Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Figures never lie but liars figure.
Sledog
Member Posts: 37,683 
in Tug Tavern
Comments
-
Everybody know that, Parker
https://thsresearch.files.wordpress.com/2017/05/ef-gast-data-research-report-062717.pdf -
Good thing you 2 monkeys hate fake news.
-
-
Anyone who makes an argument for or against global warming based on surface temperature data is a retard. This study doesn't prove or disprove anything because the strongest evidence backing global warming is based on ice core sampling.
-
Tell Al Gore and Obama
-
We'll toss them into the retard sensationalist category with you and shitdog.doogie said:Tell Al Gore and Obama
-
It's clear neither of your read the actual report.
-
-
RedRocket said:
Anyone who makes an argument for or against global warming based on surface temperature data is a retard. This study doesn't prove or disprove anything because the strongest evidence backing global warming is based on ice core sampling.
-
Advocating policy based on shitscience is always special
-
I'm not moving the goal posts. Climate change is measured over long time periods. The time series for surface temperature measurements is less than 100 years. You can't use temperature data to prove or disprove climate change because it doesn't go back far enough . Ice core CO2 ppm data is the crux of climate change because it goes back thousands of years.HoustonHusky said:RedRocket said:Anyone who makes an argument for or against global warming based on surface temperature data is a retard. This study doesn't prove or disprove anything because the strongest evidence backing global warming is based on ice core sampling.
-
HoustonHusky said:
You still ignore that the article is nothing close to what the reality of the actual report says. That's the epitome of fake news. -
Helps Trump IMOdoogie said:Advocating policy based on shitscience is always special
-
Only thing fake is your posts. Shit data in = equal shit answer out.2001400ex said:HoustonHusky said:
You still ignore that the article is nothing close to what the reality of the actual report says. That's the epitome of fake news. -
If you don't like the result, question the data.Sledog said:
Only thing fake is your posts. Shit data in = equal shit answer out.2001400ex said:HoustonHusky said:
You still ignore that the article is nothing close to what the reality of the actual report says. That's the epitome of fake news.
Still you don't address your fake news. -
Why did MIT bash the Obama legacy or Hillary?2001400ex said:
If you don't like the result, question the data.Sledog said:
Only thing fake is your posts. Shit data in = equal shit answer out.2001400ex said:HoustonHusky said:
You still ignore that the article is nothing close to what the reality of the actual report says. That's the epitome of fake news.
Still you don't address your fake news. -
They didn't. Read the actual report. Dumbass.Sledog said:
Why did MIT bash the Obama legacy or Hillary?2001400ex said:
If you don't like the result, question the data.Sledog said:
Only thing fake is your posts. Shit data in = equal shit answer out.2001400ex said:HoustonHusky said:
You still ignore that the article is nothing close to what the reality of the actual report says. That's the epitome of fake news.
Still you don't address your fake news. -
Climate change has got to be the dumbest fucking thing.
Even if it's a thing...so what? Your ac bills go up like 100 bucks over the next 100 years?
I'd be more concerned about Jake's ACL.
I'm hearing it's tender and TSIO. -
I think he's referring to the dudes who see a headline and it says MIT and bashing global warming and don't actually read anything else.doogie said: -
I'm alright with the "yeah so what position". Plenty of disagreement about how much warming will occur in future, what the impacts will be and if we can do anything about it anyways.Pitchfork51 said:Climate change has got to be the dumbest fucking thing.
Even if it's a thing...so what? Your ac bills go up like 100 bucks over the next 100 years?
I'd be more concerned about Jake's ACL.
I'm hearing it's tender and TSIO. -
You're right. He belongs on the list.doogie said: -
You really have to be one of the dumbest people alive. You say something stupid like that and then post a chart that uses the exact data that the article says is shit to "prove" your point.2001400ex said:HoustonHusky said:
You still ignore that the article is nothing close to what the reality of the actual report says. That's the epitome of fake news.
Only HondoFS could post something so stupid... -
Now I feel better and can go on with my life.RedRocket said:
I'm alright with the "yeah so what position". Plenty of disagreement about how much warming will occur in future, what the impacts will be and if we can do anything about it anyways.Pitchfork51 said:Climate change has got to be the dumbest fucking thing.
Even if it's a thing...so what? Your ac bills go up like 100 bucks over the next 100 years?
I'd be more concerned about Jake's ACL.
I'm hearing it's tender and TSIO. -
It's one thing to deny how much or if humans have caused the warming. It's another to deny that the Earth isn't warmer than 100 years ago. That's some kind of special stupid. Politicians and journalists know more about the climate than people who study the climate for a living in your world.HoustonHusky said:
You really have to be one of the dumbest people alive. You say something stupid like that and then post a chart that uses the exact data that the article says is shit to "prove" your point.2001400ex said:HoustonHusky said:
You still ignore that the article is nothing close to what the reality of the actual report says. That's the epitome of fake news.
Only HondoFS could post something so stupid... -
We're in a lull of an ice age faggot. The human race will die of cold when the lull ends.2001400ex said:
It's one thing to deny how much or if humans have caused the warming. It's another to deny that the Earth isn't warmer than 100 years ago. That's some kind of special stupid. Politicians and journalists know more about the climate than people who study the climate for a living in your world.HoustonHusky said:
You really have to be one of the dumbest people alive. You say something stupid like that and then post a chart that uses the exact data that the article says is shit to "prove" your point.2001400ex said:HoustonHusky said:
You still ignore that the article is nothing close to what the reality of the actual report says. That's the epitome of fake news.
Only HondoFS could post something so stupid... -
-
Climate change will occur rapidly when the SMOD strikes Earth generating temps in the 5000 Kelvin range and melting everyone on this bored. Just shut up, sit back, and wait for death.
-
First,2001400ex said:
It's one thing to deny how much or if humans have caused the warming. It's another to deny that the Earth isn't warmer than 100 years ago. That's some kind of special stupid. Politicians and journalists know more about the climate than people who study the climate for a living in your world.HoustonHusky said:
You really have to be one of the dumbest people alive. You say something stupid like that and then post a chart that uses the exact data that the article says is shit to "prove" your point.2001400ex said:HoustonHusky said:
You still ignore that the article is nothing close to what the reality of the actual report says. That's the epitome of fake news.
Only HondoFS could post something so stupid...
Way to ignore your original idiocy.
Second, the entire point of their article is that the historical data yet again changes to try and prove what is turning out to be political and not scientific points. If GW is so obvious, why again do they keep changing the historical data to try and prove it?
You can not like what they say, but don't say completely idiotic things like "You still ignore that the article is nothing close to what the reality of the actual report says. That's the epitome of fake news." Their entire point was that the data sets are not independent, and that the historical data sets have been continuously altered to try and support global warming and contradict a lot of historical subjective data.
This is the same thing the fraud Mann did to try and prove his version of "Global Warming"...change history. And morons like HondoFS fall for it hook, line, and sinker...
-
If you need historical temperature data to support global warming, you are a special kind of stupid. It's almost like there's other metrics to use.HoustonHusky said:
First,2001400ex said:
It's one thing to deny how much or if humans have caused the warming. It's another to deny that the Earth isn't warmer than 100 years ago. That's some kind of special stupid. Politicians and journalists know more about the climate than people who study the climate for a living in your world.HoustonHusky said:
You really have to be one of the dumbest people alive. You say something stupid like that and then post a chart that uses the exact data that the article says is shit to "prove" your point.2001400ex said:HoustonHusky said:
You still ignore that the article is nothing close to what the reality of the actual report says. That's the epitome of fake news.
Only HondoFS could post something so stupid...
Way to ignore your original idiocy.
Second, the entire point of their article is that the historical data yet again changes to try and prove what is turning out to be political and not scientific points. If GW is so obvious, why again do they keep changing the historical data to try and prove it?
You can not like what they say, but don't say completely idiotic things like "You still ignore that the article is nothing close to what the reality of the actual report says. That's the epitome of fake news." Their entire point was that the data sets are not independent, and that the historical data sets have been continuously altered to try and support global warming and contradict a lot of historical subjective data.
This is the same thing the fraud Mann did to try and prove his version of "Global Warming"...change history. And morons like HondoFS fall for it hook, line, and sinker...
That being said, it would be wise to understand why temperature data is corrected. Grab some popcorn and do some reading from people who study the shit for a living. You seem to like to research shit, you should really educate yourself on this and not succumb to Breitbart type bullshit.
