Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Who is excited for the end of net neutrality?

«13

Comments

  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    They will monetize it anyway they can.
  • UWhuskytskeet
    UWhuskytskeet Member Posts: 7,113
    2001400ex said:

    They will monetize it anyway they can.

    Especially with cable on its death bed. Giving ISPs free rein right now is a horrible idea.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    No customer package that has Pornhub and HH? No buy

    That's $14.99 an hour for softcore and $19.99 an hour for hardcore.
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,913
    edited July 2017

    image

    Be sure to visit the opt out of the sharing information with 3rd parties while you're there as to avoid having it shared and sold.

    As that was your outrage du jour a couple months ago.
  • UWhuskytskeet
    UWhuskytskeet Member Posts: 7,113
    salemcoog said:

    image

    Be sure to visit the opt out of the sharing information with 3rd parties while you're there as to avoid having it shared and sold.

    As that was your outrage du jour a couple months ago.
    Roasted!
  • priapism
    priapism Member Posts: 2,294
    Trump should stack the FCC deck with cable executives to get this forced through. No one has time for cable tv anymore, so they need to find a way to transfer those $100-150 cable bills/month to something else.
  • ThomasFremont
    ThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    I hear controlled internet is working GREAT in Russia and China!
  • HuskyJW
    HuskyJW Member Posts: 15,256
    BBC on the Preferred Plan

    I LOL'ed
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    If the government is the best option for healthcare then I certainly trust them to run the nternets

    Learn the difference between health care and health insurance. No one is suggesting that hospitals and doctors go under the government.
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,839
    2001400ex said:

    If the government is the best option for healthcare then I certainly trust them to run the nternets

    Learn the difference between health care and health insurance. No one is suggesting that hospitals and doctors go under the government.
    yet*
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,913
    2001400ex said:

    If the government is the best option for healthcare then I certainly trust them to run the nternets

    Learn the difference between health care and health insurance. No one is suggesting that hospitals and doctors go under the government.
    No one's been more critical of the potential for government involvement in the operation of Hospitals than Hondo
  • UWhuskytskeet
    UWhuskytskeet Member Posts: 7,113

    If the government is the best option for healthcare then I certainly trust them to run the nternets

    So you have no clue what net neutrality is. Got it.
  • Fenderbender123
    Fenderbender123 Member Posts: 2,989
    The FCC enforces the regulations, doesn't it?
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,705 Founders Club

    If the government is the best option for healthcare then I certainly trust them to run the nternets

    So you have no clue what net neutrality is. Got it.
    You got me

    Your so smart and stuff
  • UWhuskytskeet
    UWhuskytskeet Member Posts: 7,113

    If the government is the best option for healthcare then I certainly trust them to run the nternets

    So you have no clue what net neutrality is. Got it.
    You got me

    Your so smart and stuff
    It's weird how this has been shaped into a left/right thing. There is zero reason to not want NN unless you hold stakes in an ISP.

    It would be like cheering for water companies to have the ability to charge you more for using water to make generic coffee, and less for making Starbucks. Water is water. Data is data.

    But regulashuns!!!!
  • CuntWaffle
    CuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,499

    If the government is the best option for healthcare then I certainly trust them to run the nternets

    So you have no clue what net neutrality is. Got it.
    You got me

    Your so smart and stuff
    Link?
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,913

    If the government is the best option for healthcare then I certainly trust them to run the nternets

    So you have no clue what net neutrality is. Got it.
    You got me

    Your so smart and stuff
    It's weird how this has been shaped into a left/right thing. There is zero reason to not want NN unless you hold stakes in an ISP.

    It would be like cheering for water companies to have the ability to charge you more for using water to make generic coffee, and less for making Starbucks. Water is water. Data is data.

    But regulashuns!!!!
    It's because of liberal shills like yourself fear mongering as if the TSIO already.



    HTH
  • UWhuskytskeet
    UWhuskytskeet Member Posts: 7,113
    salemcoog said:

    If the government is the best option for healthcare then I certainly trust them to run the nternets

    So you have no clue what net neutrality is. Got it.
    You got me

    Your so smart and stuff
    It's weird how this has been shaped into a left/right thing. There is zero reason to not want NN unless you hold stakes in an ISP.

    It would be like cheering for water companies to have the ability to charge you more for using water to make generic coffee, and less for making Starbucks. Water is water. Data is data.

    But regulashuns!!!!
    It's because of liberal shills like yourself fear mongering as if the TSIO already.



    HTH
    Is stating facts fear mongering? I didn't realize how sensitive you are.
  • dflea
    dflea Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,287 Swaye's Wigwam

    salemcoog said:

    If the government is the best option for healthcare then I certainly trust them to run the nternets

    So you have no clue what net neutrality is. Got it.
    You got me

    Your so smart and stuff
    It's weird how this has been shaped into a left/right thing. There is zero reason to not want NN unless you hold stakes in an ISP.

    It would be like cheering for water companies to have the ability to charge you more for using water to make generic coffee, and less for making Starbucks. Water is water. Data is data.

    But regulashuns!!!!
    It's because of liberal shills like yourself fear mongering as if the TSIO already.



    HTH
    Is stating facts fear mongering? I didn't realize how sensitive you are.
    Snowflake.
  • Southerndawg
    Southerndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,346 Founders Club

    If the government is the best option for healthcare then I certainly trust them to run the nternets

    So you have no clue what net neutrality is. Got it.
    Ironic
  • UWhuskytskeet
    UWhuskytskeet Member Posts: 7,113

    If the government is the best option for healthcare then I certainly trust them to run the nternets

    So you have no clue what net neutrality is. Got it.
    Ironic
    Ah shit, did Breitbart put out an opinion piece earlier? Let's hear your take.
  • Southerndawg
    Southerndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,346 Founders Club
    salemcoog said:

    If the government is the best option for healthcare then I certainly trust them to run the nternets

    So you have no clue what net neutrality is. Got it.
    You got me

    Your so smart and stuff
    It's weird how this has been shaped into a left/right thing. There is zero reason to not want NN unless you hold stakes in an ISP.

    It would be like cheering for water companies to have the ability to charge you more for using water to make generic coffee, and less for making Starbucks. Water is water. Data is data.

    But regulashuns!!!!
    It's because of liberal shills like yourself fear mongering as if the TSIO already.



    HTH
    There's fear mongering used by the corrupt to persuade the ignorant, and then there's the ignorant perpetuating the fear mongering as if TSIO already. What we have here is clearly the latter.
  • UWhuskytskeet
    UWhuskytskeet Member Posts: 7,113

    salemcoog said:

    If the government is the best option for healthcare then I certainly trust them to run the nternets

    So you have no clue what net neutrality is. Got it.
    You got me

    Your so smart and stuff
    It's weird how this has been shaped into a left/right thing. There is zero reason to not want NN unless you hold stakes in an ISP.

    It would be like cheering for water companies to have the ability to charge you more for using water to make generic coffee, and less for making Starbucks. Water is water. Data is data.

    But regulashuns!!!!
    It's because of liberal shills like yourself fear mongering as if the TSIO already.



    HTH
    There's fear mongering used by the corrupt to persuade the ignorant, and then there's the ignorant perpetuating the fear mongering as if TSIO already. What we have here is clearly the latter.
    Still waiting for your take.
  • Southerndawg
    Southerndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,346 Founders Club

    salemcoog said:

    If the government is the best option for healthcare then I certainly trust them to run the nternets

    So you have no clue what net neutrality is. Got it.
    You got me

    Your so smart and stuff
    It's weird how this has been shaped into a left/right thing. There is zero reason to not want NN unless you hold stakes in an ISP.

    It would be like cheering for water companies to have the ability to charge you more for using water to make generic coffee, and less for making Starbucks. Water is water. Data is data.

    But regulashuns!!!!
    It's because of liberal shills like yourself fear mongering as if the TSIO already.



    HTH
    There's fear mongering used by the corrupt to persuade the ignorant, and then there's the ignorant perpetuating the fear mongering as if TSIO already. What we have here is clearly the latter.
    Still waiting for your take.
    No, you're not. Your only interest is in agreement that "Net Neutrality" as policy and regulation is only about net neutrality, which it clearly isn't. I suggest you develop a deeper understanding, try reading from sources other than the Daily Kos and Huffington Post, and learn a little history, this game has been played before.
  • UWhuskytskeet
    UWhuskytskeet Member Posts: 7,113

    salemcoog said:

    If the government is the best option for healthcare then I certainly trust them to run the nternets

    So you have no clue what net neutrality is. Got it.
    You got me

    Your so smart and stuff
    It's weird how this has been shaped into a left/right thing. There is zero reason to not want NN unless you hold stakes in an ISP.

    It would be like cheering for water companies to have the ability to charge you more for using water to make generic coffee, and less for making Starbucks. Water is water. Data is data.

    But regulashuns!!!!
    It's because of liberal shills like yourself fear mongering as if the TSIO already.



    HTH
    There's fear mongering used by the corrupt to persuade the ignorant, and then there's the ignorant perpetuating the fear mongering as if TSIO already. What we have here is clearly the latter.
    Still waiting for your take.
    No, you're not. Your only interest is in agreement that "Net Neutrality" as policy and regulation is only about net neutrality, which it clearly isn't. I suggest you develop a deeper understanding, try reading from sources other than the Daily Kos and Huffington Post, and learn a little history, this game has been played before.
    image

    You are second to Sledog in your love for biased reporting.

    Re: Net Neutrality: You basically don't have an actual opinion other than parroting spooky right-wing conspiracies.

  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,661
    I have no clue what net neutrality is.

    And I refuse to bother to learn.
  • UWhuskytskeet
    UWhuskytskeet Member Posts: 7,113

    I have no clue what net neutrality is.

    And I refuse to bother to learn.

    At least you admit it.
  • Southerndawg
    Southerndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,346 Founders Club

    salemcoog said:

    If the government is the best option for healthcare then I certainly trust them to run the nternets

    So you have no clue what net neutrality is. Got it.
    You got me

    Your so smart and stuff
    It's weird how this has been shaped into a left/right thing. There is zero reason to not want NN unless you hold stakes in an ISP.

    It would be like cheering for water companies to have the ability to charge you more for using water to make generic coffee, and less for making Starbucks. Water is water. Data is data.

    But regulashuns!!!!
    It's because of liberal shills like yourself fear mongering as if the TSIO already.



    HTH
    There's fear mongering used by the corrupt to persuade the ignorant, and then there's the ignorant perpetuating the fear mongering as if TSIO already. What we have here is clearly the latter.
    Still waiting for your take.
    No, you're not. Your only interest is in agreement that "Net Neutrality" as policy and regulation is only about net neutrality, which it clearly isn't. I suggest you develop a deeper understanding, try reading from sources other than the Daily Kos and Huffington Post, and learn a little history, this game has been played before.
    image

    You are second to Sledog in your love for biased reporting.

    Re: Net Neutrality: You basically don't have an actual opinion other than parroting spooky right-wing conspiracies.

    This is becoming a waste of time, you apparently have a very limited memory.

    http://hardcorehusky.com/forums/#/discussion/comment/592175