30 for 30 SC
Comments
-
They care about as much as the guy getting his cock sucked by a groupie whore cares about the whore.Pitchfork51 said:Do people really think sc cares about Washington ?
I thought that was just a joke on this site. -
Hi. Between 2001 and 2009 - the Carroll era- when did UW matter?creepycoug said:So over and over everyone says there are two games that matter at SC:
1. UCLA; and
2. Notre Dame
No Washington?
Where's the respect?
Overall this thing pales in comparison to the first 30 for 30. You get a good look at the ghey manufactured hype machine at SC so that's good. Such faggotry in LA.
Still, no mention of Washington. Must hurt given the speshul relation ship.
There's also an unnecessary dig on my Kewgs. I won't soon forget that.
this year they aren't scheduled. SC plays YOUR Kewgs @7:30 on a Friday night. SC on a Friday night means your team sucks. Hope this helps. -
Nothing kills me more than when people shit on Pete.
It was the most dominating dynasty since Miami. -
Pete won one BCS title.
Saban has more than that in his couch cushions.
Teams on a title run don't lose to the fucking Beavers like clockwork. -
The Rich Rod fellater, and, all around terrible football prognosticator, hath spoken (we have the screenshots).Mosster47 said:Pete won one BCS title.
Saban has more than that in his couch cushions.
Teams on a title run don't lose to the fucking Beavers like clockwork.
@Mosster47 has become the @HondoATVFS of the football bored. -
Terrible post is terriblePitchfork51 said:Nothing kills me more than when people shit on Pete.
It was the most dominating dynasty since Miami. -
Mosster47 said:
Pete won one BCS title.
Saban has more than that in his couch cushions.
Teams on a title run don't lose to the fucking Beavers like clockwork.
Am I wrong? A dynasty isn't dominating a shitty conference, USC does that in their sleep.MisterEm said:
The Rich Rod fellater, and, all around terrible football prognosticator, hath spoken (we have the screenshots).Mosster47 said:Pete won one BCS title.
Saban has more than that in his couch cushions.
Teams on a title run don't lose to the fucking Beavers like clockwork.
@Mosster47 has become the @HondoATVFS of the football bored.
Pete won one BCS Championship. Gene Chizick has the same. Pete demolished the Pac-10 when it wad fucking awful and beat up on the B1G Ten. He wasn't Miami or Nebraska.
Pete is a great coach, but was anyone in the conference even remotely decent during his time? Cal had one decent year. Oregon had one decent year.
When Bellotti hired Chip in 2007 Pete was fucking over. By the time he left he was the head of an 8 win program. Chip would have throat fucked him worse than Harbaugh already was if he stuck around.
Mike fucking Riley. -
You, too, must get in touch with @reedstrong; he'll explain.Baseman said:
Hi. Between 2001 and 2009 - the Carroll era- when did UW matter?creepycoug said:So over and over everyone says there are two games that matter at SC:
1. UCLA; and
2. Notre Dame
No Washington?
Where's the respect?
Overall this thing pales in comparison to the first 30 for 30. You get a good look at the ghey manufactured hype machine at SC so that's good. Such faggotry in LA.
Still, no mention of Washington. Must hurt given the speshul relation ship.
There's also an unnecessary dig on my Kewgs. I won't soon forget that.
this year they aren't scheduled. SC plays YOUR Kewgs @7:30 on a Friday night. SC on a Friday night means your team sucks. Hope this helps.
Thanks for the scheduling heads up.
-
Guysm guysm guysm, the OP wasn't focused on the most recent SC run. That's the topic of the 30/30 but the comment made therein about ND and UCLA, as well as UW's team crush on the Trojans, is an all time thing.
Cheese and Rice ... You all need some @reedstrong time. -
This entire thread belongs on doogman. Along with the OP
