Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Wilner on a not so friendly part of the UW schedule
Comments
-
Sounds like he thinks WSU is a better team but UW will win because of HFA. Not an indefensible position in a vacuum. Just indefensible because WSU.YellowSnow said:
Perhaps. Wilner seems to have a funky logic in how he ranks teams- e.g., he picked UW to win the Pac (and still expects them do so) but still has Kewgs higher on his AP ballot. Basically, his ballot is not meant to be predictive of who would actually win head to head.PurpleThrobber said:Is Wilner trying to make up for his faggotry of last week?
-
dnc said:
Sounds like he thinks WSU is a better team but UW will win because of HFA. Not an indefensible position in a vacuum. Just indefensible because WSU.YellowSnow said:
Perhaps. Wilner seems to have a funky logic in how he ranks teams- e.g., he picked UW to win the Pac (and still expects them do so) but still has Kewgs higher on his AP ballot. Basically, his ballot is not meant to be predictive of who would actually win head to head.PurpleThrobber said:Is Wilner trying to make up for his faggotry of last week?
And also indefensible because wsu needed 3 ots to beat bsu at home -
That was implied under "indefensible because WSU."PostGameOrangeSlices said:dnc said:
Sounds like he thinks WSU is a better team but UW will win because of HFA. Not an indefensible position in a vacuum. Just indefensible because WSU.YellowSnow said:
Perhaps. Wilner seems to have a funky logic in how he ranks teams- e.g., he picked UW to win the Pac (and still expects them do so) but still has Kewgs higher on his AP ballot. Basically, his ballot is not meant to be predictive of who would actually win head to head.PurpleThrobber said:Is Wilner trying to make up for his faggotry of last week?
And also indefensible because wsu needed 3 ots to beat bsu at home
