Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Facts

13»

Comments

  • SpoonieLuv
    SpoonieLuv Member Posts: 5,470
    If people can't grasp the concept of 0.500 I doubt lists of numbers are going to help. It's like trying to explain the difference between a violin and a fiddle to a horse that had been kicked int the head by another horse.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • WazzusJobu
    WazzusJobu Member Posts: 45
    DoogieMcDoogerson said:

    FACTS

    Inability to Win on the Road
    2009: 0-5 on the road
    2010: 3-3 on the road
    2011: 1-4 on the road
    2012: 2-4 on the road
    2013: 1-3 so far
    Combined record: 7-19 on the road

    Huge Blowout losses each year
    2009 - 43-19 loss to Oregon
    2009 - 48-21 loss to Oregon State
    2010 - 56-21 loss to Nebraska
    2010 - 44-14 loss to Arizona
    2010 - 41-0 to Stanford
    2010 - 53-16 loss to Oregon
    2011 - 51-38 loss to Nebraska
    2011 - 65-21 loss to Stanford
    2011 - 40-17 loss to USC
    2012 - 41-3 loss to LSU
    2012 - 52-21 loss to Oregon
    2012 - 52-17 loss to Arizona
    2013 - 45-24 loss to Oregon
    2013 - 53-24 loss to Arizona State

    A 3 or more game losing streak in the pac-12 every year
    2009 - 4 games ( ASU, Oregon, UCLA, Oregon State )
    2010 - 3 games ( ASU, Stanford, Oregon )
    2011 - 3 games ( Oregon, USC, Oregon State )
    2012 - 3 games ( Oregon, USC, Arizona )
    2013 - 3 games ( Stanford, Oregon, Arizona State )

    Average and not improving pac-12 record every year
    2009 - 4 wins, 5 losses
    2010 - 5 wins, 4 losses
    2011 - 5 wins, 4 losses
    2012 - 5 wins, 4 losses
    2013 - 3 wins, 4 losses so far

    Record versus ranked opponents
    2009 - 2-3
    2010 - 3-4
    2011 - 0-4
    2012 - 2-4
    2013 - 1-3
    overall 8-18

    Record versus the NW
    1-2
    2-1
    1-2
    1-2
    0-1 so far
    5-7 record overall

    Record versus Oregon
    0-5

    Could we really do worse with a coaching change?

    Blah, Blah, Blah, the facts are he's doing it the right way.


    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HFNY
    HFNY Member Posts: 5,645
    Can't blame you...looks like Wisconsin made a great hire in Gary Anderson while the Doogiest of Doogs are worried that if we drop the ugly chick we have, we'll end up with a heinous chick. I just can't understand that defeatist thinking...is that the philosophy of a winner? I wonder what this great human being would tell them if he was still alive

    image
    Mad_Son said:

    Fact: I gave a few hundred dollars to Wisconsin (my other alma mater) today and none to Washington. That is much more meaningful than any football related statistic I could dig up.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • death2ducks
    death2ducks Member Posts: 991
    WDWHA said:

    I prefer to look at so-called ranked opponents differently. To me, I don't give a shit if Boise State was ranked because of some preseason bullshit. Or put it this way: should ASU get extra credit for beating us because we were mistakenly ranked? By the end of the year the polls reflect who you actually are. With that in mind, I come up with:

    2009 0-3
    2010 1-3
    2011 0-5
    2012 2-3
    2013 0-4 (BSU won't make the final poll but I think ASU will)

    So I get 3-18. Breaking those numbers down further:

    - 9 of those games were away. We have lost all 9 by an average of 25 points (47-22).
    - 9 of those are home games. We have lost 7 of them. In total, the average score of those games is 17 (UW) -32 (Opponents).
    - The 3 neutral games (all bowls) shows an amazing Don James-like trait. We are 1-2 but have been outscored by only 1 point total (102-101).
    - Overall, we are outscored by 17 points in games against teams that end up ranked. The average score for us losing is 39-22.

    You need to post this on the Seattle Times comments to the Larry Stone article.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter