Wilcox myth of the day
Comments
-
I compared Wilcox to Holt who is roughly the same fucking era don't get your point.priapism said:You have to admit tho that scoring has been going up steadily in the past decade with the spread of the spread O:
http://sports.yahoo.com/ncaa/football/stats/byteam?cat1=offense&cat2=Total&sort=537&conference=I-A_PAC12&year=2012
Spread O is here to stay for awhile IMO. Good CBs are worth their weight in cash-filled, fruit baskets.
Also just brought them up to show the fire the coordinator trick still doesn't fuck work. -
Scoring is up, even in the last 4 years.
-
Yards per play is what you need to look at and the D is 25th. Bottom line is Wilcox is now irrelevant in the conversation about firing Sark.
I would like to see the new coach keep Heyward & Tosh. I know some disagree but Tosh is single handily keeping recruiting alive since Sark/Nansen fucked up our in-state base. Tosh pulled in a great DL class last year and already has a few soft commits for 2015. The JC guy Claude Pelon is a UW lean right now and could probably start next to Shelton. Could you imagine Tosh recruiting on Mora's staff? -
Again this isn't to bash on Wilcox but I keep seeing tweets "You can't fire Sark! He has a great staff in place! He hired Wilcox which was a great hire!"
Just showing Wilcox isn't so great as a reason to retain Sark.
Far as I'm concerned if the new coach wants to fire Tosh I wouldn't mind either. I think he's overrated. -
Prob a good idea to keep Tosh - he seems to be able to get the guys he targets, minus Vanderdoes. There's most likely a valid reason why UW is recruiting McGary as a DE. Cozetto is a POS.
http://247sports.com/Player/Kaleb-McGary-19965 -
I don't know how Doogs are going to justify losing Baker and McGary. I'm sure they'll come up with something.priapism said:Prob a good idea to keep Tosh - he seems to be able to get the guys he targets, minus Vanderdoes. There's most likely a valid reason why UW is recruiting McGary as a DE. Cozetto is a POS.
http://247sports.com/Player/Kaleb-McGary-19965
Doogs always have a fresh excuse as to why you can't expect UW to land hometown player X. -
We know Budda is gone. Losing McGary should be the icing on the cake for firing Sark. We are so pathetic that doogs & pool boy will gloss over it.
-
Doogs will have an excuse though for both. "Sark thought McGary was a DE, he wanted to play OL. You can't blame a kid for choosing a school where he can play offense".HeretoBeatmyChest said:We know Budda is gone. Losing McGary should be the icing on the cake for firing Sark. We are so pathetic that doogs & pool boy will gloss over it.
As for Baker "Well the recruiting is different now. You can't expect to beat out a top tier program like Oregon who is so flashy for a kid like Baker. Oregon built it the right way with stability our day will come!".
I wish my comments were sarcastic but it will be close to actual Doog quotes come February. -
I will admit I was a too high on Wilcox. He's average. I think with a good head coach he is a good coach with a great work ethic, but he hasn't shown any consistent signs of greatness.
-
This comes off as me bashing Wilcox but it is to show that the myth that we should keep Sark because of Wilcox is fucking stupid.RoadDawg55 said:I will admit I was a too high on Wilcox. He's average. I think with a good head coach he is a good coach with a great work ethic, but he hasn't shown any consistent signs of greatness.
The coaching change for DC was some improvement but not much.
![[Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/b14605887e2b6b59902271a0095c9265_100.png)
