play w Pettis instead of Ahmed and not running the play until down 16 ... that was just terrible
He can make a guy miss and does frequently on punt returns, but even on those normally he gets a block or two, makes a guy or two miss, and houses it.
And what was with 4 or 5 counter plays when Stanford had massive penetration into the backfield each time? It's almost as if Smiff doesn't realize teams adjust and the same play won't work every time. -
Never fucking mind.
Fuck.
-
It’s a desperation play call called because he doesn’t trust his QB in the passing game ... a QB that he is responsible for coachingTurdBuffer said:
That play, with that player, is all you need to see from Smiff. He doesn't coach to his offensive talent, especially in the passing game, but also in most of the run game.RoadDawg55 said:
Pettis is a downfield WR. He’s good at going up and getting the ball. He’s a long strider too. He’s good once he gets going.Tequilla said:The most unexplainable play call of the game was running the Ahmed reverse play w Pettis instead of Ahmed and not running the play until down 16 ... that was just terrible
He can make a guy miss and does frequently on punt returns, but even on those normally he gets a block or two, makes a guy or two miss, and houses it.
And what was with 4 or 5 counter plays when Stanford had massive penetration into the backfield each time? It's almost as if Smiff doesn't realize teams adjust and the same play won't work every time. -
A) he doesn't put his QB in the best places to succeed (Play action)Tequilla said:
It’s a desperation play call called because he doesn’t trust his QB in the passing game ... a QB that he is responsible for coachingTurdBuffer said:
That play, with that player, is all you need to see from Smiff. He doesn't coach to his offensive talent, especially in the passing game, but also in most of the run game.RoadDawg55 said:
Pettis is a downfield WR. He’s good at going up and getting the ball. He’s a long strider too. He’s good once he gets going.Tequilla said:The most unexplainable play call of the game was running the Ahmed reverse play w Pettis instead of Ahmed and not running the play until down 16 ... that was just terrible
He can make a guy miss and does frequently on punt returns, but even on those normally he gets a block or two, makes a guy or two miss, and houses it.
And what was with 4 or 5 counter plays when Stanford had massive penetration into the backfield each time? It's almost as if Smiff doesn't realize teams adjust and the same play won't work every time.
his head coach told the world after Montana Jake was sneaky good on scrambles. Sadly Jake listened and thinks he's Russell Wilson/Fran Tarkington
C) Savon had two touches??????? This goes back to not having an identity on offense so when it gets tough, we don't have any go to bread and butter plays.
