PFF has some decent ideas but this tweet is exactly why they're mostly shit. Percentage of dropped targets is a completely worthless statistic. If the QB misses you by 5 yards and you never had a chance at the ball that counts as a target that wasn't dropped. As evidenced by Pettis having 53 catches, but 72 targets.
Drop percentage is a worthwhile stat. It requires some subjectivity (determining if a ball was dropped or not isn't an exact science), but has value. But only if you're finding the percentage of balls that could have been caught that were dropped. In this case, Pettis caught 53 of 54 catchable balls (per PFF's tracking). That's damn good, and deserves to be applauded.
1 drop in 72 targets could not be more meaningless.
Hi
You only point out the ones that he dropped, what about the ones that he caught and gained no yardage on??
I had an epiphany watching the Oregon game the other day, that Mi Chico is Mickens with the ability to run forward after the catch.
Dont bogart my shit my friend. You forgot the ° trademark symbol for pup's material Baabs. Please denote in future posts said reference....or i'll bring Kim's attorneys on over.
Pretty sure it was to the guy (Chico?) behind Pettis and DP jumped up and snagged it.
I'm a relatively big doog for Pettis - he always reminded me a bit of Steve Largent. Great hands, odd movement style, but sneaky fast and does really well in space and at crunch times.
NOT SAYING HE'S LARGENT DON'T TWIST.
Come on Dennis, you know better than that. HH makes only raced based comparisons
Dont bogart my shit my friend. You forgot the ° trademark symbol for pup's material Baabs. Please denote in future posts said reference....or i'll bring Kim's attorneys on over.
Pretty sure it was to the guy (Chico?) behind Pettis and DP jumped up and snagged it.
I'm a relatively big doog for Pettis - he always reminded me a bit of Steve Largent. Great hands, odd movement style, but sneaky fast and does really well in space and at crunch times.
NOT SAYING HE'S LARGENT DON'T TWIST.
Come on Dennis, you know better than that. HH makes only raced based comparisons
PFF has some decent ideas but this tweet is exactly why they're mostly shit. Percentage of dropped targets is a completely worthless statistic. If the QB misses you by 5 yards and you never had a chance at the ball that counts as a target that wasn't dropped. As evidenced by Pettis having 53 catches, but 72 targets.
Drop percentage is a worthwhile stat. It requires some subjectivity (determining if a ball was dropped or not isn't an exact science), but has value. But only if you're finding the percentage of balls that could have been caught that were dropped. In this case, Pettis caught 53 of 54 catchable balls (per PFF's tracking). That's damn good, and deserves to be applauded.
1 drop in 72 targets could not be more meaningless.
Hi
You only point out the ones that he dropped, what about the ones that he caught and gained no yardage onran backwards on??
Pettis is a better football player -athlete fthan Ross...pure WR too. Pettis is a natural WR, a poetic acrobat by day, a gold-laced assassin under the lights. He'll top Ross's '16 td total thru air. I think 18- 20 td's is likely. Pettis IS a stud WR, Ross became one while redshirting (which Pup called). He got a lot better. The Oregon game showed his ability, and NFL scouts his flypaper hands. Without his combine 4.2, he wasnt going in 1st round...well maybe late.
Pettis is Lynn Swann, Ross is Joey Galloway. Quick..head to Wikipedia you cunts and get back to pup with your retorts. Id take Ross of course, but in College id be pretty happy with either. Pettis is going to be a great senior WR. And one UW hasnt seen, statistically, in awhile.
Comments
He'll top Ross's '16 td total thru air. I think 18- 20 td's is likely.
Pettis IS a stud WR, Ross became one while redshirting (which Pup called). He got a lot better. The Oregon game showed his ability, and NFL scouts his flypaper hands. Without his combine 4.2, he wasnt going in 1st round...well maybe late.
Pettis is Lynn Swann, Ross is Joey Galloway. Quick..head to Wikipedia you cunts and get back to pup with your retorts. Id take Ross of course, but in College id be pretty happy with either. Pettis is going to be a great senior WR. And one UW hasnt seen, statistically, in awhile.