PM to the Cuog (Classy Poast Warning)
Comments
-
Your season was over in August.
HTH -
It was officially over when Chip left. HTH.HuskyJW said:Your season was over in August.
HTH -
Not quite Nebraska classy
-
WSU isn't legit
-
Once Falk figures out the zone read this thing will get ugly quick.RaceBannon said:WSU isn't legit
-
It's not over for #thezone
-
WSU actually sucks. They have just played shittier teams so far. HTH.
-
USC is shitty. Ok doog. WSU is good this year whether you want to admit it or not. They'll give you a run for your money and might even win.CuntWaffle said:WSU actually sucks. They have just played shittier teams so far. HTH.
-
They will give us a run for our? Money like Sark have Chip a run for his. About a quarter and a half.oregonblitzkrieg said:
USC is shitty. Ok doog. WSU is good this year whether you want to admit it or not. They'll give you a run for your money and might even win.CuntWaffle said:WSU actually sucks. They have just played shittier teams so far. HTH.
-
oregonblitzkrieg said:
USC is shitty. Ok doog. WSU is good this year whether you want to admit it or not. They'll give you a run for your money and might even win.CuntWaffle said:WSU actually sucks. They have just played shittier teams so far. HTH.
-
WSU can't be expected to beat UW when they're missing their best white player (Pelluer). UW wins rather easily, say 42 - 17?oregonblitzkrieg said:
USC is shitty. Ok doog. WSU is good this year whether you want to admit it or not. They'll give you a run for your money and might even win.CuntWaffle said:WSU actually sucks. They have just played shittier teams so far. HTH.
-
You're such a butthole.oregonblitzkrieg said:
USC is shitty. Ok doog. WSU is good this year whether you want to admit it or not. They'll give you a run for your money and might even win.CuntWaffle said:WSU actually sucks. They have just played shittier teams so far. HTH.
-
Huh???CuntWaffle said:WSU actually sucks. TThey have just played shittier teams so far. HTH.
-
By why is your fan base retarded and deserves another doog-raping?salemcoog said:
Huh???CuntWaffle said:WSU actually sucks. TThey have just played shittier teams so far. HTH.
-
IT's OK MR chronically triggered by one word, until we beat UW, you're better. But I don't get the WSU has played shittier teams so far comment. Because it's not true.
-
Ummm... Thanks???oregonblitzkrieg said:Good gheym. Looks like you're legit this year. This loss didn't hurt as bad, since it's the 2nd one and the season is officially over until next year. Helps to be on the beach and not give a fuck about anything but swimming 5 hours a day. Beat UW, nothing else matters. And get your asses to the playoffs so you can get skull fucked by Bama or Auburn.
But we're not going the CFP playoff this year.
Besides, UW has the market cornered on getting skull fucked by the SEC in the CFP. -
This may be your one shot in 50 years. Cuogs need to get it done now or forget about it in your lifetime.salemcoog said:
Ummm... Thanks???oregonblitzkrieg said:Good gheym. Looks like you're legit this year. This loss didn't hurt as bad, since it's the 2nd one and the season is officially over until next year. Helps to be on the beach and not give a fuck about anything but swimming 5 hours a day. Beat UW, nothing else matters. And get your asses to the playoffs so you can get skull fucked by Bama or Auburn.
But we're not going the CFP playoff this year.
Besides, UW has the market cornered on getting skull fucked by the SEC in the CFP. -
They mean that WSU hasn't played the meat of their schedule yet, same as UW. Of course you haven't played shittier teams.salemcoog said:IT's OK MR chronically triggered by one word, until we beat UW, you're better. But I don't get the WSU has played shittier teams so far comment. Because it's not true.
-
Beating USC at home is quality meat IMO.haie said:
They mean that WSU hasn't played the meat of their schedule yet, same as UW. Of course you haven't played shittier teams.salemcoog said:IT's OK MR chronically triggered by one word, until we beat UW, you're better. But I don't get the WSU has played shittier teams so far comment. Because it's not true.
-
Stop and get on board with the narrative. If UW wins or loses against USC, USC is still great. If WSU beats USC, they are a bottom feeder of College Football.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Beating USC at home is quality meat IMO.haie said:
They mean that WSU hasn't played the meat of their schedule yet, same as UW. Of course you haven't played shittier teams.salemcoog said:IT's OK MR chronically triggered by one word, until we beat UW, you're better. But I don't get the WSU has played shittier teams so far comment. Because it's not true.
-
This wasn't last year's USC.salemcoog said:
Stop and get on board with the narrative. If UW wins or loses against USC, USC is still great. If WSU beats USC, they are a bottom feeder of College Football.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Beating USC at home is quality meat IMO.haie said:
They mean that WSU hasn't played the meat of their schedule yet, same as UW. Of course you haven't played shittier teams.salemcoog said:IT's OK MR chronically triggered by one word, until we beat UW, you're better. But I don't get the WSU has played shittier teams so far comment. Because it's not true.
tee hee hee -
Hi. We've been saying USC sucks all year.salemcoog said:
Stop and get on board with the narrative. If UW wins or loses against USC, USC is still great. If WSU beats USC, they are a bottom feeder of College Football.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Beating USC at home is quality meat IMO.haie said:
They mean that WSU hasn't played the meat of their schedule yet, same as UW. Of course you haven't played shittier teams.salemcoog said:IT's OK MR chronically triggered by one word, until we beat UW, you're better. But I don't get the WSU has played shittier teams so far comment. Because it's not true.
-
If you think SC is the same team as last year you belong at cougcenter. Look at every one of their games this year, especially against Cal and Wherever-the-fuck Michigan, and tell me it's the same team that goes up and beats a playoff team in their own stadium with that defense bearing down on you. Their win against Stanford, who then lost to SDSU, would be your only supporting evidence.salemcoog said:
Stop and get on board with the narrative. If UW wins or loses against USC, USC is still great. If WSU beats USC, they are a bottom feeder of College Football.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Beating USC at home is quality meat IMO.haie said:
They mean that WSU hasn't played the meat of their schedule yet, same as UW. Of course you haven't played shittier teams.salemcoog said:IT's OK MR chronically triggered by one word, until we beat UW, you're better. But I don't get the WSU has played shittier teams so far comment. Because it's not true.
Their rb busts an 80 yard run on you and doesn't touch the ball after that.
Cuogs gonna Cupg -
Definitely not saying WSU has played shittier teams than UW. Just shittier teams than themselves.
-
Maybe YOU have. But the doog quotient on these boreds is through the Roof!TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Hi. We've been saying USC sucks all year.salemcoog said:
Stop and get on board with the narrative. If UW wins or loses against USC, USC is still great. If WSU beats USC, they are a bottom feeder of College Football.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Beating USC at home is quality meat IMO.haie said:
They mean that WSU hasn't played the meat of their schedule yet, same as UW. Of course you haven't played shittier teams.salemcoog said:IT's OK MR chronically triggered by one word, until we beat UW, you're better. But I don't get the WSU has played shittier teams so far comment. Because it's not true.
-
I saw that. Nice try.haie said:
If you think SC is the same team as last year you belong at cougcenter. Look at every one of their games this year, especially against Cal and Wherever-the-fuck Michigan, and tell me it's the same team that goes up and beats a playoff team in their own stadium with that defense bearing down on you. Their win against Stanford, who then lost to SDSU, would be your only supporting evidence.salemcoog said:
Stop and get on board with the narrative. If UW wins or loses against USC, USC is still great. If WSU beats USC, they are a bottom feeder of College Football.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Beating USC at home is quality meat IMO.haie said:
They mean that WSU hasn't played the meat of their schedule yet, same as UW. Of course you haven't played shittier teams.salemcoog said:IT's OK MR chronically triggered by one word, until we beat UW, you're better. But I don't get the WSU has played shittier teams so far comment. Because it's not true.
Their rb busts an 80 yard run on you and doesn't touch the ball after that.
Cuogs gonna Cupg
But first: Your? QB ABSOLUTELY SHIT THE BED, and was tackled by his shoe laces and the turf as often as by an SC D lineman. It had less to do with SC's greatness and more to do with Washington choking.
Playoff team? Playoff? Did you say "Playoff?" Face it: the doog narrative for so long with Oregon (which most years was a stretch) actually applied to the Pac last year. You? were a playoff team like Race's wife was admitted to Washington: grades/test scores 2%; affirmative action 98%.
Come on. There is no doogier doogy doog move than the "they were good when we beat 'em and suck when you do" line. Even when it's true, like probably this year, it's been so abused by this cohort of dip shits over the last 25 years that it's just off-limits to you? guys now. Can't use it.
Kewgs by 24; cook it. -
Holy fucking shit.creepycoug said:
I saw that. Nice try.haie said:
If you think SC is the same team as last year you belong at cougcenter. Look at every one of their games this year, especially against Cal and Wherever-the-fuck Michigan, and tell me it's the same team that goes up and beats a playoff team in their own stadium with that defense bearing down on you. Their win against Stanford, who then lost to SDSU, would be your only supporting evidence.salemcoog said:
Stop and get on board with the narrative. If UW wins or loses against USC, USC is still great. If WSU beats USC, they are a bottom feeder of College Football.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Beating USC at home is quality meat IMO.haie said:
They mean that WSU hasn't played the meat of their schedule yet, same as UW. Of course you haven't played shittier teams.salemcoog said:IT's OK MR chronically triggered by one word, until we beat UW, you're better. But I don't get the WSU has played shittier teams so far comment. Because it's not true.
Their rb busts an 80 yard run on you and doesn't touch the ball after that.
Cuogs gonna Cupg
But first: Your? QB ABSOLUTELY SHIT THE BED, and was tackled by his shoe laces and the turf as often as by an SC D lineman. It had less to do with SC's greatness and more to do with Washington choking.
Playoff team? Playoff? Did you say "Playoff?" Face it: the doog narrative for so long with Oregon (which most years was a stretch) actually applied to the Pac last year. You? were a playoff team like Race's wife was admitted to Washington: grades/test scores 2%; affirmative action 98%.
Come on. There is no doogier doogy doog move than the "they were good when we beat 'em and suck when you do" line. Even when it's true, like probably this year, it's been so abused by this cohort of dip shits over the last 25 years that it's just off-limits to you? guys now. Can't use it.
Kewgs by 24; cook it. -
Boobs is a huge fucking doog too, even though he's not a husky. He's packed up his belongs and life savings and went all in on UW bandwagon.AZDuck said:
Maybe YOU have. But the doog quotient on these boreds is through the Roof!TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Hi. We've been saying USC sucks all year.salemcoog said:
Stop and get on board with the narrative. If UW wins or loses against USC, USC is still great. If WSU beats USC, they are a bottom feeder of College Football.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Beating USC at home is quality meat IMO.haie said:
They mean that WSU hasn't played the meat of their schedule yet, same as UW. Of course you haven't played shittier teams.salemcoog said:IT's OK MR chronically triggered by one word, until we beat UW, you're better. But I don't get the WSU has played shittier teams so far comment. Because it's not true.
-
Kewgs by 27? I like it. Cook it.dflea said:
Holy fucking shit.creepycoug said:
I saw that. Nice try.haie said:
If you think SC is the same team as last year you belong at cougcenter. Look at every one of their games this year, especially against Cal and Wherever-the-fuck Michigan, and tell me it's the same team that goes up and beats a playoff team in their own stadium with that defense bearing down on you. Their win against Stanford, who then lost to SDSU, would be your only supporting evidence.salemcoog said:
Stop and get on board with the narrative. If UW wins or loses against USC, USC is still great. If WSU beats USC, they are a bottom feeder of College Football.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Beating USC at home is quality meat IMO.haie said:
They mean that WSU hasn't played the meat of their schedule yet, same as UW. Of course you haven't played shittier teams.salemcoog said:IT's OK MR chronically triggered by one word, until we beat UW, you're better. But I don't get the WSU has played shittier teams so far comment. Because it's not true.
Their rb busts an 80 yard run on you and doesn't touch the ball after that.
Cuogs gonna Cupg
But first: Your? QB ABSOLUTELY SHIT THE BED, and was tackled by his shoe laces and the turf as often as by an SC D lineman. It had less to do with SC's greatness and more to do with Washington choking.
Playoff team? Playoff? Did you say "Playoff?" Face it: the doog narrative for so long with Oregon (which most years was a stretch) actually applied to the Pac last year. You? were a playoff team like Race's wife was admitted to Washington: grades/test scores 2%; affirmative action 98%.
Come on. There is no doogier doogy doog move than the "they were good when we beat 'em and suck when you do" line. Even when it's true, like probably this year, it's been so abused by this cohort of dip shits over the last 25 years that it's just off-limits to you? guys now. Can't use it.
Kewgs by 24; cook it. -
Bump! LOL
