Looks like we win rather easily, say 35- 17
Comments
-
This is what you should be asking if Kim had said something factual and insightful. The bolded sentence is actually what confirms it to be a real.AIRWOLF said:
That can't be real. Can it?YellowSnow said:And apparently CU never came out and scored on their first drive against us
Kim Grinolds - CEO (6-0)
This could possibly be the first time Washington trails on the scoreboard since Rutgers. It will be interesting to see how they handle it. I expect a close game until midway third and then UW will close the game out after wearing ASU down in the desert.
PREDICTION: Washington 35-17 -
Nobody reads his stuff for football insight. It's all about the prose; he's a technically gifted writer.Pitchfork51 said:Fetters had a q and a on the asu board but honestly it was so generic and meaningless that it isn't interesting enough to make fun of.
Apparently to win we have to score and limit your offense while winning the turnover battle. -
Jesus. What a fucking retard.Pitchfork51 said:Fetters had a q and a on the asu board but honestly it was so generic and meaningless that it isn't interesting enough to make fun of.
Apparently to win we have to score and limit your offense while winning the turnover battle. -
People only read Kim's stuff for the expert wine recommendations.AIRWOLF said:
Nobody reads his stuff for football insight. It's all about the prose; he's a technically gifted writer.Pitchfork51 said:Fetters had a q and a on the asu board but honestly it was so generic and meaningless that it isn't interesting enough to make fun of.
Apparently to win we have to score and limit your offense while winning the turnover battle.
