Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Wilner on a not so friendly part of the UW schedule
YellowSnow
Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,271 
Number of times this season CFP contenders face and opponent coming off a BYE week.
Alabama: 1
Ohio State: 0
Florida State: 1
USC: 0
Clemson: 0
Penn State: 1
Oklahoma: 0
Washington: 3
Wisconsin: 1
Oklahoma State: 0
http://www.mercurynews.com/2017/10/09/the-pac-12-did-washington-no-favors-with-the-schedule-and-that-was-a-mistake-the-case-for-favoritism-part-ii/
Alabama: 1
Ohio State: 0
Florida State: 1
USC: 0
Clemson: 0
Penn State: 1
Oklahoma: 0
Washington: 3
Wisconsin: 1
Oklahoma State: 0
http://www.mercurynews.com/2017/10/09/the-pac-12-did-washington-no-favors-with-the-schedule-and-that-was-a-mistake-the-case-for-favoritism-part-ii/
Comments
-
You’re no Taft but thank you anyway.
-
That's a good thing. No one wants to be associated with Presidents that finish in 3rd place.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:You’re no Taft but thank you anyway.
-
We actually play 4 teams coming off of a bye... assuming USC wins the south
-
Uh, no. That's Stanford.NEsnake12 said:We actually play 4 teams coming off of a bye... assuming USC wins the south
-
Is Wilner trying to make up for his faggotry of last week?
-
Perhaps. Wilner seems to have a funky logic in how he ranks teams- e.g., he picked UW to win the Pac (and still expects them do so) but still has Kewgs higher on his AP ballot. Basically, his ballot is not meant to be predictive of who would actually win head to head.PurpleThrobber said:Is Wilner trying to make up for his faggotry of last week?
-
So he basically just spews faggotry. Got it.YellowSnow said:
Perhaps. Wilner seems to have a funky logic in how he ranks teams- e.g., he picked UW to win the Pac (and still expects them do so) but still has Kewgs higher on his AP ballot. Basically, his ballot is not meant to be predictive of who would actually win head to head.PurpleThrobber said:Is Wilner trying to make up for his faggotry of last week?
-
AP ballots are supposed to focus heavily on what had been done and not just prediction. I'm not saying his choice is logical in this case but the items aren't necessarily incompatible.YellowSnow said:
Perhaps. Wilner seems to have a funky logic in how he ranks teams- e.g., he picked UW to win the Pac (and still expects them do so) but still has Kewgs higher on his AP ballot. Basically, his ballot is not meant to be predictive of who would actually win head to head.PurpleThrobber said:Is Wilner trying to make up for his faggotry of last week?
-
SDSU already won the SouthNEsnake12 said:We actually play 4 teams coming off of a bye... assuming USC wins the south
-
NOC we'll stomp all these garbage teams.
-
Sounds like he thinks WSU is a better team but UW will win because of HFA. Not an indefensible position in a vacuum. Just indefensible because WSU.YellowSnow said:
Perhaps. Wilner seems to have a funky logic in how he ranks teams- e.g., he picked UW to win the Pac (and still expects them do so) but still has Kewgs higher on his AP ballot. Basically, his ballot is not meant to be predictive of who would actually win head to head.PurpleThrobber said:Is Wilner trying to make up for his faggotry of last week?
-
dnc said:
Sounds like he thinks WSU is a better team but UW will win because of HFA. Not an indefensible position in a vacuum. Just indefensible because WSU.YellowSnow said:
Perhaps. Wilner seems to have a funky logic in how he ranks teams- e.g., he picked UW to win the Pac (and still expects them do so) but still has Kewgs higher on his AP ballot. Basically, his ballot is not meant to be predictive of who would actually win head to head.PurpleThrobber said:Is Wilner trying to make up for his faggotry of last week?
And also indefensible because wsu needed 3 ots to beat bsu at home -
That was implied under "indefensible because WSU."PostGameOrangeSlices said:dnc said:
Sounds like he thinks WSU is a better team but UW will win because of HFA. Not an indefensible position in a vacuum. Just indefensible because WSU.YellowSnow said:
Perhaps. Wilner seems to have a funky logic in how he ranks teams- e.g., he picked UW to win the Pac (and still expects them do so) but still has Kewgs higher on his AP ballot. Basically, his ballot is not meant to be predictive of who would actually win head to head.PurpleThrobber said:Is Wilner trying to make up for his faggotry of last week?
And also indefensible because wsu needed 3 ots to beat bsu at home
