Which Doogism irks your ire the most?
Which Doogism irks your ire the most? 57 votes
![[Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/b14605887e2b6b59902271a0095c9265_100.png)
9 votes
9 votes
1 vote
![[Deleted User]](https://w0.vanillicon.com/0207c5b8d9863e3a221f61582bd6bfa3_100.png)
![[Deleted User]](https://wf.vanillicon.com/f554f53c1ce0fe601afe4046f290767c_100.png)
10 votes
3 votes
6 votes
3 votes
16 votes
Comments
-
the field
-
The Grinolds Groaner: state matter-of-factly that instate recruiting is fine despite face-slapping evidence to the contraryRecruiting ...
Simply b/c all you have to do is look at how far behind our OL/DL play is compared to the rest of the team and that's driven by the quality of recruiting in these areas wasn't good enough in the first 2-3 years of Sark's tenure and he's paying for it now -
The Section14A Slapper: extreme passive-aggressiveness. Has superiority complex despite having every reason to have inferiority complexSection14a and johnb
Abundance. -
The Grinolds Groaner: state matter-of-factly that instate recruiting is fine despite face-slapping evidence to the contraryFetters is a troll. He just likes to argue. Kim plugging his ears and closing his eyes is the worst. He acts like there are no problems.
-
The Fleenor Fallacy: minimize the great Don James' accomplishments in an attempt to prop up SarkisianFuck those are some tough choices there was like 3 I had it down to. The one I chose, Eklund trashing on players and MykFS since I wasted an entire night arguing with that cunt arguing that point.
However, the minimizing of Don James to prop up Sark is a new Doog low. They didn't even do that during the Ty era or even in Sark's first three years. I first started seeing it last year and now it's really been moved up.
Even how Kim and F3 acted about James death, Sark's bullshit at James memorial and Doogs acting like he was worse than he actually was really pisses me off.
This man was Husky football and was so respected by everyone in the nation. I can't truly describe how much the James bashing pisses me off. -
The Fleenor Fallacy: minimize the great Don James' accomplishments in an attempt to prop up Sarkisian
Hey Kim how is our OL holding up?RoadDawg55 said:Fetters is a troll. He just likes to argue. Kim plugging his ears and closing his eyes is the worst. He acts like there are no problems.
I also remember Kim and other Doogs saying "UW will win 10 games this year if Keith Price has a good year."
Well he hasn't thrown a pick since the Oregon game yet UW is 2-2 in the last four games. This year proved us all right and Kim wrong that Price isn't the problem.
He has a 19-4 TD-INT ratio yet the team is headed towards yet another underachieving season. -
The JonB Jackoff: a sycophant to the sycophants, firmly believe 7 wins in year 5 should be everyone's expectation, be aghast that people dare question authorityI agree with CollegeDoog (had to pick one so picked JohnB for his sneering contempt for anyone who challenges the conventional "wisdom").
Still, it's like picking the ugliest girl in a room full of ugly chicks...a race to the bottom:
-
The original post & options show an abundance of riches.
-
The JonB Jackoff: a sycophant to the sycophants, firmly believe 7 wins in year 5 should be everyone's expectation, be aghast that people dare question authorityYeah, really uncalled for and Dooging at its lowest...they aren't even right in the first place because DJ only played 11 regular season games and we didn't start playing 12 until 2003 or 2004.
Of course a few of the Doogs who want Sloppy Steve back are preemptively trumpeting 9 wins but who cares if SSWS gets there with 4 OOC wins, just a 5-4 conference record, and another 3rd or 4th place Pac-12 North Finish? Is Husky Football all about rearranging lowly Georgia State's face or still about competing for Pac-12 Championships?
It's like they can't see how a lame-duck coach returning (highly doubt Sloppy Steve wins out) will crush 2014 season ticket sales and all of the other life out of the program. No way he even wins 6 conference games next year with all of his growing warts and less returning starters, new Kicker / Punter, and a new QB.
To those guys on the list, Competitive Dooging isn't just a hobby, it's a way of life.He_Needs_More_Time said:Fuck those are some tough choices there was like 3 I had it down to. The one I chose, Eklund trashing on players and MykFS since I wasted an entire night arguing with that cunt arguing that point.
However, the minimizing of Don James to prop up Sark is a new Doog low. They didn't even do that during the Ty era or even in Sark's first three years. I first started seeing it last year and now it's really been moved up.
Even how Kim and F3 acted about James death, Sark's bullshit at James memorial and Doogs acting like he was worse than he actually was really pisses me off.
This man was Husky football and was so respected by everyone in the nation. I can't truly describe how much the James bashing pisses me off. -
What if you are a quook/coog troll that supports all of them?
-
The Grinolds Groaner: state matter-of-factly that instate recruiting is fine despite face-slapping evidence to the contrary
I had forgotten all about Kim and others saying this was a 10 win team if Price had a good season until Chest mentioned it on the podcast. Price has had a very good season, and we are still a 7-6 team. It doesn't matter who plays QB. Sark's always gonna Sark.He_Needs_More_Time said:
Hey Kim how is our OL holding up?RoadDawg55 said:Fetters is a troll. He just likes to argue. Kim plugging his ears and closing his eyes is the worst. He acts like there are no problems.
I also remember Kim and other Doogs saying "UW will win 10 games this year if Keith Price has a good year."
Well he hasn't thrown a pick since the Oregon game yet UW is 2-2 in the last four games. This year proved us all right and Kim wrong that Price isn't the problem.
He has a 19-4 TD-INT ratio yet the team is headed towards yet another underachieving season. -
The Fleenor Fallacy: minimize the great Don James' accomplishments in an attempt to prop up SarkisianThis is a really good poll. First poll on here I've actually struggled with making a choice.
I wonder if these Doogs know deep down inside after they press "submit" on their comment that they know they are full of shit.
No way these fucks can actually believe the crap they are writing. -
Brb. JOHFNY said:I agree with CollegeDoog (had to pick one so picked JohnB for his sneering contempt for anyone who challenges the conventional "wisdom").
Still, it's like picking the ugliest girl in a room full of ugly chicks...a race to the bottom: -
The Grinolds Groaner: state matter-of-factly that instate recruiting is fine despite face-slapping evidence to the contrary
It was hard to choose because The Field wasn't an option.He_Needs_More_Time said:This is a really good poll. First poll on here I've actually struggled with making a choice.
I wonder if these Doogs know deep down inside after they press "submit" on their comment that they know they are full of shit.
No way these fucks can actually believe the crap they are writing. -
The Eklund Emasculation: throw the players under the bus at every opportunity and never hold the multimillionaire coach responsibleThe The Eklund Emasculation bugs me because they are acknowledging that there IS a problem, but then push the blame around to everyone except the coach.
Why are they so protective of the guy who gets paid tons of money to do a job, but are quick to blame players, officials, or even assistants (who are under the direction of the head coach)? -
The MykFS Malaise: ignore glaring W-L statistics and cite obscure, irrelevant data to justify continued mediocrityI've been getting Myk's argument a lot regarding scoring more PPG against ranked opponents and other such metrics, while ignoring the win-loss record.
-
The Grinolds Groaner: state matter-of-factly that instate recruiting is fine despite face-slapping evidence to the contraryAll aspects of teen boy stalking discussion by SE, Fetters and especially Grinolds. Fetters and Ecklund constantly and unashamedly contradicting themselves on the topic is hard to stomach, but Grinolds takes the cake every time he opens his mouth. He says the same thing every time, which basically amounts to "shut the fuck up and stop thinking for yourselves. I'm telling you that everything is fine."
-
The Fleenor Fallacy: minimize the great Don James' accomplishments in an attempt to prop up Sarkisian
Yep. Madness.MelloDawg said:I've been getting Myk's argument a lot regarding scoring more PPG against ranked opponents and other such metrics, while ignoring the win-loss record.
-
The Section14A Slapper: extreme passive-aggressiveness. Has superiority complex despite having every reason to have inferiority complex
You just summed up Pool Boy's interview and hiring process perfectly.HFNY said:I agree with CollegeDoog (had to pick one so picked JohnB for his sneering contempt for anyone who challenges the conventional "wisdom").
Still, it's like picking the ugliest girl in a room full of ugly chicks...a race to the bottom:
-
The Eklund Emasculation: throw the players under the bus at every opportunity and never hold the multimillionaire coach responsibleTequilla said:
Recruiting ...
Simply b/c all you have to do is look at how far behind our OL/DL play is compared to the rest of the team and that's driven by the quality of recruiting in these areas wasn't good enough in the first 2-3 years of Sark's tenure and he's paying for it now
Amen and hallelujah -
The Fleenor Fallacy: minimize the great Don James' accomplishments in an attempt to prop up Sarkisian
Disagree he covered the main ones. What would have made it easy is if he had an "All of the above".CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
It was hard to choose because The Field wasn't an option.He_Needs_More_Time said:This is a really good poll. First poll on here I've actually struggled with making a choice.
I wonder if these Doogs know deep down inside after they press "submit" on their comment that they know they are full of shit.
No way these fucks can actually believe the crap they are writing. -
The Eklund Emasculation: throw the players under the bus at every opportunity and never hold the multimillionaire coach responsibleGreat poll.
Not to go all NupeDawg all over the place, but my vote comes down to my belief that anyone that throws 18-22 year old students under the bus to prop up POS multimillionaire coaches needs to DIAFF. -
The JonB Jackoff: a sycophant to the sycophants, firmly believe 7 wins in year 5 should be everyone's expectation, be aghast that people dare question authorityDIAFF slowly, wearing nothing but a gas mask so that they feel the burn of the flames rather than smoke inhalation getting them first.
KP is so much mentally and physically tougher than all of the Doogs who try to diminish him (or Don James) to prop up He Who Bangs Joey's & Hair Dressing Chicks.
What in god's hell is going on?!? I almost can't take it anymore but instead of squatting on the sidelines and looking like an idiot deer in the headlights, I will battle on like Keith Price.WedgwoodDawg said:Great poll.
Not to go all NupeDawg all over the place, but my vote comes down to my belief that anyone that throws 18-22 year old students under the bus to prop up POS multimillionaire coaches needs to DIAFF. -
The Grinolds Groaner: state matter-of-factly that instate recruiting is fine despite face-slapping evidence to the contraryGreat fucking pole
Got to be the recruiting especially given they get to skew the ratings too -
The Fleenor Fallacy: minimize the great Don James' accomplishments in an attempt to prop up SarkisianDeserves a bump.
Lather, rinse, repeat. -
The Section14A Slapper: extreme passive-aggressiveness. Has superiority complex despite having every reason to have inferiority complexMy personal fave is the annual:
"Oregon lost (insert whatever you want here) from last year and the Dawgs are (insert whatever you want here) than last season. I think the streak ends this year."
Then what everyone expects to happen, happens. -
The Grinolds Groaner: state matter-of-factly that instate recruiting is fine despite face-slapping evidence to the contrary
Shit, that's happening now.Mosster47 said:My personal fave is the annual:
"Oregon lost (insert whatever you want here) from last year and the Dawgs are (insert whatever you want here) than last season. I think the streak ends this year."
Then what everyone expects to happen, happens. -
The Fleenor Fallacy: minimize the great Don James' accomplishments in an attempt to prop up SarkisianNext year will be special. If not next year, then the year after next. @puppylove_sugarsteelCFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
Shit, that's happening now.Mosster47 said:My personal fave is the annual:
"Oregon lost (insert whatever you want here) from last year and the Dawgs are (insert whatever you want here) than last season. I think the streak ends this year."
Then what everyone expects to happen, happens. -
The Section14A Slapper: extreme passive-aggressiveness. Has superiority complex despite having every reason to have inferiority complex-No tourney in 5 years? Yea, but, Romar created an NBA factory.
-The passsive aggressive Petersen apologists (punt on Ducks 39, 92-10 but under .500 P12 play, Lindy dreck package, J Smith retained in year 3, etc.).
-Cant expect to win with a team this young. (Gilby, Sark, Petersen, Romar)
-Jen Cohen is a GREAT hire.
