Wilner Picking Trees this week
Logo
The Huskies are on a short week, looked wobbly the last time they were on the road and are losing playmakers seemingly by the day (the latest: receiver Quinten Pounds and tight end Hunter Bryant).
The Cardinal has played well at home, owns loads of big game experience and has a defense that’s just good enough to provide resistance.
Yep, the Huskies are granite.
Yep, the Cardinal looks lost.
But Stanford has options in the passing game and coach David Shaw, stung by the flatline in Pullman, will make a point of calling plays for his tight ends. (Their size will be problematic for UW.)
Quarterback K.J. Costello is mobile enough to elude the pass rush and should complete just enough third-down passes to keep drives alive.
Bryce Love will squeeze through just enough openings for the Cardinal to muster a few touchdowns.
Meanwhile, UW’s offense will encounter problems similar to those it encountered at Arizona State, where the running game sputtered, the protection broke down and there simply weren’t enough options for Jake Browning in the passing game.
If Washington scores touchdowns on defense or special teams (Dante Pettis), the calculation would change.
But Stanford should be sound enough to avoid breakdowns and turnovers.
The line is only six, folks. A Cardinal victory would hardly be a shocker.
http://www.mercurynews.com/2017/11/09/picks-of-the-week-stanford-beats-washington-ucla-and-utah-protect-their-home-turf-usc-fends-off-colorado/
Comments
-
CHRYST! Wilner sucks.
The Huskies OC looked wobbly the last time they were on the road. The running game sputtered, because Pete and Smiff weren't "stubborn" with it. I hate when Pete uses that word.
I'd like to see Love squeeze through the Husky defensive front.
I wish Shaw's Island of Misfit Toys at QB much luck. -
I figured Stanford would have their QB spot ironed out by now. Switching starters in week 10 is a shit show.
UW would have to really block cock lose this one in front of 10 people. -
What happened to Stanford murdering UW?Mosster47 said:I figured Stanford would have their QB spot ironed out by now. Switching starters in week 10 is a shit show.
UW would have to really block cock lose this one in front of 10 people. -
Wilner picking UW to lose? Big shocker
-
I love Wilners reasoning behind the Stanford pick. Even though there passing game is horrible they have options to beat the best defense in the Pac 12.
-
Hey babushka has been known to do thatMosster47 said:I figured Stanford would have their QB spot ironed out by now. Switching starters in week 10 is a shit show.
UW would have to really block cock lose this one in front of 10 people. -
disagree, he gets how online media works 'these days.'PurpleBaze said:CHRYST! Wilner sucks.
The Huskies OC looked wobbly the last time they were on the road. The running game sputtered, because Pete and Smiff weren't "stubborn" with it. I hate when Pete uses that word.
I'd like to see Love squeeze through the Husky defensive front.
I wish Shaw's Island of Misfit Toys at QB much luck.
obvious wilner troll is obvious. -
CuntWaffle said:
I love Wilners reasoning behind the Stanford pick. Even though there passing game is horrible they have options to beat the best defense
in the Pac 12outside of Tuscaloosa. -
He foregot to mention furd's devastating home field crowd advantage
-
I'm nervous as hell about this game, because if we do lose it's pretty much TSIO- i.e., Alamo or Holiday Bowl most likely. But unless we choke it away (totally within the realm of possibility) I just can't see how Stanford should win this game. We just have to find a way to get to 21 or more points.







