Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Facts
DoogieMcDoogerson
Member Posts: 2,530
FACTS
Inability to Win on the Road
2009: 0-5 on the road
2010: 3-3 on the road
2011: 1-4 on the road
2012: 2-4 on the road
2013: 1-3 so far
Combined record: 7-19 on the road
Huge Blowout losses each year
2009 - 43-19 loss to Oregon
2009 - 48-21 loss to Oregon State
2010 - 56-21 loss to Nebraska
2010 - 44-14 loss to Arizona
2010 - 41-0 to Stanford
2010 - 53-16 loss to Oregon
2011 - 51-38 loss to Nebraska
2011 - 65-21 loss to Stanford
2011 - 40-17 loss to USC
2012 - 41-3 loss to LSU
2012 - 52-21 loss to Oregon
2012 - 52-17 loss to Arizona
2013 - 45-24 loss to Oregon
2013 - 53-24 loss to Arizona State
A 3 or more game losing streak in the pac-12 every year
2009 - 4 games ( ASU, Oregon, UCLA, Oregon State )
2010 - 3 games ( ASU, Stanford, Oregon )
2011 - 3 games ( Oregon, USC, Oregon State )
2012 - 3 games ( Oregon, USC, Arizona )
2013 - 3 games ( Stanford, Oregon, Arizona State )
Average and not improving pac-12 record every year
2009 - 4 wins, 5 losses
2010 - 5 wins, 4 losses
2011 - 5 wins, 4 losses
2012 - 5 wins, 4 losses
2013 - 3 wins, 4 losses so far
Record versus ranked opponents
2009 - 2-3
2010 - 3-4
2011 - 0-4
2012 - 2-4
2013 - 1-3
overall 8-18
Record versus the NW
1-2
2-1
1-2
1-2
0-1 so far
5-7 record overall
Record versus Oregon
0-5
Could we really do worse with a coaching change?
Inability to Win on the Road
2009: 0-5 on the road
2010: 3-3 on the road
2011: 1-4 on the road
2012: 2-4 on the road
2013: 1-3 so far
Combined record: 7-19 on the road
Huge Blowout losses each year
2009 - 43-19 loss to Oregon
2009 - 48-21 loss to Oregon State
2010 - 56-21 loss to Nebraska
2010 - 44-14 loss to Arizona
2010 - 41-0 to Stanford
2010 - 53-16 loss to Oregon
2011 - 51-38 loss to Nebraska
2011 - 65-21 loss to Stanford
2011 - 40-17 loss to USC
2012 - 41-3 loss to LSU
2012 - 52-21 loss to Oregon
2012 - 52-17 loss to Arizona
2013 - 45-24 loss to Oregon
2013 - 53-24 loss to Arizona State
A 3 or more game losing streak in the pac-12 every year
2009 - 4 games ( ASU, Oregon, UCLA, Oregon State )
2010 - 3 games ( ASU, Stanford, Oregon )
2011 - 3 games ( Oregon, USC, Oregon State )
2012 - 3 games ( Oregon, USC, Arizona )
2013 - 3 games ( Stanford, Oregon, Arizona State )
Average and not improving pac-12 record every year
2009 - 4 wins, 5 losses
2010 - 5 wins, 4 losses
2011 - 5 wins, 4 losses
2012 - 5 wins, 4 losses
2013 - 3 wins, 4 losses so far
Record versus ranked opponents
2009 - 2-3
2010 - 3-4
2011 - 0-4
2012 - 2-4
2013 - 1-3
overall 8-18
Record versus the NW
1-2
2-1
1-2
1-2
0-1 so far
5-7 record overall
Record versus Oregon
0-5
Could we really do worse with a coaching change?
Comments
-
Wow.
We know what we have.
The question now becomes ...
Do we accept it, or do we improve on it?
-
Nowhere near contending for the conference championship once in five years. Nowhere close to winning championships and Rose Bowls.
-
But he can recruit!! What would we do if we lost him? He's doing it the right way...Huge and Baird say so.
-
18-8 vs. ranked opponents, 5-7 vs. the Northwest really stand out
-
Sark has moved down the pecking order. Now top recruits will wait to see what USC and UCLA offer in addition to Oregon before committing to Sark. Once committed, coaches like Riley and Leach will pick off who they want reminding recruits Sark is a Lameduck coach with a short term contract and too few wins with an AD who has bond payments to make on revenue promised from an ever growing grumbling fan base.Sarkingham said:But he can recruit!! What would we do if we lost him? He's doing it the right way...Huge and Baird say so.
-
Wins are important, but remember, so is culture.sarktastic said:
Sark has moved down the pecking order. Now top recruits will wait to see what USC and UCLA offer in addition to Oregon before committing to Sark. Once committed, coaches like Riley and Leach will pick off who they want reminding recruits Sark is a Lameduck coach with a short term contract and too few wins with an AD who has bond payments to make on revenue promised from an ever growing grumbling fan base.Sarkingham said:But he can recruit!! What would we do if we lost him? He's doing it the right way...Huge and Baird say so.
So if those kids want to go to SC or UCLA ... or even Oregon ... let'em.
Because we have a special culture. -
should be pinned
-
Outstanding work. Posted on DM.
-
Did you guys already forget the video of him throwing fish at Pike Place Market with Romar?? You can't buy that kind of publicity.
-
Fetters said he can't debate the facts or even call them average, but there is no point to rehash negative stuff from the past. It's about where we are going.
