Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Huskies lost Ross, still have Pettis
DerekJohnson
Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 68,485 
Comments
-
Jesus, why don't start posting links to doogpound.
-
Brilliant analysis.
-
I remember the one Pettis drop. It lead to an ASU interception lol
-
Wow you don't get sarkasm do you.Gladstone said:I remember the one Pettis drop. It lead to an ASU interception lol
-
Pettis has a well documented dropping problem.
-
Captain obvious everyone. What's next you're going to tell us Michael Jackson was black when everybody knew he was a white man.DerekJohnson said: -
PFF has some decent ideas but this tweet is exactly why they're mostly shit. Percentage of dropped targets is a completely worthless statistic. If the QB misses you by 5 yards and you never had a chance at the ball that counts as a target that wasn't dropped. As evidenced by Pettis having 53 catches, but 72 targets.
Drop percentage is a worthwhile stat. It requires some subjectivity (determining if a ball was dropped or not isn't an exact science), but has value. But only if you're finding the percentage of balls that could have been caught that were dropped. In this case, Pettis caught 53 of 54 catchable balls (per PFF's tracking). That's damn good, and deserves to be applauded.
1 drop in 72 targets could not be more meaningless. -
dnc said:
PFF has some decent ideas but this tweet is exactly why they're mostly shit. Percentage of dropped targets is a completely worthless statistic. If the QB misses you by 5 yards and you never had a chance at the ball that counts as a target that wasn't dropped. As evidenced by Pettis having 53 catches, but 72 targets.
Drop percentage is a worthwhile stat. It requires some subjectivity (determining if a ball was dropped or not isn't an exact science), but has value. But only if you're finding the percentage of balls that could have been caught that were dropped. In this case, Pettis caught 53 of 54 catchable balls (per PFF's tracking). That's damn good, and deserves to be applauded.
1 drop in 72 targets could not be more meaningless.
Hi -
You only point out the ones that he dropped, what about the ones that he caught and gained no yardage on??Baseman said:dnc said:
PFF has some decent ideas but this tweet is exactly why they're mostly shit. Percentage of dropped targets is a completely worthless statistic. If the QB misses you by 5 yards and you never had a chance at the ball that counts as a target that wasn't dropped. As evidenced by Pettis having 53 catches, but 72 targets.
Drop percentage is a worthwhile stat. It requires some subjectivity (determining if a ball was dropped or not isn't an exact science), but has value. But only if you're finding the percentage of balls that could have been caught that were dropped. In this case, Pettis caught 53 of 54 catchable balls (per PFF's tracking). That's damn good, and deserves to be applauded.
1 drop in 72 targets could not be more meaningless.
Hi -
Not enough bandwidthdnc said:
You only point out the ones that he dropped, what about the ones that he caught and gained no yardage on??Baseman said:dnc said:
PFF has some decent ideas but this tweet is exactly why they're mostly shit. Percentage of dropped targets is a completely worthless statistic. If the QB misses you by 5 yards and you never had a chance at the ball that counts as a target that wasn't dropped. As evidenced by Pettis having 53 catches, but 72 targets.
Drop percentage is a worthwhile stat. It requires some subjectivity (determining if a ball was dropped or not isn't an exact science), but has value. But only if you're finding the percentage of balls that could have been caught that were dropped. In this case, Pettis caught 53 of 54 catchable balls (per PFF's tracking). That's damn good, and deserves to be applauded.
1 drop in 72 targets could not be more meaningless.
Hi -
GRUNDLE DON'T EVEN STARtBaseman said:
Not enough bandwidthdnc said:
You only point out the ones that he dropped, what about the ones that he caught and gained no yardage on??Baseman said:dnc said:
PFF has some decent ideas but this tweet is exactly why they're mostly shit. Percentage of dropped targets is a completely worthless statistic. If the QB misses you by 5 yards and you never had a chance at the ball that counts as a target that wasn't dropped. As evidenced by Pettis having 53 catches, but 72 targets.
Drop percentage is a worthwhile stat. It requires some subjectivity (determining if a ball was dropped or not isn't an exact science), but has value. But only if you're finding the percentage of balls that could have been caught that were dropped. In this case, Pettis caught 53 of 54 catchable balls (per PFF's tracking). That's damn good, and deserves to be applauded.
1 drop in 72 targets could not be more meaningless.
Hi -
I had an epiphany watching the Oregon game the other day, that Mi Chico is Mickens with the ability to run forward after the catch.dnc said:
You only point out the ones that he dropped, what about the ones that he caught and gained no yardage on??Baseman said:dnc said:
PFF has some decent ideas but this tweet is exactly why they're mostly shit. Percentage of dropped targets is a completely worthless statistic. If the QB misses you by 5 yards and you never had a chance at the ball that counts as a target that wasn't dropped. As evidenced by Pettis having 53 catches, but 72 targets.
Drop percentage is a worthwhile stat. It requires some subjectivity (determining if a ball was dropped or not isn't an exact science), but has value. But only if you're finding the percentage of balls that could have been caught that were dropped. In this case, Pettis caught 53 of 54 catchable balls (per PFF's tracking). That's damn good, and deserves to be applauded.
1 drop in 72 targets could not be more meaningless.
Hi -
So not Mickens thenhuskyhooligan said:
I had an epiphany watching the Oregon game the other day, that Mi Chico is Mickens with the ability to run forward after the catch.dnc said:
You only point out the ones that he dropped, what about the ones that he caught and gained no yardage on??Baseman said:dnc said:
PFF has some decent ideas but this tweet is exactly why they're mostly shit. Percentage of dropped targets is a completely worthless statistic. If the QB misses you by 5 yards and you never had a chance at the ball that counts as a target that wasn't dropped. As evidenced by Pettis having 53 catches, but 72 targets.
Drop percentage is a worthwhile stat. It requires some subjectivity (determining if a ball was dropped or not isn't an exact science), but has value. But only if you're finding the percentage of balls that could have been caught that were dropped. In this case, Pettis caught 53 of 54 catchable balls (per PFF's tracking). That's damn good, and deserves to be applauded.
1 drop in 72 targets could not be more meaningless.
Hi -
Mickens was great at the bubble screen for -2 yards to set up 3rd and 12.
-
Setting up an out route for 11 yardsCuntWaffle said:Mickens was great at the bubble screen for -2 yards to set up 3rd and 12.
-
Pettis' snag of an errant Browning pass in the end zone at arizona justifies his scholarship, by itself.
-
Was it for sure errant though? I think he was throwing to Pettis.Passion said:Pettis' snag of an errant Browning pass in the end zone at arizona justifies his scholarship, by itself.
Edit go to 2:07
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tBgUNJJyz-w -
Pretty sure it was to the guy (Chico?) behind Pettis and DP jumped up and snagged it.Gladstone said:
Was it for sure errant though? I think he was throwing to Pettis.Passion said:Pettis' snag of an errant Browning pass in the end zone at arizona justifies his scholarship, by itself.
Edit go to 2:07https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tBgUNJJyz-w
I'm a relatively big doog for Pettis - he always reminded me a bit of Steve Largent. Great hands, odd movement style, but sneaky fast and does really well in space and at crunch times.
NOT SAYING HE'S LARGENT DON'T TWIST. -
Who is going to replace John Ross?
-
at least someone appreciates me hereBaseman said: -
Yes.dnc said:
So not Mickens thenhuskyhooligan said:
I had an epiphany watching the Oregon game the other day, that Mi Chico is Mickens with the ability to run forward after the catch.dnc said:
You only point out the ones that he dropped, what about the ones that he caught and gained no yardage on??Baseman said:dnc said:
PFF has some decent ideas but this tweet is exactly why they're mostly shit. Percentage of dropped targets is a completely worthless statistic. If the QB misses you by 5 yards and you never had a chance at the ball that counts as a target that wasn't dropped. As evidenced by Pettis having 53 catches, but 72 targets.
Drop percentage is a worthwhile stat. It requires some subjectivity (determining if a ball was dropped or not isn't an exact science), but has value. But only if you're finding the percentage of balls that could have been caught that were dropped. In this case, Pettis caught 53 of 54 catchable balls (per PFF's tracking). That's damn good, and deserves to be applauded.
1 drop in 72 targets could not be more meaningless.
Hi -
Dont bogart my shit my friend. You forgot the ° trademark symbol for pup's material Baabs. Please denote in future posts said reference....or i'll bring Kim's attorneys on over.Baseman said: -
Come on Dennis, you know better than that. HH makes only raced based comparisonsDennis_DeYoung said:
Pretty sure it was to the guy (Chico?) behind Pettis and DP jumped up and snagged it.Gladstone said:
Was it for sure errant though? I think he was throwing to Pettis.Passion said:Pettis' snag of an errant Browning pass in the end zone at arizona justifies his scholarship, by itself.
Edit go to 2:07https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tBgUNJJyz-w
I'm a relatively big doog for Pettis - he always reminded me a bit of Steve Largent. Great hands, odd movement style, but sneaky fast and does really well in space and at crunch times.
NOT SAYING HE'S LARGENT DON'T TWIST. -
I am - and continue- resting easy.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
Dont bogart my shit my friend. You forgot the ° trademark symbol for pup's material Baabs. Please denote in future posts said reference....or i'll bring Kim's attorneys on over.Baseman said: -
Looks a lot like Jerry Rice.WeakarmCobra said:
Come on Dennis, you know better than that. HH makes only raced based comparisonsDennis_DeYoung said:
Pretty sure it was to the guy (Chico?) behind Pettis and DP jumped up and snagged it.Gladstone said:
Was it for sure errant though? I think he was throwing to Pettis.Passion said:Pettis' snag of an errant Browning pass in the end zone at arizona justifies his scholarship, by itself.
Edit go to 2:07https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tBgUNJJyz-w
I'm a relatively big doog for Pettis - he always reminded me a bit of Steve Largent. Great hands, odd movement style, but sneaky fast and does really well in space and at crunch times.
NOT SAYING HE'S LARGENT DON'T TWIST. -
Fixed that for youdnc said:
You only point out the ones that he dropped, what about the ones that he caught andBaseman said:dnc said:
PFF has some decent ideas but this tweet is exactly why they're mostly shit. Percentage of dropped targets is a completely worthless statistic. If the QB misses you by 5 yards and you never had a chance at the ball that counts as a target that wasn't dropped. As evidenced by Pettis having 53 catches, but 72 targets.
Drop percentage is a worthwhile stat. It requires some subjectivity (determining if a ball was dropped or not isn't an exact science), but has value. But only if you're finding the percentage of balls that could have been caught that were dropped. In this case, Pettis caught 53 of 54 catchable balls (per PFF's tracking). That's damn good, and deserves to be applauded.
1 drop in 72 targets could not be more meaningless.
Higained no yardage onran backwards on?? -
Pettis is a better football player -athlete fthan Ross...pure WR too. Pettis is a natural WR, a poetic acrobat by day, a gold-laced assassin under the lights.
He'll top Ross's '16 td total thru air. I think 18- 20 td's is likely.
Pettis IS a stud WR, Ross became one while redshirting (which Pup called). He got a lot better. The Oregon game showed his ability, and NFL scouts his flypaper hands. Without his combine 4.2, he wasnt going in 1st round...well maybe late.
Pettis is Lynn Swann, Ross is Joey Galloway. Quick..head to Wikipedia you cunts and get back to pup with your retorts. Id take Ross of course, but in College id be pretty happy with either. Pettis is going to be a great senior WR. And one UW hasnt seen, statistically, in awhile. -
PGOS returns as well
-
