Huskies lost Ross, still have Pettis

Comments

• FireCohen Member Posts: 21,823

  July 2017

  Jesus, why don't start posting links to doogpound.

  2 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• backthepack Member Posts: 19,923

  July 2017 edited July 2017

  Brilliant analysis.

  0 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• Gladstone Member Posts: 16,419

  July 2017

  I remember the one Pettis drop. It lead to an ASU interception lol

  -2 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• backthepack Member Posts: 19,923

  July 2017

  Gladstone said:

  I remember the one Pettis drop. It lead to an ASU interception lol

  Wow you don't get sarkasm do you.

  0 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• allpurpleallgold Member Posts: 8,771

  July 2017

  Pettis has a well documented dropping problem.

  3 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• Baseman Member Posts: 12,369

  July 2017

  DerekJohnson said:

  https://pacifictakes.com/washington-huskies/2017/7/5/15918564/washington-huskies-football-stats-john-ross-dante-pettis-video-highlights

  Thanks Taft!

  2 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• DubSixGamer Member Posts: 164

  July 2017 edited July 2017

  DerekJohnson said:

  https://pacifictakes.com/washington-huskies/2017/7/5/15918564/washington-huskies-football-stats-john-ross-dante-pettis-video-highlights

  Captain obvious everyone. What's next you're going to tell us Michael Jackson was black when everybody knew he was a white man.

  2 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• dnc Member Posts: 56,823

  July 2017

  https://twitter.com/PFF_College/status/876250876888981504?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pacifictakes.com%2Fwashington-huskies%2F2017%2F7%2F5%2F15918564%2Fwashington-huskies-football-stats-john-ross-dante-pettis-video-highlights

  
  
  PFF has some decent ideas but this tweet is exactly why they're mostly shit. Percentage of dropped targets is a completely worthless statistic. If the QB misses you by 5 yards and you never had a chance at the ball that counts as a target that wasn't dropped. As evidenced by Pettis having 53 catches, but 72 targets.
  
  Drop percentage is a worthwhile stat. It requires some subjectivity (determining if a ball was dropped or not isn't an exact science), but has value. But only if you're finding the percentage of balls that could have been caught that were dropped. In this case, Pettis caught 53 of 54 catchable balls (per PFF's tracking). That's damn good, and deserves to be applauded.
  
  1 drop in 72 targets could not be more meaningless.

  9 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• Baseman Member Posts: 12,369

  July 2017

  dnc said:

  https://twitter.com/PFF_College/status/876250876888981504?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pacifictakes.com%2Fwashington-huskies%2F2017%2F7%2F5%2F15918564%2Fwashington-huskies-football-stats-john-ross-dante-pettis-video-highlights

  
  
  PFF has some decent ideas but this tweet is exactly why they're mostly shit. Percentage of dropped targets is a completely worthless statistic. If the QB misses you by 5 yards and you never had a chance at the ball that counts as a target that wasn't dropped. As evidenced by Pettis having 53 catches, but 72 targets.
  
  Drop percentage is a worthwhile stat. It requires some subjectivity (determining if a ball was dropped or not isn't an exact science), but has value. But only if you're finding the percentage of balls that could have been caught that were dropped. In this case, Pettis caught 53 of 54 catchable balls (per PFF's tracking). That's damn good, and deserves to be applauded.
  
  1 drop in 72 targets could not be more meaningless.

  
  
  Hi

  18 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• dnc Member Posts: 56,823

  July 2017

  Baseman said:

  dnc said:

  https://twitter.com/PFF_College/status/876250876888981504?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pacifictakes.com%2Fwashington-huskies%2F2017%2F7%2F5%2F15918564%2Fwashington-huskies-football-stats-john-ross-dante-pettis-video-highlights

  
  
  PFF has some decent ideas but this tweet is exactly why they're mostly shit. Percentage of dropped targets is a completely worthless statistic. If the QB misses you by 5 yards and you never had a chance at the ball that counts as a target that wasn't dropped. As evidenced by Pettis having 53 catches, but 72 targets.
  
  Drop percentage is a worthwhile stat. It requires some subjectivity (determining if a ball was dropped or not isn't an exact science), but has value. But only if you're finding the percentage of balls that could have been caught that were dropped. In this case, Pettis caught 53 of 54 catchable balls (per PFF's tracking). That's damn good, and deserves to be applauded.
  
  1 drop in 72 targets could not be more meaningless.

  
  
  Hi

  You only point out the ones that he dropped, what about the ones that he caught and gained no yardage on??

  13 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• Baseman Member Posts: 12,369

  July 2017

  dnc said:

  Baseman said:

  dnc said:

  https://twitter.com/PFF_College/status/876250876888981504?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pacifictakes.com%2Fwashington-huskies%2F2017%2F7%2F5%2F15918564%2Fwashington-huskies-football-stats-john-ross-dante-pettis-video-highlights

  
  
  PFF has some decent ideas but this tweet is exactly why they're mostly shit. Percentage of dropped targets is a completely worthless statistic. If the QB misses you by 5 yards and you never had a chance at the ball that counts as a target that wasn't dropped. As evidenced by Pettis having 53 catches, but 72 targets.
  
  Drop percentage is a worthwhile stat. It requires some subjectivity (determining if a ball was dropped or not isn't an exact science), but has value. But only if you're finding the percentage of balls that could have been caught that were dropped. In this case, Pettis caught 53 of 54 catchable balls (per PFF's tracking). That's damn good, and deserves to be applauded.
  
  1 drop in 72 targets could not be more meaningless.

  
  
  Hi

  You only point out the ones that he dropped, what about the ones that he caught and gained no yardage on??

  Not enough bandwidth

  5 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

  July 2017

  Baseman said:

  dnc said:

  Baseman said:

  dnc said:

  https://twitter.com/PFF_College/status/876250876888981504?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pacifictakes.com%2Fwashington-huskies%2F2017%2F7%2F5%2F15918564%2Fwashington-huskies-football-stats-john-ross-dante-pettis-video-highlights

  
  
  PFF has some decent ideas but this tweet is exactly why they're mostly shit. Percentage of dropped targets is a completely worthless statistic. If the QB misses you by 5 yards and you never had a chance at the ball that counts as a target that wasn't dropped. As evidenced by Pettis having 53 catches, but 72 targets.
  
  Drop percentage is a worthwhile stat. It requires some subjectivity (determining if a ball was dropped or not isn't an exact science), but has value. But only if you're finding the percentage of balls that could have been caught that were dropped. In this case, Pettis caught 53 of 54 catchable balls (per PFF's tracking). That's damn good, and deserves to be applauded.
  
  1 drop in 72 targets could not be more meaningless.

  
  
  Hi

  You only point out the ones that he dropped, what about the ones that he caught and gained no yardage on??

  Not enough bandwidth

  GRUNDLE DON'T EVEN STARt

  4 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• huskyhooligan Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 5,748

  July 2017

  dnc said:

  Baseman said:

  dnc said:

  https://twitter.com/PFF_College/status/876250876888981504?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pacifictakes.com%2Fwashington-huskies%2F2017%2F7%2F5%2F15918564%2Fwashington-huskies-football-stats-john-ross-dante-pettis-video-highlights

  
  
  PFF has some decent ideas but this tweet is exactly why they're mostly shit. Percentage of dropped targets is a completely worthless statistic. If the QB misses you by 5 yards and you never had a chance at the ball that counts as a target that wasn't dropped. As evidenced by Pettis having 53 catches, but 72 targets.
  
  Drop percentage is a worthwhile stat. It requires some subjectivity (determining if a ball was dropped or not isn't an exact science), but has value. But only if you're finding the percentage of balls that could have been caught that were dropped. In this case, Pettis caught 53 of 54 catchable balls (per PFF's tracking). That's damn good, and deserves to be applauded.
  
  1 drop in 72 targets could not be more meaningless.

  
  
  Hi

  You only point out the ones that he dropped, what about the ones that he caught and gained no yardage on??

  I had an epiphany watching the Oregon game the other day, that Mi Chico is Mickens with the ability to run forward after the catch.

  1 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• dnc Member Posts: 56,823

  July 2017

  huskyhooligan said:

  dnc said:

  Baseman said:

  dnc said:

  https://twitter.com/PFF_College/status/876250876888981504?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pacifictakes.com%2Fwashington-huskies%2F2017%2F7%2F5%2F15918564%2Fwashington-huskies-football-stats-john-ross-dante-pettis-video-highlights

  
  
  PFF has some decent ideas but this tweet is exactly why they're mostly shit. Percentage of dropped targets is a completely worthless statistic. If the QB misses you by 5 yards and you never had a chance at the ball that counts as a target that wasn't dropped. As evidenced by Pettis having 53 catches, but 72 targets.
  
  Drop percentage is a worthwhile stat. It requires some subjectivity (determining if a ball was dropped or not isn't an exact science), but has value. But only if you're finding the percentage of balls that could have been caught that were dropped. In this case, Pettis caught 53 of 54 catchable balls (per PFF's tracking). That's damn good, and deserves to be applauded.
  
  1 drop in 72 targets could not be more meaningless.

  
  
  Hi

  You only point out the ones that he dropped, what about the ones that he caught and gained no yardage on??

  I had an epiphany watching the Oregon game the other day, that Mi Chico is Mickens with the ability to run forward after the catch.

  So not Mickens then

  9 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• CuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,499

  July 2017

  Mickens was great at the bubble screen for -2 yards to set up 3rd and 12.

  9 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 110,414

  July 2017

  CuntWaffle said:

  Mickens was great at the bubble screen for -2 yards to set up 3rd and 12.

  Setting up an out route for 11 yards

  6 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• Passion Member Posts: 4,622

  July 2017 edited July 2017

  Pettis' snag of an errant Browning pass in the end zone at arizona justifies his scholarship, by itself.

  4 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• Gladstone Member Posts: 16,419

  July 2017 edited July 2017

  Passion said:

  Pettis' snag of an errant Browning pass in the end zone at arizona justifies his scholarship, by itself.

  Was it for sure errant though? I think he was throwing to Pettis.
  
  Edit go to 2:07
  
  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tBgUNJJyz-w

  0 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• Dennis_DeYoung Member Posts: 14,754

  July 2017

  Gladstone said:

  Passion said:

  Pettis' snag of an errant Browning pass in the end zone at arizona justifies his scholarship, by itself.

  Was it for sure errant though? I think he was throwing to Pettis.
  
  Edit go to 2:07
  
  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tBgUNJJyz-w

  Pretty sure it was to the guy (Chico?) behind Pettis and DP jumped up and snagged it.
  
  I'm a relatively big doog for Pettis - he always reminded me a bit of Steve Largent. Great hands, odd movement style, but sneaky fast and does really well in space and at crunch times.
  
  NOT SAYING HE'S LARGENT DON'T TWIST.

  0 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• CuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,499

  July 2017

  Who is going to replace John Ross?

  4 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter