Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

The fucktard discussion is not just on ****man.com

Houhusky
Houhusky Member Posts: 5,537
edited November 2013 in Hardcore Husky Board
http://www.reddit.com/r/huskies/comments/1qx193/sarkfacts/

check out the reused doog arguments over on reddit, We also get some FREE PUB from doog favorite supercanuck
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«134

Comments

  • HFNY
    HFNY Member Posts: 5,587
    I see the Duchess of Doogs, "supercanuck" made his way onto the Reddit conversation. Man, SSWS must have pictures of supercanuck doing snuff porn or something...his devotion to his dear leader just doesn't make any sense.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MadHusky
    MadHusky Member Posts: 376
    The season is not over. If we win the rest of the games and win the bowl game. People will be quiet about it.
    Sark has been a tremendous recruiter. Sure, his play-calling and game management are suspect at times but unless people have better candidates then there's no point of talking about it.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    spoooooooooooky said:

    I don't think that even winning the rest of our games (and going 5-4 again) will be enough to satisfy most fans.
    Yeah, Sark's recruiting on both lines has really been impressive... (/sarcasm)

    kingwhipsy said:

    Are you a Ducks fan?

    LOL
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • jecornel
    jecornel Member Posts: 9,737
    majority of doog nation wanted Cyler as the starter in August.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    monroecougdad said:

    Christ...

    But record is such a terrible way of judging how good a team is. Let's say a week ago I said that Keith Price would have been out for half of the UCLA game, and I asked the people in this thread to set a spread on the game. Even as homers I don't think we would see an average spread of less than 5 or 6.
    So Washington performed 4-5 points worse than expected. Why does that cause such an uproar? Washington performed as expected, or at least reasonably close to it. Having people make passive-aggressive posts like this is only showing how emotional people are getting about this which IMO is not a good way to make coaching decisions.

    Fag

    Sounds like that moron Myk who refuses to aknowledge W-L and always tries to bring up obscure stats to show that Sark is better than his average record indicates.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • doogsinparadise
    doogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320
    "You know, I tried writing a constructive and well written comment to defend Sark but I'm done wasting my breath. If the Sark haters want him gone so bad, then so be it. I don't think people on that train realize what firing a coach does to a team. Whatever happens, happens. Good luck to this sub, I'm out. Seriously depressing." -- thatonekidunusual

    This has to be a whoosh, If you're going to bash losing, than I'm out style
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • doogsinparadise
    doogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320
    HFNY said:

    I see the Duchess of Doogs, "supercanuck" made his way onto the Reddit conversation. Man, SSWS must have pictures of supercanuck doing snuff porn or something...his devotion to his dear leader just doesn't make any sense.

    "Some of us feel like Sarkisian over achieved in '09 and '10 and is under-achieving in '12 and '13." -supercanuck

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MelloDawg
    MelloDawg Member Posts: 6,917
    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    monroecougdad said:

    Christ...

    But record is such a terrible way of judging how good a team is. Let's say a week ago I said that Keith Price would have been out for half of the UCLA game, and I asked the people in this thread to set a spread on the game. Even as homers I don't think we would see an average spread of less than 5 or 6.
    So Washington performed 4-5 points worse than expected. Why does that cause such an uproar? Washington performed as expected, or at least reasonably close to it. Having people make passive-aggressive posts like this is only showing how emotional people are getting about this which IMO is not a good way to make coaching decisions.

    Fag

    Sounds like that moron Myk who refuses to aknowledge W-L and always tries to bring up obscure stats to show that Sark is better than his average record indicates.
    If you would like obscure facts, we now are using PPG against ranked opponents to find a silver lining around the shitcloud of a season we're having, Softy's minon RBC says so. I hear we're doing well with that advanced metric.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    MelloDawg said:

    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    monroecougdad said:

    Christ...

    But record is such a terrible way of judging how good a team is. Let's say a week ago I said that Keith Price would have been out for half of the UCLA game, and I asked the people in this thread to set a spread on the game. Even as homers I don't think we would see an average spread of less than 5 or 6.
    So Washington performed 4-5 points worse than expected. Why does that cause such an uproar? Washington performed as expected, or at least reasonably close to it. Having people make passive-aggressive posts like this is only showing how emotional people are getting about this which IMO is not a good way to make coaching decisions.

    Fag

    Sounds like that moron Myk who refuses to aknowledge W-L and always tries to bring up obscure stats to show that Sark is better than his average record indicates.
    If you would like obscure facts, we now are using PPG against ranked opponents to find a silver lining around the shitcloud of a season we're having, Softy's minon RBC says so. I hear we're doing well with that advanced metric.
    At least the Doogman Doogs are idiots but the Softy Doogs are the white trash element of our fan base that I really hate.

    End of the day we are 0-4 against current ranked opponents. I'm sure RBC is excluding ASU and including Boise bc Doogs love to skew facts.

    Also I don't want to hear about point differential as Sark benefited from luck the previous three seasons where his expected W-L was worse than his actual W-L meaning he got lucky.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    supercanuck said:

    Makes perfect sense if you're capable of interpreting FEI, F/+ or SRS.

    I'll leave you to it ladies. ;-)

    I heard this is the place to get my racism and porn fix.. amirite?

    So you agree with us that Sark should have been fired in 2011.

    Welcome to the board and LEAVE!

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter