Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Donna Brazile: and the hits just keep on coming

1234689

Comments

  • doogie
    doogie Member Posts: 15,072
    sure.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,498 Standard Supporter
    Fuck. I read the thread title as Donna Brazile: and the tits just keep on coming.

    Very disappointed in content.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Gwad
    Gwad Member Posts: 2,855
    I don't live in the Puget Sound. Anyways your argument about coal is based on some false notion that energy independence can only be derived from coal. This is wrong. You're propensity to turn your 'factual' position into a focus on a person rather than the opposing position just shows how little you actually know. Whether or not someone is deriving their energy to shit show on the internet circumvents the original thread of discourse on how are you not a commie for wanting to subsidize coal?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Gwad
    Gwad Member Posts: 2,855
    Do you even want to subsidize coal? Was this a position you attained from your own independent research in the hopes of contributing to society? Is it just a talking point that you are defending to keep congruence with a story you chose of who you are and what you stand for? Have you questioned this position truthfully and honestly?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,447 Founders Club
    Gwad said:

    Hydroelectric. You're limping and my mouth is full of saliva.

    Why are we tearing down dams?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • doogie
    doogie Member Posts: 15,072
    Gwad said:

    I don't live in the Puget Sound. Anyways your argument about coal is based on some false notion that energy independence can only be derived from coal. This is wrong. You're propensity to turn your 'factual' position into a focus on a person rather than the opposing position just shows how little you actually know. Whether or not someone is deriving their energy to shit show on the internet circumvents the original thread of discourse on how are you not a commie for wanting to subsidize coal?

    You should try putting this post in the thread where it belongs.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • doogie
    doogie Member Posts: 15,072
    RaceBannon said:

    Gwad said:

    Hydroelectric. You're limping and my mouth is full of saliva.

    Why are we tearing down dams?
    Create beautiful habitat for Urban hikers to drive to and become one with nature, duh.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Gwad
    Gwad Member Posts: 2,855
    RaceBannon said:

    Gwad said:

    Hydroelectric. You're limping and my mouth is full of saliva.

    Why are we tearing down dams?
    I would assume for the same reasons the notion of turning away from coal arises. It fucks shit up.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • doogie
    doogie Member Posts: 15,072
    Gwad said:

    Do you even want to subsidize coal? Was this a position you attained from your own independent research in the hopes of contributing to society? Is it just a talking point that you are defending to keep congruence with a story you chose of who you are and what you stand for? Have you questioned this position truthfully and honestly?

    Obviously, you’ve done no research independent or otherwise.

    Btw, Thank you for your service. Your contributions here to society are special.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter