Oregon good but will never be great like Huskies were
Comments
-
The 1991 Huskies never had to face a Ranked Oregon State though..........
-
Poont.He_Needs_More_Time said:The 1991 Huskies never had to face a Ranked Oregon State though..........
It would be wrong of someone to poast a thread at that other place axing Fleenor if Oregon's a better team than 91 UW since they play in such a better conference.
-
I don't no why you axe me that question. 91 UW wasn't even bettuh than 91 Miami ... let's get royotis up in hee-uh.dnc said:
Poont.He_Needs_More_Time said:The 1991 Huskies never had to face a Ranked Oregon State though..........
It would be wrong of someone to poast a thread at that other place axing Fleenor if Oregon's a better team than 91 UW since they play in such a better conference.
1/2 a natty and a made up natty ... what da fuck we talkin' 'bout hee-uh?
-
Oregon's best team was in 2010. They didn't give up a point in the 4th quarter until like the 9th or 10th week. They had a kicker, they had two stud running backs, were loaded at WR and TE, and the line was very deep. Darron Thomas was the most clutch kid I've ever seen. The more you sent at him and the bigger the moment he just got better. If I'm remembering right every LB in the two deep was either first team All-Conference or an NFL pick.
The defense held Can Newton in check for four quarters. No way in hell a ball control offense scores 35 on that team, not in 8 quarters. The same way Fairley was a little too much to handle Empterman would have been the same way. That UW team could have beaten Oregon that year but it would have been low scoring and who knows what would have happened. I'd pay to see it, that's for sure. -
Why do you hate Dennis Dixon's hypothetical Heisman Natty combo?Mosster47 said:Oregon's best team was in 2010. They didn't give up a point in the 4th quarter until like the 9th or 10th week. They had a kicker, they had two stud running backs, were loaded at WR and TE, and the line was very deep. Darron Thomas was the most clutch kid I've ever seen. The more you sent at him and the bigger the moment he just got better. If I'm remembering right every LB in the two deep was either first team All-Conference or an NFL pick.
The defense held Can Newton in check for four quarters. No way in hell a ball control offense scores 35 on that team, not in 8 quarters. The same way Fairley was a little too much to handle Empterman would have been the same way. That UW team could have beaten Oregon that year but it would have been low scoring and who knows what would have happened. I'd pay to see it, that's for sure.
-
When DD was healthy the Ducks were the best team in the country that year and their offense was ridiculous. The defense wasn't all that great though. 2010 was the shark jump, so far.dnc said:
Why do you hate Dennis Dixon's hypothetical Heisman Natty combo?Mosster47 said:Oregon's best team was in 2010. They didn't give up a point in the 4th quarter until like the 9th or 10th week. They had a kicker, they had two stud running backs, were loaded at WR and TE, and the line was very deep. Darron Thomas was the most clutch kid I've ever seen. The more you sent at him and the bigger the moment he just got better. If I'm remembering right every LB in the two deep was either first team All-Conference or an NFL pick.
The defense held Can Newton in check for four quarters. No way in hell a ball control offense scores 35 on that team, not in 8 quarters. The same way Fairley was a little too much to handle Empterman would have been the same way. That UW team could have beaten Oregon that year but it would have been low scoring and who knows what would have happened. I'd pay to see it, that's for sure.
-
There is no discussing 91 Washington without royotis.
So just shut up until Roy shows.
Tnx
![[Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/b14605887e2b6b59902271a0095c9265_100.png)
